Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Conceptualising economic security in an era of globalisation: what does the East Asian experience reveal?

By Helen Sharmini Nesadurai


This paper calls for an alternative conception of economic security beyond conventional neorealist-based understandings. In particular, the paper argues that a notion of economic security that does not take into account the prevailing structural condition of economic globalisation maybe far removed from the realities of contemporary life. Drawing on theoretical insights from International Political Economy, Development Economics and Economic Sociology, the paper makes a case for an alternative conceptualisation of economic secur ity defined as ensuring a low probability of damage to a set of three key economic values: (a) streams of income and consumption necessary for minimal human/family needs; (b) market integrity; and (c) distributive equity. While this alternative understanding of economic security speaks to a wider range of experiences and concerns beyond the world of inter-state rivalry and competition, the paper does not reject neorealist-based frameworks that emphasise the securing of national economic power. Instead, it supports calls for an open-ended or eclectic approach to conceptualising economic security, a methodological stand that acknowledges that a range of understandings, concerns and responses to the problem of economic security exist depending on the historical, political and social contexts of states and their societies as well as the strategic environment in which they find themselves. Studies of the East Asian experience reviewed in this paper attest to the utility of such an approach

Topics: HC, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2005
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). Aart doi
  2. (1993). An Economics Agenda for doi
  3. (1989). ASEAN and the Security of South-East Asia. doi
  4. (1998). Asian Practice of Security: Key Features and Explanations’ doi
  5. (1995). Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution After the Cold War, Washington DC: The Brookings Institutions. doi
  6. (1996). Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods’, doi
  7. (2005). China Confronts Globalisation: Conceptualising Economic Security and Governance’, doi
  8. (1999). Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order’, doi
  9. (2005). Contested Spaces: The Politics of Regional and Global Governance in Southeast Asia’
  10. (2005). Crafting Thailand’s New Social Contract’, doi
  11. (2000). Development Strategies for the Next Century’ from the webpage of Dani Rodrik (
  12. (2005). Does Hegemony Still Matter? Revisiting Regime Formation in the AsiaPacific’,
  13. (2002). E.H. Carr: a historical realist approach for the globalisation era’, doi
  14. (2005). Economic Security in an Era of Globalisation: Definition and Provision’, doi
  15. (1990). From Geo-politics to Geo-economics’, The National Interest,
  16. (1997). From National to Human Security’ in Stuart Harris and Andrew Mack (eds) Asia-Pacific Security: The Economics-Politics Nexus, doi
  17. (2001). Globalisation and its Critics: A Survey of Globalisation’,
  18. (2002). Globalisation and Its Discontents, doi
  19. (2005). Globalisation, Economic Security and Governance: The Case of Indonesia’,
  20. (1997). Globalisation, Social Conflict and Economic Growth, from the webpage of Dani Rodrik ( 26 Rodrik,
  21. (2000). Human and Economic Security: Is There a Nexus?’ in
  22. (1994). Human Development Report, doi
  23. (2001). Human Security: East Versus West?’, doi
  24. (1987). Hunger and Public Action, doi
  25. (2002). Introduction’ in David Held and Anthony McGrew (eds) Governing Globalisation: Power, Authority and Global Governance, doi
  26. (2005). Japan, East Asian Regionalism and the Politics of Human Security’,
  27. (1999). Neo-liberalism or Democracy: Economic Strategy, Markets and Alternatives for the 21 st Century, London and
  28. (1999). New and Old Wars: Organised Violence in a Global Era, Stanford: doi
  29. (2005). Non-State Regional Governance Mechanisms for Economic Security: The Case of the ASEAN People’s Assembly’, doi
  30. (2004). Openness, Welfare Spending and Inequality in the Developing World’, doi
  31. (2001). Performance Legitimacy and “Soft Authoritarianism”’ in Amitav Acharya, B. Michael Frolic and Richard Stubbs (eds) Democracy, Human Rights and Civil Society in Southeast Asia,
  32. (1995). Re-visioning Security’ in Ken Booth and Steve Smith (eds) International Relations Theory Today,
  33. (2002). Redistribution Does Matter: Growth and Redistribution for Poverty Reduction’, doi
  34. (1992). Renaissance in Security Studies? doi
  35. (2002). Rethinking the Southeast Asian Development Model: Bringing Ethical and Governance Questions In’, doi
  36. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis, doi
  37. (2005). Taiwan’s Economic Security: Confronting the Dual Trends of Globalisation and Governance’,
  38. (2001). The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-first Century Capitalist Societies, Princeton and Oxford: doi
  39. (2000). The Asian Turbulence: A Case Study
  40. (1997). The Concept of Security’ doi
  41. (1944). The Great Transformation, doi
  42. (2000). The Mystery of Capital, doi
  43. (2000). The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis, doi
  44. (1991). The Renaissance of Security Studies’, doi
  45. (1997). The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy: A Reader (second edition),
  46. (1995). The Value of Security: Hobbes, Marx, Nietzsche and Baudrillard’
  47. (2005). Track 1/Track 2 Symbiosis in Asia Pacific Regionalism’, doi
  48. (2005). Vietnam’s Economic Security’,
  49. (2005). Wai-Chung (2005) ‘Institutional Capacity and Singapore’s Developmental State: Managing Economic (In)Security in the Global Economy’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.