Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The relevance of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem to the trade and wages debate

By Lisandro Abrego and T. Huw Edwards


In this paper we investigate the powerful implications of the Stolper-Samuelson theorem, which uses the Heckscher-Ohlin model to predict strong links between changing trade prices and wage inequalities. We summarise recent work, which shows that these theoretical links are, in fact, far stronger than indicated by empirical evidence or simplified reduced-form regressions. We point out that the literature outlines many reasons to doubt the validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin model, and summarise various general equilibrium studies of advanced countries which indicate that relaxation of the assumptions of the Heckscher-Ohlin model can greatly undermine the Stolper-Samuelson conclusions. We conclude that, while increased trade with developing countries has probably played some part in the widening wage inequalities in the UK and USA, there is considerable doubt over how large this role is. There are good reasons for believing that, contrary to the usual conclusions of the Stolper-Samuelson literature, policies to assist the upskilling of the labour force have considerable potential in offsetting any negative effects of trade on wage inequality

Topics: HF, HD
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2002
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. A and R.Riezman (2000): “Understanding the Welfare Implications of Preferential Trade Agreements”, Working Paper 45/99, CSGR, doi
  2. (1994). An Overview of Changing Wage Patterns in the Labour Market,”
  3. (1992). Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors”, doi
  4. (2001). Decomposing wage inequality using general equilibrium models”. mimeo, doi
  5. (1998). Does the Sector Bias of Skilled-Biased Technical Change Explains Changing Wage Inequality?'' doi
  6. (1999). Globalization and Wages: A Tale of Two Perspectives World doi
  7. (1998). In Search of Stolper-Samuelson Linkages between International Trade and Lower Wages.” doi
  8. (1997). Input-Output Balances for the UK.
  9. (1993). International Trade and American Wages in the 1980s: Giant Sucking Sound or Small Hiccup?” in M.N.Baily and C.Winston (eds) Exports, Imports and the American Worker, Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
  10. (1995). International Trade Theory: The Evidence'', doi
  11. (2000). Labour market institutions and decomposition of wage inequality outcomes”, mimeo,
  12. (1985). Market Structure and International Trade: increasing returns, foreign competition”. doi
  13. (1994). North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality, doi
  14. (1996). Office for National Statistics: (1981-82), Employment Gazette (various issues).
  15. (1992). On the Labour Market Implications of Immigration and Trade”, doi
  16. (1989). Product Differentiation and the Treatment of Foreign Trade doi
  17. (1941). Protection and real wages”, doi
  18. (1997). Shifts in US Relative Wages: The Role of Trade, Technology and Factor Endowments,” doi
  19. Short and Long Run Decompositions of OECD Wage Inequality Changes”, doi
  20. (1974). Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium for a Small Open Economy'. doi
  21. (1978). Short-Run Capital Specificity and the Pure Theory of International Trade'. doi
  22. (1974). Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: The Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, and Intensity in the Short and Long Run.” doi
  23. (2000). Technology, Trade and Factor Prices” doi
  24. (1997). Technology, Unemployment and Wages in a Global Economy', European Economic Review, doi
  25. (1995). The OECD Input-Output Database. doi
  26. (1999). US Wages in General Equilibrium: The Effects of Prices, Technology, and Factor Supplies, doi
  27. (1989). Wage Premiums for College Graduates: Recent Growth and Possible Explanations.” doi
  28. What Drove Relative Wages in France? Structural Decomposition Analysis in a General Equilibrium Framework, 1970-1992”. Working paper 2000-03, CEPII,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.