Location of Repository

Corporate social responsibility: a myth? The example of the 'Round Table Codes of Conduct' in Germany

By Stefanie Hiss

Abstract

This paper is concerned with why and how multinational companies (MNCs) voluntarily engage in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), especially in social standards.\ud \ud The first part describes the prevailing perspectives on the CSR debate. Then, with the New Institutionalism in Sociology, an alternative view on CSR is discussed. The third part develops the argument that the ‘traditional’ rational institutional myth developed by Meyer and Rowan should be replaced or supplemented by a CSR myth. After that, the case study of “Round Table Codes of Conduct” provides an example of how MNCs deal with this emerging CSR myth

Topics: HD
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:1974

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2000). Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development. doi
  2. (2003). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Social Responsibility: Between Agency and Communion. doi
  3. (2001). Environmental and Social Responsibility Rhetoric of Nike and Reebook.
  4. (2002). Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. doi
  5. (2004). Global Compact Office. N.d. The Global Compact. Online, HTTP: http://www.unglobalcompact.org (accessed 25
  6. (2001). Global Rules for Trade: Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling, Workers` Rights Clauses.
  7. (2002). Institutionalistische Ansätze in der Organisationstheorie. doi
  8. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. doi
  9. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism.
  10. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory.
  11. (2002). Making Sense of Global Standards, doi
  12. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. doi
  13. (1989). Permanently Failing Organizations. Newbury Park/ California et al.: doi
  14. (2001). Self-regulation in the workplace: Codes of conduct, social labelling and socially responsible investment. Working Paper No.1.
  15. (1984). Social Responsibility of Management. doi
  16. (2004). Social Standards in the Global Economy. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).
  17. (2004). Socially Responsible Investment: A Global Revolution. doi
  18. (1998). Sozialklauseln, Arbeiterrechte im Welthandel.
  19. (1991). Strategic Responses to institutional processes. doi
  20. (2004). Table Codes of Conduct.
  21. (2001). The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, Policy Brief June. doi
  22. (2003). The Promise and Perils of Globalization: The Case of Nike.
  23. (2004). The Role of Multilateral Development Institutions in Fostering Corporate Social Responsibility. Study of the Inter-American Development Bank. Online, HTTP: http://www.iadb.org/csramericas/doc/multilaterals.pdf (accessed 29
  24. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. doi
  25. (1991). The Structural Transformation of American Industry: An Institutional Account of the Causes of Diversification in the Largest Firms,
  26. (1992). The Structure of Educational Organizations. doi
  27. (2004). Trading away our rights: Women working in global supply chains.
  28. (1991). Unpacking Institutional Arguments.
  29. (2003). Workers’ tool or PR ploy? A guide to codes of international labour practice,
  30. (1995). World Development Report: Workers in an Integrating World. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.