Location of Repository

Do foreign firms really pay higher wages? : evidence from different estimators

By Pedro S. Martins

Abstract

We contribute to the literature on Foreign Direct Investment and labour markets by examining wage differentials between domestic and foreign firms, drawing on a large Portuguese matched employer-employee panel. Using OLS, the foreign-firm premium is large and significantly positive but falls substantially when firm and worker controls are added. Moreover, the premium also does not vary monotonically with foreign control, increases along the wage distribution and is generally insignificant when using propensity score matching (PSM). Finally, using differences-in-differences (DID), we find lower wage growth for workers in domestic firms that are acquired by foreign investors, a result that holds when combining DID and PSM. Overall, our evidence suggests that the commonly-documented OLS premium cannot be interpreted as a causal impact

Topics: HD
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1968

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000). Agglomeration and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in Portugal”, doi
  2. (1988). Breach of Trust in Hostile Take-Overs”, in A. Auerbach (ed) Corporate Take-Overs: Causes and Consequences,
  3. (2003). Characteristics of Foreign-Owned Firms doi
  4. (2003). Disentangling the Minimum Wage Puzzle: An Analysis of Worker Accessions and Separations”, doi
  5. (2003). Do Workers in Africa Get a Wage Premium if Employed in Firms Owned by Foreigners?”, doi
  6. (2004). Evaluating the Employment Impact of a Mandatory Job Search Assistance Program”, doi
  7. (1999). Firm Size and Wages”, doi
  8. (2003). Firm Wage Differentials in a Competitive Industry: Some Matched-Panel Evidence”, doi
  9. (1997). Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico’s Maquiladoras”, doi
  10. (2001). Foreign Direct Investments and Spillovers Through Workers' Mobility", doi
  11. (2003). Foreign Firms and Indonesian Wages: A Panel Study”, doi
  12. (1999). Foreign Ownership and Wages in the United States, doi
  13. (2004). Industry Wage Dispersion: Evidence from the Wage Distribution”, doi
  14. (2003). International Acquisitions in the Danish Business: Selection and Performance”,
  15. (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme”, doi
  16. (2004). Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment”, World Bank Research Observer, doi
  17. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, 2 nd edition, doi
  18. (2002). On the Determinants of Multinationals Ownership Preferences: Evidence from Greece and Portugal”, doi
  19. (2003). Portugal no Espaço Europeu:
  20. (2003). Rent Sharing and Foreign Ownership”, doi
  21. (2004). Rent Sharing Before and After the Wage Bill”, doi
  22. (1990). The Effect of Ownership Change on the Employment and Wages of Central-Office and Other Personnel”, doi
  23. (2003). The Effects of Foreign Owned Firms on the Labor Market”, doi
  24. (1989). The Employer Size-Wage Effect”, doi
  25. (2002). The Experience of Work. Is Working for an Overseas-Owned Multinational So Different?”, doi
  26. (2002). The Productivity and Wage Effects of Foreign Acquisition in the United Kingdom”, doi
  27. (1997). The Role of Multinational Firms in the Wage-Gap Debate”, doi
  28. (2002). The Survival of New Domestic and Foreign Owned Firms”, doi
  29. (1977). Trade, Location of Economic Activity and the MNEs”, in
  30. (1996). Wages and Foreign Ownership. A Comparative Study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States”, doi
  31. (2001). What Hides Behind an Unemployment Rate: Comparing Portuguese and U.S. doi
  32. (2002). Why do Foreign-Owned Firms Pay More? The Role of On-the-Job Training”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.