Location of Repository

One or many Kuznets curves? Short and long run effects of the impact of skill-biased technological change on income inequality

By Gianluca Grimalda and Marco Vivarelli


We draw on a dynamical two-sector model and on a calibration exercise to study the impact of a skill-biased technological shock on the growth path and income distribution of a developing economy. The model builds on the theoretical framework developed by Silverberg and Verspagen (1995) and on the idea of localised technological change (Atkinson and Stiglitz, 1969) with sector-level increasing returns to scale. We find that a scenario of catching-up to the high-growth steady state is predictable for those economies starting off with a high enough endowment of skilled workforce. During the transition phase, if the skill upgrade process for the workforce is relatively slow, the typical inverse-U Kuznets pattern emerges for income inequality in the long run. Small-scale Kuznets curves, driven by sectoral business cycles, may also be detected in the short run. Conversely, economies initially suffering from significant skill shortages remain trapped in a low-growth steady state. Although the long-term trend is one of decreasing inequality, small-scale Kuznets curves may be detected even in this case, which may cause problems of observational equivalence between the two scenarios for the policy-maker. The underlying factors of inequality, and the evolution of a more comprehensive measure of inequality than the one normally used, are also analysed

Topics: HD
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1970

Suggested articles



  1. (1996). A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality’, The World Bank Economic Review, doi
  2. (2000). Ability-Biased Technological Transition, Wage Inequality and Economic Growth, doi
  3. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, doi
  4. (2003). Democracy, Economic Openness, and Income Inequality: An Empirical Analysis’, doi
  5. (1995). Evolutionary Game Theory, Mit Press, doi
  6. (1997). Financial Development, Growth and the Distribution of Income, doi
  7. (2004). Globalization, Skill-Biased Technological Change and Labour Demand, doi
  8. (1990). Growth and Inequality in the Dual Model of Development: The Role of Demand Factors, doi
  9. (2001). Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Looking beyond Averages, mimeo, Development Research Group, The World Bank, doi
  10. (1996). HOS Hits Facts: Facts Win; Evidence on Trade and Wages in the Developing World, Development Discussion Paper no. 557,
  11. (1976). Income Distribution and Development,
  12. (1999). Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories, doi
  13. (2000). Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries, doi
  14. (2000). Skill-Biased Technology Transfer around the World, doi
  15. (1998). Technology and Changes in the Skill Structure: Evidence from Seven OECD Countries, doi
  16. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates,
  17. (2002). The Disturbing ‘Rise’ of Global Income Inequality, NBER Working Paper no. 8904, National Bureau of Economic Research, doi
  18. (1995). The Economics of Localized Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics. doi
  19. (2004). The Employment Impact o f Globalisation in Developing Countries,
  20. (1993). The Kuznets Process and the InequalityDevelopment Relationship, doi
  21. (2001). The Simultaneous Evolution of Growth and Inequality, mimeo, The World Bank,
  22. (2001). Trends in Income Distribution in the Post-World War II Period, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.