Location of Repository

Civil society and legitimation of global governance

By Jan Aart Scholte

Abstract

Along with the general intensified globalisation of social relations in contemporary history has come an unprecedented expansion of regulatory apparatuses that cover planetary jurisdictions and constituencies. On the whole, however, this global governance remains weak relative to pressing current needs for global public policy. Shortfalls in moral standing, legal foundations, material delivery, democratic credentials and charismatic leadership have together generated large legitimacy deficits in existing global regimes. This fragile overall legitimacy has in turn constituted a major obstacle to achieving the substantial further growth of global-scale regulation that is required to secure decent human lives for all in a more global world. Insufficient capacities for global governance and insufficient legitimacy of global governance are thus coupled in damaging mutual reinforcement.\ud \ud This paper argues that – although there are of course considerable variations across different global governance institutions and different civil society initiatives – the general picture has been one of but partially realised potentials of legitimacy promotion. Like the tip of the proverbial iceberg, civil society activities concerning global regulation have so far made visible only a fraction of the total mass of possibilities. Hence prescriptions for the future centre on ‘more’ and ‘better’. Regarding more quantity, urgently required greater positive legitimation of global governance can be promoted with more civil society engagement, covering more regulatory institutions and extending through more stages of the policy process. Regarding better quality, to have greater positive legitimation effects civil society relations with global governance generally need to be more inclusive, more competent, more coordinated, and more accountable. Both sides to the interchange – civil society associations on the one hand and global regulatory bodies on the other – can take a range of measures to further these ends

Topics: JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1885

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000a) 'Global Civil Society', doi
  2. (2000b) Globalization: A Critical Introduction. doi
  3. (2004). A New World Order. doi
  4. (1998). Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks doi
  5. (2007). Arria and Other Special Meetings between NGOs and Security Council Members’, website of the Global Policy Forum,
  6. (2002). Asia Meets Europe. doi
  7. (2007). Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Globalisation Index, at www.csgr.org,
  8. (2002). Civil Society and Global Finance. doi
  9. (1992). Civil Society and Political Theory. doi
  10. (1998). Civil Society and Uncivil Organizations’, doi
  11. (2002). Civil Society Voices and the International Monetary Fund.
  12. (2004). Civil Society. doi
  13. (2000). Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: doi
  14. (2005). Critical Theories, International Relations and ‘The Anti-Globalisation Movement’: The Politics of Global Resistance. doi
  15. (2002). De-Globalization: Ideas for a New World Economy.
  16. (2003). Democratizing the Global Economy: The Role of Civil Society. Coventry: Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, available at www.csgr.org.
  17. (2007). Development Issues in Global Governance: Market Multilateralism and Private-Public Partnerships. doi
  18. (2003). Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization. doi
  19. (2007). Forging Global Accountabilities’, in Ebrahim and Weisband (eds), Global Accountabilities. Cambridge: doi
  20. Gilles Quentel The Translation of a Crucial Political Speech: G.W.Bush’ State of the Union Address
  21. (2007). Global Accountabilities. Cambridge: doi
  22. (2006). Global Accountability Report: Holding Power to Account. London: One World Trust.
  23. (2001). Global Citizen Action. doi
  24. (2001). Global Civil Society Yearbook. doi
  25. (2003). Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. doi
  26. (2003). Global Civil Society? Cambridge: doi
  27. (2005). Global Governance doi
  28. (1999). Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. doi
  29. (2006). Globalisation and Contestation: The New Great CounterMovement.
  30. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. doi
  31. (2006). Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. doi
  32. (2005). Globalization: A Critical Introduction. doi
  33. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. doi
  34. (2003). Globalizing Civic Engagement: Civil Society and Transnational Action. doi
  35. (2003). Guide for Staff Relations with Civil Society Organizations’, at www.imf.org/external/np/cso/eng/2003/101003.htm.
  36. Krisch (eds) (2006) ‘Symposium on Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, doi
  37. (2007). Looking to the Future: A Global Civil Society Forum?’ in J.W. Walker and A.S. Thompson (eds), The Emergence of Global Civil Society.
  38. (2001). Monitoring and Evaluating Advocacy: A Scoping Study.
  39. (2004). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire.
  40. (2006). NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles, and Innovations. doi
  41. (2000). NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance. London: Foreign Policy Centre.
  42. (2005). NGOs and the United Nations: Institutionalization, Professionalization and Adaptation.
  43. (2000). No Logo. doi
  44. (2006). Political Parties and the Democratisation of Globalisation’,
  45. (1999). Polylateralism” and New Modes of Global Dialogue’,
  46. (2003). Power and Resistance in the New World Order. doi
  47. (2001). Practice-Research Engagement and Civil Society in a Globalizing World.
  48. (1999). Private Authority in International Affairs. doi
  49. (2000). Private Organizations in Global Politics. doi
  50. (2004). Reconstituting Political Authority: Complex Sovereignty and the Foundations of Global Governance. doi
  51. (2002). The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law’, doi
  52. (2003). The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: doi
  53. (2006). The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, doi
  54. (2001). The Meaning of New Medievalism’, doi
  55. (1998). The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Grassroots Movements.
  56. (2004). The WTO and Civil Society’, doi
  57. (2006). Transnational Civil Society: An Introduction. doi
  58. (2004). We The Peoples: Civil Society, the United Nations and Global Governance. Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations. New York: United Nations General Assembly Document A/58/817.
  59. (2007). website of the INGO Accountability Charter,
  60. (2007). Website of the Montreal International Forum, www.fimcivilsociety.org, accessed on 17

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.