Location of Repository

Fertility response to financial incentives evidence from the Working Families Tax Credit in the UK

By Asako Ohinata


The introduction of the 1999 Working Families Tax Credit (WFTC) in the UK encouraged low income families with children to enter the labor market. The tax credit, however, may have had the unintended side effect of increasing the childbearing of these households. While many studies have looked at the importance of WFTC on the female labor supply, only few have estimated the impact it had on fertility decisions of British families. This paper employs the 1995 to 2003 British Household Panel Survey and identifies the policy impact of WFTC by observing the change in the probability of birth as well as the timing of birth using the difference in differences estimator. The main findings of this paper suggest that single women responded to the policy introduction by reducing the probability of birth and prolonging the birth intervals across all birth parity. For women with partners, on the other hand, the estimates indicate that financial incentives did not encourage them to enter motherhood but it rather induced women to have their second birth quicker

Topics: HV
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1365

Suggested articles



  1. (2005):”Subsidizing the stork: New evidence on tax incentives and fertility”, doi
  2. (2001). A ‘Natural Experiment’ on the economics of storks: Evidence on the impact of differential family policy on fertility rates in Canada”, Cahier de recherché, Working paper No.
  3. (2004). A ‘Third Way’ in welfare reform: What are the lessons for the US?”, doi
  4. (1995). A class of binary response models for grouped duration data”, doi
  5. (2003). A multilevel analysis of child care and women’s fertility decisions in Western Germany”, doi
  6. (1991). A Treatise on the family”, Cambridge,
  7. (1999). An empirical analysis of the welfare magnet debate”, doi
  8. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data”, doi
  9. and A.S.Kalwij (2001): “Female labor market transition and the timing of births: A simultaneous analysis of the effects of schooling”, doi
  10. and M.Killingsworth (2004): “New Jersey’s family cap: Do fertility impacts differ by racial diversity?’, doi
  11. (2004). Birth-month, school graduation and the timing of births and marriage”, Demography, doi
  12. (1992). Children and household economic behavior”,
  13. (2003). Did expanding the EITC promote motherhood?”, doi
  14. (2005). Did Working Families’ Tax Credit work? The final evaluation of the impact of in-work support on parents’ labor supply and take-up behavior in the UK”, Inland Revenue Working Paper 2.
  15. (2000). Diverging fertility among U.S. women who delay childbearing past age 30”, Demography, doi
  16. (2003). Do Family Caps reduce out-of-wedlock births? Evidence from Arkansas, doi
  17. (2005). Does fertility respond to financial incentives?”, C.E.P.R.Discussion Papers 5007.
  18. (2007). Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK”, The Centre for Market and Public Organization Working Paper 07/77.
  19. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data”, doi
  20. (2003). Econometric analysis”, 5 th edn, the USA:
  21. (2005). Evaluating the labor market impact of Working Families’ Tax Credit using difference-in-differences”, Inland Revenue Working Paper 4.
  22. (2004). Family cap provisions and changes in births and abortions”, Population Research and Policy Review 23(5-6): doi
  23. (2004). Fertility and financial incentives in France”, doi
  24. (2001). From welfare to work: Has welfare reform worked?”, doi
  25. Grilli,L.(2005): “The random-effects proportional hazards model with grouped survival data: A comparison between the grouped continuous and continuation ration versions”, doi
  26. (1993). How does the benefit effect vary as unemployment spells lengthen?”, doi
  27. (1996). How the local supply of day-care centers influences fertility in Norway: A parity-specific approach”, doi
  28. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation”, doi
  29. (2004). Is there an effect of incremental welfare benefits on fertility behavior? A look at the family cap”, doi
  30. (1999). Labor supply: A review of alternative approaches”, doi
  31. (2003). Low fertility in OECD Countries”, doi
  32. (2002). Mothers’ employment and childcare use doi
  33. (2002). New estimates of trends in births by birth order in England and Wales”, Population Trends,
  34. (2003). New Jersey’s Family Cap and welfare births: An examination of racial differences in fertility within the framework of proximate determinants”, doi
  35. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data”, doi
  36. Peters (2000):”Welfare waivers and nonmarital childbearing”, Joint Centre for Poverty Research Working Paper 128.
  37. (2000). Preventing subsequent births to welfare recipients", In Preventing Subsequent Births to Welfare Recipients,
  38. (1998). Reforms to in-work transfer payments in the UK”, in C. Lucifora and W. Salverda (eds), Policies for Low Wage Employment and Social Exclusion,
  39. (2006). State-level welfare policies and nonmarital subsequent childbearing”, doi
  40. (2004). Survival analysis”,
  41. (2003). The childcare tax credit element of Working Families’ Tax Credit: a qualitative study”,
  42. (2006). The Earned Income Tax Credit and fertility”, forthcoming in doi
  43. (1997). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility: What do we know and what do we need to know?”, Institute for Research on Poverty, discussion paper no.
  44. (1994). The effect on tax-transfer policies on fertility in Canada, 1921-88.”, doi
  45. (2000). The Family Credit system and the Working Families Tax Credit in the United Kingdom”,
  46. (2004). The impact of the introduction of the UK minimum wage on the employment probabilities of low wage workers”, doi
  47. (2000). The labor market impact of the Working Families’ Tax Credit”, doi
  48. (1998). The modernization of Britain’s tax and benefit system number three: The Working Families Tax Credit and work incentives”, Budget report 98.
  49. (2001). The mystery of the vanishing benefits: An introduction to impact evaluation”, doi
  50. (2007). The socioeconomic consequences of ‘InWork’ benefit reform for British lone mothers”,
  51. Trust (2003): “Parents need more help from government & employers as childcare bills rocket”, press release.
  52. (2002). Welfare reform and non-marital fertility in the 1990s: Evidence from birth records”, NBER Working Papers 9406, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi
  53. (1998). Working Families Tax Credit and Family Credit”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.