Location of Repository

Neither national boundaries nor transnational social spaces: accounting for variations of CSR practices in varieties of capitalism

By Kenneth Amaeshi


The paper empirically re-examines the role of national institutions and trans-national social spaces in accounting for variations in CSR practices. Based on a longitudinal study of corporate social reporting in UK and Germany, the paper concludes that corporate stakeholder salience patterns are outcomes of interaction effects between national institutional boundaries and trans-national social spaces. It pushes the institutionalist frontier of research to corporate stakeholder salience – which is a precursor and intrinsic to both corporate accountability and corporate social responsibility. In addition, it opens a new vista of looking at corporate social reports – i.e. not only as artefacts of accountability, but also carriers and reflectors of national and trans-national characteristics and influences. The paper finally highlights implications of the findings for CSR and comparative capitalism research, respectively

Topics: HB, HD
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1862

Suggested articles



  1. (2007). Analysing the Changing Landscape of European Financial Centres: doi
  2. (2000). Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy. doi
  3. (2006). Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US, Corporate Governance: doi
  4. (1998). Customer care in a consumer society: smiling and sometimes meaning it. doi
  5. (1995). Dimensions of customer orientation – an empirical investigation of the UK financial services sector. doi
  6. (1999). Firms, institutions and management control: The comparative analysis of coordination and control systems. doi
  7. (2004). Globalisation, shareholder value, restructuring: the (non)-transformation of Siemens. New Political Economy, doi
  8. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith – a failure of analysis. Human Relations, doi
  9. (2008). Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. doi
  10. (2004). Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for understanding CSR doi
  11. (2007). Institutional co-entrepreneurship and the transnationalisation of the EU aerospace sector: a discourse analytic perspective Technology, Innovation and Institutions Working Paper Series,
  12. (2005). Institutional Legacies and Firm Dynamics: The Growth and Internationalization of UK and German Law Firms. doi
  13. (2007). Introduction: beyond varieties of capitalism. doi
  14. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions – the diffusion and rejection of innovations. doi
  15. (1987). Multivariate analysis of variance. doi
  16. (1999). Oil in Nigeria: con¯ict and litigation between oil companies and village communities, Munster, Hamburg and London: Lit Verlag Frynas, doi
  17. (2000). Reflections on Quantification in Corporate Social Reporting Content Analysis Accounting, doi
  18. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism, Houndmills, Basignstoke:
  19. (2004). Stakeholders as Citizens? Rethinking Rights, Participation, and Democracy. doi
  20. (2005). Stakeholders under Pressure: corporate governance and labour management in Germany and Japan, Corporate Governance: An doi
  21. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. doi
  22. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, doi
  23. (1998). The Changing Role of Banks and Corporate Governance in Germany: Evolution Toward the Market. Pp.17-34 in Competition and convergence in financial markets : the German and Anglo-American models, edited by
  24. (2004). The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms.
  25. (2000). The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions? European Accounting Review, doi
  26. (1995). The role of management consultants in the development of IT. doi
  27. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. doi
  28. (2006). Transnational Actors, Transnational Institutions, Transnational spaces: The role of law firms in the internationalisation of competition regulation, doi
  29. (1981). Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. Houndmills Basingstoke, doi
  30. (1947). Varieties of Capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage, doi
  31. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.