Location of Repository

Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes

By Diane Stone

Abstract

The phrase 'think tank' has become ubiquitous – overworked and underspecified – in the political lexicon. It is entrenched in scholarly discussions of public policy as well as in the 'policy wonk' of journalists, lobbyists and spin-doctors. This does not mean that there is an agreed definition of think tank or consensual understanding of their roles and functions. Nevertheless, the majority of organizations with this label undertake policy research of some kind. The idea of think tanks as a research communication 'bridge' presupposes that there are discernible boundaries between (social) science and policy. This paper will investigate some of these boundaries. The frontiers are not only organizational and legal; they also exist in how the 'public interest' is conceived by these bodies and their financiers. Moreover, the social interactions and exchanges involved in 'bridging', themselves muddy the conception of 'boundary', allowing for analysis to go beyond the dualism imposed in seeing science on one side of the bridge, and the state on the other, to address the complex relations between experts and public policy

Topics: JN101, JA
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1798

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). A Capitol Idea: Think Tanks and US Foreign Policy,
  2. (2004). A hollowed out tradition: British think tanks in the twenty-first century’, in Diane Stone and Andrew Denham (eds) Think Tank Traditions: Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas,
  3. (2003). A limited dialogue: Think tanks and the policy making process
  4. (1997). Advising the Executive: Think Tanks, Consultants, Political Staff and Kitchen Cabinets’,
  5. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, doi
  6. (1996). Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process, doi
  7. (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, doi
  8. (1999). Dialogue with Think Tanks: A Report of A Meeting With the United Nations Secretary General",
  9. (2004). Europe and its think tanks; a promise to be fulfilled. An analysis of think tanks specialised
  10. (2004). Global Institutions and Development: Framing the World? doi
  11. (2004). Lithuania – Phase 1 report’, Baltic International Center for Economic Policy Studies, Interim Report for the Bridging Research and Policy Report,
  12. (2002). Managing Think Tanks: Practical Guidance for Maturing Organizations, Budapest, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Washington DC.,
  13. (2004). Policy Research in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Role and Impact of Local Thinks’,
  14. (2004). Science/policy boundaries: a changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice’, Sabine Maasse and Peter Weingart (eds) Scientific Expertise and Political Decision Making, doi
  15. (2003). The cargo cult of democracy in Romania and what local think tanks can do to bring about the real thing’,
  16. (2000). The formation of the new entrepreneurial state and modern management consultancy’, doi
  17. (1991). The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite, doi
  18. (2003). Thinking the Unthinkable, Bratislava, UNDP Regional Bureau for Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States
  19. (2002). Transnational Discourse Communities: Globalizing Public Management’, doi
  20. (2001). Walking the Talk: Global Public Policy in Action’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.