Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

IR, area studies and IPE: rethinking the study of China's international relations

By Shaun Breslin

Abstract

This paper attempts to provide a new framework of analysis for understanding China’s international relations. It argues that “traditional” conceptions of international relations, based on “statist” and “realist” methodology, do not capture the dynamics of China’s international relations in an era of globalisation. Rather, we need to consider the analytical tools of international political economy as a means of breaking down the analytical barriers between the domestic and the international, and between politics and economics. At the same time as enriching the study of China, such an approach can also enrich the discipline of international political economy, by breaking away from the OECD-centric nature of much research in the field

Topics: JZ, DS
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2024

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2002). (Still) Learning to Live Without the Plan: The Politics of Financial Reform in the People’s Republic of China’ doi
  2. (1997). 10. This citation taken from Cumings
  3. (1998). A Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments doi
  4. (1999). and Grahame Thompson doi
  5. (1995). Beyond Product Cycles and Flying Geese: Regionalization, Hierarchy, doi
  6. (1996). Boot Camp at the Show Factory: Regimented Workers in China's Free Labour Market’ The Washington Post 3 Nov, and Anita Chan
  7. (2001). Building International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics’ doi
  8. (1998). China doi
  9. (1999). Chinese Perspectives on International Relations doi
  10. (1999). Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative’, doi
  11. (2000). Cosmopolitan Capitalists (Seattle: doi
  12. (1997). De Facto and De Jure Regionalism: The Double Discourse of Regionalism in the Asia Pacific’ doi
  13. (1997). Democratization (Oxford:
  14. (1995). Developmental Communities” on China's Coast: The Impact of Trade, doi
  15. (1999). Divergent Capitalisms - The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems (Oxford: doi
  16. (1999). Embedding the Global in the National: Implications for the Role of the State’ doi
  17. (1999). Engaging China doi
  18. (1992). Even if the role of non-state actors is less in China than Haas envisaged in discussing the growing complexity of policy making in Peter Haas
  19. (1996). example, the special issue of The Third World Quarterly Vol
  20. (1999). Examples of this pre-WTO literature include Margaret Pearson
  21. (1995). Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism In doi
  22. (1999). Feiling and Yong Deng
  23. (1999). Feiling and Yong Deng (eds)
  24. (1998). For a description of different approaches, see Richard Higgott and Simon Reich
  25. (2002). For a good recent account of the literature on globalisation and the state, see John Hobson and M Ramesh
  26. (2001). For a wider discussion of the differences between US and UK IPE, see Craig Murphy and Douglas Nelson
  27. (1995). Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism’ doi
  28. (1999). Globalization, Regionalization, and Inequality’ doi
  29. (2000). I have explored this in more detail in Shaun Breslin
  30. Ian Taylor ‘Globalisation’ doi
  31. (2000). Ianchovichina and Emiko Fukase doi
  32. ie: components producers moving to China to follow their key partners.
  33. (2001). International Political Economy from a Chinese Angle’ doi
  34. (2000). International Relations Theory In China’ in Weixing Hu, Gerald Chan and Daojiong Zha doi
  35. (1984). Introduction: Global Commodity Chains’, doi
  36. (1996). Introduction: The Political Economy of Regionalism and World Order’ in Andrew Gamble and Anthony Payne (eds) Regionalism and World Order (Basingstoke: doi
  37. (1997). Japan-Taiwan Relations, 1972-199 : Virtual Diplomacy And The Separation Of Politics And Economics (University of Newcastle upon Tyne PhD)
  38. (1998). Japan’s Role in Microregionalism: The Yellow Sea Economic Zone. Unpublished manuscript. Glenn Hook
  39. (1995). Macmillan); and Susan Young
  40. (2000). Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era doi
  41. (2000). New Regionalisms in Africa in the New Millennium: comparative perspectives on renaissance, realisms and/or regressions’ doi
  42. (1998). op cit
  43. (2000). op cit p:
  44. (1996). op cit p:6.
  45. (1997). op cit.
  46. (1998). Perhaps the best account of the process by which the perty state elites have ‘captured’ many of the benefits of reform is He Qinglian
  47. (1997). Political Economy of Modern Capitalism : Mapping Convergence and Diversity doi
  48. (1990). Power, Production and World Order doi
  49. (1997). Preconception vs. Observation, or the Contribution of Rational Choice Theory and doi
  50. (1997). Privatisation In China: Something to Learn From (Rotterdam: Erasmus University Management Report No 2); Chan
  51. (1996). Reflections on the Recent Tension in doi
  52. (1999). Rethinking the ‘New Regionalism’ in the Context of Globalisation’ in Björn Hettne, András Inotai and Osvaldo Sunkel (eds.), Globalism and the New Regionalism (London: Macmillan) p:28; Bjorn Hettne doi
  53. Smith’s various papers on this theme.
  54. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International relations Theory’ in Millennium (10); Robert Cox doi
  55. (2002). Something we tried to redress in Breslin and Hook
  56. (1964). speech at John Hopkins, quoted in Sigmund Diamond, Compromised Campus:
  57. (2001). Study Commission (Select Committee)
  58. (2000). The ‘English School’ doi
  59. (1997). The China Circle :
  60. (1994). The classic remains Susan Strange
  61. (2000). The emergence of Local Capitalisms in China: Overseas Chinese Investment and Pattern of Development’ in Si–Ming Li and Wing-Shing Tang (eds) China’s Regions, Polity, & Economy: A Study of Spatial Transformation in the Post-Reform Era (Hong Kong: UHKP) doi
  62. (1995). The End of the Nation State, doi
  63. (2001). The Implications of China’s Accession to the World Trade Organisation’ paper presented at Japan and China: Economic Relations in Transition
  64. (1990). The Name of the Game’ in Nicholas Rizopoulos (ed.) Sea-Changes: American Foreign Policy in a World Transformed (New York: Council on Foreign Relations). doi
  65. (2001). The New Crowd of the Dispossessed: Factory Layoffs and the Informalization of the Urban Economy (University of Warwick Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation Working Paper 81/01).
  66. (1998). The New Political
  67. The requirement to publish within disciplinary journals for career enhancement provides an important part of the explanation here.
  68. (1996). The Retreat of the State (Cambridge: doi
  69. (2000). The U.S.-China WTO Agreement Will Help Promote Reform, Accountability, and Openness
  70. (1991). The United States and Asia: Future Prospects’ Foreign Affairs, doi
  71. (1994). Wake up Krasner! The world has changed’ doi
  72. (1998). while area studies clearly benefit from being embedded in theory and comparison, the theory itself might benefit from being exposed to case studies other than just Europe and North America. Payne
  73. (2000). Who act as negotiators. See Glenn Hook
  74. (1995). Whose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War (Boulder: Westview Press); Andrew Hurrell and Ngaire Woods (eds) doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.