Location of Repository

Global governance and the HIV/AIDS response: limitations of current approaches and policies

By Marcelo I. Saguier

Abstract

This paper critically examines the constraints of the current global governance of HIV/AIDS to reach the target set by governments and the leading development institutions to halt and begin to reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS by 2015 as part of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The HIV/AIDS crisis can only be resolved effectively when its nexus with poverty and neo-liberal globalization is acknowledged and addressed by comprehensive and long-term policy responses. Three dimensions of the current global governance of HIV/AIDS are identified as strategically relevant for a reform agenda: first, the democratic deficit of decision making processes and institutions; second, the limited access of sufficient and reliable sources of financial resources and the burden of foreign debt in developing countries; thirdly, the intellectual property rights regime and its effects on the access of anti-retroviral drugs for AIDS treatment

Topics: HC, JZ, RA
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1883

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2006). 3…2…1…gone? Failure to call Global Fund Round 6 risks the whole 2010 AIDS treatment target’,
  2. (2006). Access to Essential Medicines for HIV’, Policy Briefing’,
  3. (2005). Advocacy Alert: Global Fund Financing,
  4. (2005). Changing Course – Alternative Approaches to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals and Fight HIV/AIDS’,
  5. (2006). Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) doi
  6. (2002). Civil Society and Global Finance, Warwick Studies in Globalisation, doi
  7. (2000). Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements, Cambridge: doi
  8. (2002). Debt relief and the HIV/AIDS crisis in
  9. (2006). Development Programme (UNDP) doi
  10. (2003). District health systems in a neoliberal world: a review of five key policy areas’, doi
  11. (2006). Foundation doi
  12. Gilles Quentel The Translation of a Crucial Political Speech: G.W.Bush’ State of the Union Address
  13. (2005). Global Leadership and Global Health: ‘Contending Metanarratives, Divergent Responses, doi
  14. (2006). of AIDS Service Organizations (ICASO) doi
  15. (2004). Patents and Access to Medicines: What Can be Done at National Level’, Briefing Paper 23, Third World Network,
  16. (2005). Program on AIDS (UNAIDS) doi
  17. Program on AIDS (UNAIDS) (2006b) ‘Quality Education and HIV & AIDS’, Inter-Agency Task Team (IATT) on Education, doi
  18. (2000). Structures, agents and institutions: private corporate power and the globalisation of intellectual property rights’, doi
  19. (2002). The Global AIDS Fund: context and opportunity’, doi
  20. (2005). The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria doi
  21. (2002). The Global Fund: Which countries owe how much?,
  22. (2000). The Macro Implications of HIV/AIDS in South Africa: A Preliminary Assessment’, doi
  23. (2007). The poverty of amnesia in structural adjustment’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.