Location of Repository

Unions, wages and labour productivity: evidence from Indian cotton mills

By Bishnupriya Gupta

Abstract

This paper uses firm level data from all the textile producing regions in India to examine the relation between wages, unionization and labour productivity. We find that fewer workers were employed per machine in the unionized mills in Bombay and Ahmedabad, as compared to non-unionized regions implying that low labour productivity was not due to union resistance to increased work intensity. Our findings suggest that while low wages in India encouraged overmanning, higher wages, prompted by unionization, had productivity enhancing effects. We explore alternative explanations for low labour productivity, arising from the managerial and institutional structure of Indian cotton mills

Topics: DS, HD
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1442

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1989). Bombay Textile Labour: Managers, Trade Unionists and Officials 1918-1939,
  2. (1994). Factory Discipline”, doi
  3. (1987). How unions affect productivity in manufacturing plants”, doi
  4. (1999). Monopoly rights: A barrier to riches”, doi
  5. (1984). New evidence on the English mule and cotton industry”, doi
  6. (1921). Office, Report on enquiry into wages and hours of labour in the cotton mill industry, doi
  7. (1994). Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India, Cambridge: doi
  8. (1994). Perils of lifetime employment systems: Productivity advance in the Indian and Japanese textile industries, 1920-1938”, doi
  9. (1972). Private Investment in India, Cambridge: doi
  10. (1977). Productivity change and labour absorption in Japanese cotton spinning, 1891-1935,” doi
  11. (1927). Report of the Indian Tariff Board,
  12. (1930). The Cotton Industry India, doi
  13. (1975). The Cotton Trade and Commercial Development of Bombay, 1855-1875, Ph.D thesis,
  14. (1965). The Emergence of an Early Indian Labour Force in India, doi
  15. (1967). The Entrepreneurial and Technical Cadres of Bombay Cotton Textile Industry between 1854 and 1914: A Study in the International Transmission and diffusion of Techniques, PhD thesis,
  16. (1987). The Making of Industrial Relations: The Ahmedabad Textile Industry, 1918-3, doi
  17. (2000). The National Income of India,
  18. (1991). The productivity effects of unionization and firm-size in British engineering firms”, doi
  19. (1967). Time, work discipline and industrial capitalism”, Past and Present, doi
  20. (1978). Trade unions in production process”, doi
  21. (1986). Unionization and productivity in office building and school construction”, doi
  22. (2003). Unions and Productivity, Financial Performance and Investment: International Evidence” in doi
  23. (1984). What do Unions Do ? London: doi
  24. (1987). Why isn’t the whole world developed? Lessons from the cotton mills, doi
  25. (1998). Why nations fail: Managerial decisions and performance in Indian cotton textile, 1890-1938”, doi
  26. (1999). Why to some countries produce so much more output per worker than others”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.