Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The G20 and the politics of international financial sector reform: robust regimes or hegemonic instability?

By Mark Beeson and Stephen Bell


In the aftermath of the East Asian crisis of 1997/98, much attention was given to the need for financial sector reform. While little of substance has changed in the intervening years, a number of potentially important new forums were established to facilitate international cooperation in the financial sector. This paper attempts to provide a theoretical context within which to explore one of these institutions – the G20. By drawing on theories of hegemony and regimes, this paper identifies the – potentially competing - political and institutional logics that have driven what change there has been. The key question we address is whether institutions like the G20 are likely to provide genuine mechanisms for the resolution of collective goods problems, or – in the short term, at least - instruments for hegemonic business as usual. Even if the G20 proves incapable of facilitating international cooperation in the short-term, some sort of multilateral cooperation is ultimately necessary, we suggest, if the international financial system is to avoid the potential dangers of hegemonic instability

Topics: HG, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2005
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). 5 For an original interpretation of the paradoxical benefits that accrue to the US as a consequence of its indebtedness, see Seabrooke
  2. (1992). A world economy restored: expert consensus and the AngloAmerican postwar settlement’, doi
  3. (2004). American Power and World Order, doi
  4. (2002). Asia’s post-crisis regionalism: Bringing the state back in, keeping the (United) States out’, doi
  5. (2000). Big business and the new trade agreements: The future of the WTO?’,
  6. (1983). Closing the Gold Window: Domestic Politics and the End of Bretton Woods, doi
  7. (2000). Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements, doi
  8. (2003). East Asia, the international financial institutions and regional regulatory reform: A review of the issues’, doi
  9. (2002). East Asian Financial Cooperation, doi
  10. (1993). Eric doi
  11. (1999). France and Japan United Against US Over World Financial System’,
  12. (2005). From G7 to G20: Capacity, leadership and normative diffusion in global financial governance’,
  13. (2000). Global Business Regulation, doi
  14. (2001). Global financial governance and the problem of inclusion’, doi
  15. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents, doi
  16. (1995). Globilization and the changing logic of collective action’, doi
  17. (2003). Going critical: American power and the consequences of fiscal overstretch’,
  18. (2003). Introduction’, doi
  19. (2003). Is East Asia under-represented doi
  20. (1994). Managing the world economy under the Bretton Woods system: An overview’,
  21. (2005). Neoliberalism and East Asia: Resisting the Washington Consensus’, doi
  22. (1987). Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History, doi
  23. (1983). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables’, doi
  24. (2005). Structures, institutions and agency in the models of capitalism debate’,
  25. (2000). The benefits and pitfalls of financial liberalization’, World Bank Policy Paper,
  26. (2002). The Boom and the Bubble, doi
  27. (1998). The capital myth’, doi
  28. (2002). The Clash of Governmentalities: The Fall of the UN Republic and America’s Reach for Imperium, Exploring Imperium, doi
  29. (2003). The discursive demolition of the Asian development model’, doi
  30. (2004). The end of the neo-conservative moment’, doi
  31. (2000). The G-7, the Financial Stability Forum, the G-20, and the
  32. (2004). The G20 and the world economy’, Speech to the Deputies of the G20,
  33. (1998). The Geography of Money, doi
  34. (2001). The International Financial Architecture: What’s New? What’s Missing, doi
  35. (1997). The Liberal moment: Modernity, Security, and the Making of Postwar International Order, doi
  36. (2002). The Paradox of American Power, doi
  37. (2004). The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic, doi
  38. (2002). The terms of the debate: What’s democracy got to do with it?’,
  39. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, doi
  40. (2001). The US role in the long Asian crisis of 1990-2000’, The Political Economy of the East Asian Crisis and Its Aftermath: Tigers
  41. US Economic Relations with East Asia: From Hegemony to Complex Interdependence? Paper for Bush and Asia: America’s Evolving Relations with doi
  42. (2004). US foreign policy and the ‘securitization’ of economic globalization’, doi
  43. (1997). Who Elected the Bankers? Surveillance and Control in the World Economy, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.