Location of Repository

Is comprehensive education really free? A case study of the effects of secondary school admissions policies of house prices in one local area

By Dennis Leech and Erick Campos

Abstract

This paper reports on a study that tests the anecdotal hypothesis that parents are willing to pay a premium to secure places for their children in popular and oversubscribed comprehensive schools. Since many local education authorities use admissions policies based on catchment areas and places in popular schools are very hard to obtain from outside these areas - but very easy from within them - parents have an incentive to move house for the sake of their children's education. This would be expected to be reflected in house prices. The study uses a cross sectional sample based on two popular schools in one local education authority area, Coventry. Differences in housing quality are dealt with by using the technique of hedonic regression and differences in location by sample selection within a block sample design. The sample was chosen from a limited number of locations spanning different catchment areas in order to reduce both observable and unobservable variability in nuisance effects while maximising the variation in catchment areas. The results suggest that there are strong school catchment area effects. For one of the two popular schools we find a 20 percent premium and for the other a 16 percent premium on house prices ceteris paribus

Topics: HC, LB1603
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Year: 2001
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1597

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. A.(1998), “Predicting House Prices Using Multiple Listings Data,”
  2. (1979). An estimation of a Structural Hedonic Prices Model of the Housing Market: An application of Rosen’s Theory doi
  3. (1983). Changes in City and Suburban House Prices During a Period of Expected School Desegregation”, doi
  4. (2001). Code of Practice on School Admissions, Department for Education and Employment, London, The Stationery Office,
  5. (1990). Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education”, doi
  6. (1979). Economic Analysis of an Urban Housing Market, doi
  7. (1998). Estimating the Demand for Housing, Land and Neighbourhood Characteristics,” doi
  8. (1984). Estimating the Demand for the Characteristics of Housing,” doi
  9. (1999). Hedonic Analysis of Housing Markets”, doi
  10. Hedonic Prices and Housing Demand,” doi
  11. (1987). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated Products,” doi
  12. (1980). Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure doi
  13. (1979). Hedonic Prices, Property Values and Measuring Environmental Benefits: a Survey of the Issues", doi
  14. (2000). Housing Price Index Methodology", Nationwide Building Society,
  15. Measuring Irish Housing Quality,” doi
  16. (1970). Measuring the Value of Housing Quality,” doi
  17. (2000). National Summary Data Report for Secondary Schools,”
  18. (1996). New Hedonic Estimates of Regional Constant Quality House Prices,” doi
  19. (1988). On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions,” doi
  20. (1998). School Admissions: Increasing Equity, Accountability an Transparency”, doi
  21. (1997). Spatial Dependence and House Price Index,”
  22. (1997). The Construction of Residential Housing Price Indices: A Comparison of Repeat-Sales, Hedonic-Regression and Hybrid Approaches,”
  23. (2000). The Value of Secondary School Quality”, doi
  24. (2000). Transfer to Secondary Education in Coventry 2000: Information for parents of children attending Local Authority, Church of England and Catholic Primary Schools.
  25. (1999). Which Measures of School Quality Does the Housing Market Measure?”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.