Location of Repository

Costly arbitrage and asset prices: evidence from closed-end funds

By Gordon Gemmill and D. C. (Dylan C.) Thomas

Abstract

If arbitrage is costly and noise traders are active, asset prices may deviate from fundamental values for long periods of time. We use a sample of 158 closed-end funds to show that noise-trader sentiment, as proxied by retail-investor flows, leads to fluctuations in the discount. Nevertheless, we reject the hypothesis that noise-trader risk is the cause of the long-run discount. Instead we find that funds which are more difficult to arbitrage have larger discounts, due to: (i) the censoring of the discount by the arbitrage bounds, and (ii) the freedom of managers to increase charges when arbitrage is costly

Topics: HG, HB
Publisher: Warwick Business School, Financial Econometrics Research Centre
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1804

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1999). 14 There is consistency here with a recent U.S. study by Rowe and Davidson
  2. (2000). 15 There is recent evidence that flows have a large impact on the variance of daily returns for open-end funds (Goetzmann,
  3. (1978). 5 A note on the value of the open-ending put, based on Margrabe’s
  4. (1999). 9 A slightly different aspect of agency is whether funds which have low discounts perform better than other funds. Chay and Trzcinka
  5. (1992). A re-examination of the relationship between closed-end fund discounts and expenses, doi
  6. (1976). A theoretical and empirical investigation of the dual purpose funds, doi
  7. (1983). Abnormal returns from merger profiles, doi
  8. (1995). Aggregate mutual fund flows and security returns, doi
  9. (1993). Are the discounts on closedend funds a sentiment index? doi
  10. (2000). Behavioral factors in mutual fund flows, Working paper, doi
  11. (1988). Closed-end fund shares’ abnormal returns and the information content of discounts and premiums, doi
  12. (1999). Closed-end funds: A survey, doi
  13. (1996). Costly arbitrage: Evidence from closed-end funds, doi
  14. (1997). Descriptive Statistics on Companies by Sector The table shows statistics for the population of 158 cl osed-end equity funds traded on the London Stock Exchange in the period 1991 to
  15. (1998). Do investors care about sentiment? doi
  16. Equation (6) for (Discount) Equation (7) for (Flow) Sector Vt-1 Constant (Intrate)
  17. (1990). Expenses, yields and excess returns: New evidence on closedend fund discounts from the U.K., Discussion paper 108, Financial Markets Group, London School of Economics.
  18. (1984). finds that 14 U.S. funds which open-end have discounts which are 7.4 percent more on average than for a matched equivalent sample, when measured one year in advance of the event.
  19. (2000). Fund advisor compensation in closed-end funds, doi
  20. (2000). Governance and boards of directors in closed-end investment companies, Working paper, doi
  21. (1995). Investment trust IPOs: Issuing behavior and price performance, doi
  22. (1991). Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle, doi
  23. (1993). Investor sentiment and the closed-end fund puzzle: A 7 percent solution, doi
  24. (1995). Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models doi
  25. (1999). Managerial performance and the cross-sectional pricing of closed-end funds, doi
  26. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets, doi
  27. (1984). Open-ending closed-end funds, doi
  28. (1993). Private benefits from block ownership and discounts on closed-end funds, doi
  29. Sector Number of Funds in the Sample Average Discount 12/91-12/97 % Average Expense Ratio 1991-97 % Average Dividend Yield 1991-97 % Average Net Asset Value of Fund 1991-97 $m.
  30. Showing the Characteristic Characteristic Discount Level Net-Asset Value Level Price Level Skewness
  31. (1998). The closed-end fund discount and performance persistence, Working paper, London Business School. doi
  32. (1970). The discounts on
  33. (1992). The first column of the table shows the results of a Johansen test for cointegration of retail flows to open-end funds and the discount on closed-end funds in the same investment sector, using monthly data over the period
  34. (1991). The investment trust discount revisited, doi
  35. (1989). The Investment Trust Industry in the U.K.: An Empirical Analysis
  36. (1996). The marketing of closed-end fund IPOs: Evidence from transactions data, doi
  37. (1970). The premium on the Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust and the proportion of fund equity held by retail investors,
  38. (1992). The relationship for the Japanese sector between retail flows to open-end funds and the discount on closed-end funds. The value-weighted discounts of U.K. closed-end funds investing in Japan at the end of each month
  39. (1992). The relationship for the North American sector between retail flows to open-end funds and the discount on closed-end funds. The value-weighted discounts of U.K. closed-end funds investing in North America at the end of each month
  40. (1995). The structure of closed-end fund discounts revisited, doi
  41. (1998). The U.K. Closed-End Fund Discount,
  42. (1977). The valuation of closed-end investment company shares, doi
  43. (1978). The value of an option to exchange one asset for another, doi
  44. (1997). Warrants on the London Stock Exchange: Pricing bias and investor confusion, doi
  45. (1996). When are closed-end funds open? Rights offers as a response to premiums , Working paper,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.