Location of Repository

Relaxing tax competition through public good differentiation

By Ben Zissimos and Myrna Holtz Wooders


This paper argues that, because governments are able to relax tax competition through public good differentiation, traditionally high-tax countries have continued to set taxes at a relatively high rate even as markets have become more integrated. The key assumption is that firms vary in the extent to which public good provision reduces costs. We show that Leviathan governments are able to use this fact to relax the forces of tax competition, reducing efficiency. When firms can ‘vote with their feet’ tax competition leads firms to locate in ‘too many’ jurisdictions. A ‘minimum tax’ further relaxes tax competition, further reducing efficiency

Topics: HB
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1458

Suggested articles



  1. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” doi
  2. (1983). An Optimal Taxation Approach to Fiscal Federalism.” doi
  3. (1989). Bidding for
  4. (1986). Commodity Tax Competition Between Member States of a Federation: Equilibrium and Efficiency.” doi
  5. (2000). Competing for Capital in a ‘Lumpy’ doi
  6. (2004). Discontinuous Payoffs, Shared Resources, doi
  7. (1988). Economic Competition Among Jurisdictions: Effi-ciency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing?” doi
  8. (2003). Evaluating Tax Policy for Location Decisions.” International Tax and Public Finance, doi
  9. (1989). Interjurisdictional Capital Mobility: Fiscal Externality and a Corrective Subsidy.” doi
  10. (2004). Irish PM rejects calls for EU corporate tax harmonization.” Available online at http://www.EUbusiness.com, published on 14
  11. (1993). Jeux Sans Frontieres: Tax Competition and Tax Coordination When Countries Differ in
  12. (2003). Leviathan and Capital Tax Competition in doi
  13. (1995). Leviathan and Local Tax Policies: Do Local Governments Maximize Revenue?” Working Paper E-185-95,
  14. (1999). Leviathan, Local Government Expenditures and Capitalization.” doi
  15. (1999). Multijurisdictional Economies, The Tiebout Hypothesis and Sorting.” doi
  16. (1988). Nash Equilibria in Models of Fiscal doi
  17. (1981). Optimal Fiscal Policy for a State or Local Government.” doi
  18. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods.” doi
  19. (2001). Product Differentiation and Public Education.” doi
  20. (2002). Public Goods in Trade: On the Formation of Markets and doi
  21. (1983). Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes,” The Bell doi
  22. (1982). Relaxing Price Competition Through Product Differentiation,” The Review of Economic Studies, doi
  23. (1985). Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical
  24. (1991). Sunk Costs and Market Structure, doi
  25. (2001). Tax Competition: Bane or Boon?” Typescript. doi
  26. (1999). Tax Structure and Government Behavior: Implications for Tax Policy,” doi
  27. (1980). The Power To Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, doi
  28. (2001). The Role of Market Size in the Formation of doi
  29. (1994). Too Much Conformity? A Hotelling Model of Local Public Good Supply.”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.