Tracking error: ex-ante versus ex-post measures

Abstract

In this paper we show that ex-ante and ex-post tracking errors must necessarily differ, since portfolio weights are ex-post stochastic in nature. In particular, ex-post tracking error is always larger than ex-ante tracking error. Our results imply that fund managers always have a higher ex-post tracking error than their planned tracking error, and thus unless our results are considered, any performance fee based on ex-post tracking error is unfavourable to fund managers

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository

redirect
Last time updated on 01/12/2017

This paper was published in Warwick Research Archives Portal Repository.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.