Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Towards an East Asian community? What ASEM and APEC can tell us

By Nuria Okfen

Abstract

The idea of an East Asian community is not a new one. Since the 1990s, it has gained considerable influence among regional policy makers. The initiation of the ASEAN 3 process as well as the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMI) indicate that Northeast and Southeast Asians have begun to formulate their own co-operative mechanisms of regional self-help. However, the rapid proliferation of bilateral and sub-regional preferential trade agreements in recent years does not correspond to the logic of building a collective East Asian identity. This paper examines the origins of the major barriers to community-building in East Asia. It challenges the common wisdom derived from constructivist theory that East Asia's political integration and its collective identity will evolve more or less automatically as long as East Asians interact with one another on various levels and through various channels and by adhering to shared norms

Topics: HC, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2002

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). ASEAN and ASEAN Plus Three in Postcrisis Asia",
  2. (2002). ASEAN plus Three: Emerging East Asian Regionalism?", doi
  3. (2000). ASEM and Trade Issues", Conference Paper presented to the Seoul Summit The Way Ahead for the Asia-Europe Partnership,
  4. (2002). Asian multilateral institutions and their response to the Asian economic crisis", doi
  5. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State", doi
  6. (1995). Competing Conceptions of Economic Regionalism: APEC versus EAEC in the Asia Pacific", doi
  7. (1995). Contract and Regimes: Do issue specifictiy and variations of formality matter?",
  8. (2000). Der neue Westen. Der Handelskonflikt zwischen den
  9. (2002). East Asian Regionalism: A look at the "ASEAN plus Three" framework",
  10. (2000). Europe Meets Asia: "Old" versus "New" Inter-Regional Cooperation and ASEM's Prospects", working paper no. 22,
  11. (2002). Exploring alternative theories of economic regionalism: From trade to finance in Asian co-operation", doi
  12. (1997). Fleeing the West, Making Asia Home: Transpositions of otherness in Japanese Pan-Asianism,1905-1930",
  13. (1997). Japan's postwar history, doi
  14. (1999). Joint Statement on East Asia Cooperation,
  15. (2000). Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case", doi
  16. (1999). Miracle to Meltdown in Asia: Business, Government, and Society. doi
  17. (1996). Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security",
  18. (1999). Progress towards an East Asia free trade area",
  19. (1994). Reflexivität in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Ein Literaturbericht zum Beitrag kognitiver, reflexiver und interpretativer Ansätze zur dritten Theoriedebatte",
  20. (1989). Regime in den internationalen Beziehungen, doi
  21. (2002). Regions in comparative perspective", doi
  22. (1987). Sun Yat-sen and pan-Asianism",
  23. (1992). The Asia-Pacific Idea: Reality and Representation in the Invention of a Regional Structure",
  24. (1998). The Asia-Pacific: What sort of region in what sort of world?",
  25. (1999). The Asian Crisis and the Adequacy of Regional Institutions", doi
  26. (1998). The Asian Economic Crisis: A Study in the Politics of Resentment", doi
  27. (2001). The Development of ASEAN-Norms Between
  28. (2001). The Discourse of Civilization and Pan-Asianism", doi
  29. (1998). The international political economy of regionalism: the Asia-Pacific and Europe compared", in doi
  30. Victor J.(1997) "Asianism's Ambivalent Legacy", in Katzenstein, Peter; Shiraishi, Takashi (eds) Network Power: Japan and
  31. (2000). Whither ASEM? Lessons from APEC and the Future of Transregional Cooperation between Asia and Europe",

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.