Location of Repository

Exteriorising terror: inside/outside the failing state on 7 July 2005

By Dan Bulley

Abstract

Despite continuing to emphasise how globalisation reduces the relevance of separate ‘foreign’ and ‘domestic’ spheres, the British government’s response to the London bombings sought to exteriorise the event as foreign, even though it appeared largely domestic. This helped construct it as unusual, contingent, part of the uncontrollable ‘otherness’ of the ‘foreign’. However, it also drew the response into the arena of British foreign policy, where the ‘failing states’ has been the dominant conceptualisation of insecurity and terrorism, especially since September 11. When the bombings are examined through the ‘failing state’ disturbing and important problems are uncovered. Primarily, the ‘failing state’ discourse deconstructs under the influence of the terrorism in London, revealing that Britain itself is a ‘failing state’ by its own description and producing a generalisation of state ‘failure’. It thereby reveals several possible sites for responding to and resisting the government’s representation

Topics: JZ, HV
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1882

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2004b), ‘Speech on the threat of global terrorism’
  2. (2005a), Media Interviews with Guardian Unlimited,
  3. (2007). 7 bombs: three in court as hunt goes on’,
  4. (1999). Africa: Backing Success’,
  5. (2003). Autoimmunity: Real and Symbolic Suicides – A Dialogue with Jacques Derrida’ doi
  6. (2005). British suicide bombers carried out London attacks, say police’,
  7. (1987). Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Towards a Critical Social Theory of doi
  8. Gilles Quentel The Translation of a Crucial Political Speech: G.W.Bush’ State of the Union Address
  9. (2005). Globalization: A Critical Introduction, second edition (Basingstoke/New York:
  10. (2006). How London carried on’
  11. (1997). Human Rights Into a New Century’, 17 July. Unless stated, all speeches, interviews and press conferences by Foreign Office Ministers were downloaded from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office website: http://www.fco.gov.uk (accessed 1
  12. (2004). Inside the mind of a terrorist’, doi
  13. (1993). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: doi
  14. (2000). Labour’s trajectory in foreign affairs: the moral crusade of a pivotal power?’,
  15. (2006). Lawyer condemns ‘wild west’ police raid’,
  16. (2006). Leak reveals official story of London bombings,’
  17. (2003). Let the United Nations mean what it says and do what it means: Speech to Labour Party Spring Conference’, 15 February http://www.labour.org.uk/news/tbglasgow (accessed 3
  18. (2004). Madrid school used by British on bombers’ list’,
  19. (2007). MI5 decided to stop watching two suicide bombers’,
  20. (2005). Monthly Downing Street press conference,
  21. (2005). Pakistan militants linked to London attacks,’
  22. (2007). Profile: Mohammad Sidique Khan,’ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4762209.stm; and ‘Profile: Shehzad Tanweer,’ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4762313.stm (accessed 1
  23. (2006). Q&A: the De Menezes investigation’,
  24. (2006). Report of the Official Account of the
  25. (2005). Rogues: Two Essays on Reason (Stanford: doi
  26. (2004). Shaping a stronger United Nations’,
  27. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: doi
  28. (2000). Speech to Global Ethics Foundation,
  29. (2005). Speech to the General Assembly at the 2005 UN World Summit, doi
  30. (2006). Third Foreign Policy Speech,
  31. (2001). Whose Hunger? Concepts of Famine,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.