Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Planning for a future of asset-based welfare? New Labour, financialized economic agency and the housing market

By Matthew Watson


This article focuses on core aspects of the political economy of New Labour and surveys the strategic priorities to which it is likely the planning process will have to adapt. As with other policy areas, the effects of enhanced Treasury micro-management of the Government's reform agenda has begun to impact upon the field of planning. The prime example in this respect is the Treasury's preference for replacing state provision of welfare-enhancing services with the move towards an individualized system of asset-based welfare. The article begins with an analysis of this shift, showing how it is dependent on creating financialized economic agents who think instinctively as active saver-investors in their quest to accumulate assets to fund future consumption of welfare. In contemporary Britain the housing market dominates the accumulation of assets amongst everyday saver-investors. The article concludes by analysing the possible tension that will be introduced into the planning process because of New Labour's twin goals: (1) to defend the current value of asset wealth even as the mortgage lending market has stalled and confidence in the stability of house prices has temporarily evaporated; and (2) to restrict exclusion from private ownership in the housing market so that broadening access can be used to propel a universal move towards an individualized system of asset-based welfare. The fallout from the world credit crunch, which began in autumn 2007 and remains ongoing at the time of writing in January 2009, looks likely to exacerbate what was always a tension-prone combination of objectives

Topics: HV
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001a) Myners Review of Institutional Investment in the UK: Final Report
  2. (2001b) Saving and Assets For All: The Modernisation of Britain’s Tax and Benefit System,
  3. (2006b) Barker Review of Land Use Planning: Final Report – Recommendations
  4. (1992). Arguing for Basic Income: Ethical Foundations for a Radical Reform doi
  5. (2005). Assets and public policy, in: idem (Ed) Inclusion in the American Dream: Assets, Poverty, and Public Policy (Oxford:
  6. (2004). Barker Review of Housing Supply:
  7. (2000). Building Long-Term Prosperity For All: Pre-Budget Report
  8. (2008). Characterizing New Labour: The case of the Child Trust Fund, doi
  9. Communities and Local Government (2006) Evaluation of Key Worker Living: Final Report
  10. (2008). Constituting monetary conservatives via the ‘savings habit’: New Labour and the British housing market bubble, doi
  11. (2002). Financialization of Daily Life
  12. (2005). Joined-Up Government (Oxford, doi
  13. (2007). National Housing and Planning Advice Unit
  14. (2002). New Labour’s big idea: Joined-up government, doi
  15. (2004). New Labour’s Pasts: The Labour Party and Its Discontents doi
  16. (1998). Owner occupation, employment and welfare: The impact of changing relationships on sustainable home ownership, doi
  17. (2005). Prolonged Labour: The Slow Birth doi
  18. (2004). Repoliticizing financial risk, doi
  19. (2007). Savings Gateway Scheme:
  20. (1994). Spatial disparities in the impact of the 1990-92 recession: An analysis of UK counties, doi
  21. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity doi
  22. (2005). The domestic origins of depoliticisation in the area of British economic policy, doi
  23. (2008). The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America (Oxford, doi
  24. (2007). The quiet panic about financial illiteracy, in: Libby Assassi, Anastasia Nesvetailova and Duncan Wigan (Eds) Global Finance in the New Century: Deregulation and Beyond (Basingstoke,
  25. (1999). The Stakeholder Society (New Haven, doi
  26. (1996). The unravelling of housing policy in doi
  27. (1997). The welfare state and the Conservatives, doi
  28. (2008). Varieties of residential capitalism in the international political economy: Old welfare states and the new politics of housing, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.