Location of Repository

Exploring alternative theories of economic regionalism: from trade to finance in Asian co-operation

By Heribert Dieter and Richard A. Higgott

Abstract

The financial crises of the late 1990s marked an intellectual watershed for the global economy, and also for regionalism as the Janus face of globalisation. At the beginning of the 21st century, the theory and practice of regional cooperation and integration may evolve along different lines to how it was understood for most of the second half of the 20th century. In East Asia, in particular, this will mean that the relationship between multilateralism and regionalism will change. The ‘East Asian’ region will become an increasingly important domain within which to explore enhanced protection against financial crises. What we might call ‘monetary regionalism’, sceptical western voices notwithstanding, is now firmly on the regional agenda in East Asia.\ud \ud Within conventional political economy, the theory and practice of monetary regionalism is not as easy to understand as traditional trade driven regional integration. Thus one aim of this paper is to outline a theory of monetary regionalism and demonstrate the degree to which it represents a sharp break with understandings of the regional project that pertained in East Asia prior to the late 1990s.\ud \ud From its start in 1989, APEC claimed to be a new type of regionalism. The promise was that APEC would promote open regionalism, i.e. the development of an approach to regional integration that would not harm the multilateral trading order. APEC, despite substantial peer pressure, did not achieve this goal. That APEC played any significant role in the advancement of regional trade integration cannot be proven. What can be said, however, is that it provided no support to its Asian members during the financial crises of the late 1990s.\ud \ud At the same time, more traditional (what we might call Balassian) understandings of trade driven regional integration are not showing any sign of decreasing importance, To the contrary, there is a growing appeal of trade co-operation, notably an increasing interest in bilateral preferential trading arrangements. This leads to a complex picture of competing regional initiatives across the economic policy spectrum. The paper locates these initiatives in the wider context of the growing politico-economic dialogue between Southeast and Northeast Asia that has developed via the ASEAN 3 process since 1997

Topics: HC, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2029

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1997a): Mondialisation et Gouvernance: l’Emergence du Niveau Regional. doi
  2. (1997c): De Facto and De Jure Regionalism: The Double Discourse of Regionalism in the Pacific. doi
  3. (2001). A Costly Pursuit of Free Trade, doi
  4. (2000). A Framework for Regional Monetary Stabilization.
  5. (1998). A Second American Century. doi
  6. (2000). A Setting Sun? Foreign Affairs, doi
  7. (2000). After the Crisis: Beyond Liberalisation in the Asia Pacific? The Pacific
  8. (2000). APEC adrift: implications for economic regionalism in Asia and the Pacific. The Pacific Review, doi
  9. (1994). APEC: A Sceptical View.
  10. (2000). ASEAN and ASEAN+3. doi
  11. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. doi
  12. (2000). ASEAN and the Idea of an Asian Monetary Fund: Institutional Uncertainty in the Asia
  13. (2000). ASEM and the Evolving World Order. doi
  14. (2000). ASEM: Looking Forward, Looking Backward. doi
  15. (2000). Contested Globalisation: New Normative Agendas. doi
  16. (2001). Die ASEAN vor dem Ende. Le Monde Diplomatique, Februar
  17. (1998). Die Asienkrise: Ursachen, Konsequenzen und die Politik des Internationalen Währungsfonds. doi
  18. (2000). East Asian Regionalism: Towards a Tripartite World.
  19. (2000). EC Regionalism at the Turn of the Millenium: Toward a new 43 Paradigm? The World Economy, doi
  20. (1995). Economic Cooperation in Europe and Asia: A Preliminary Comparison.
  21. (1987). Economic Integration. In: doi
  22. (1998). European Monetary Integration. doi
  23. (2001). Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct? doi
  24. (1997). Institutions, Identity and Social Learning in the International Political Economy of Regionalism: Asia and Europe Compared. Kokusai Seiji:
  25. (2001). Integrate to Meet the Challenges of Globalization. Paper presented at the First ASEM Roundtable on ‘Globalization and Regional Responses’, Seoul,
  26. (1996). International Monetary Cooperation since Bretton Woods. New York and Oxford: doi
  27. (2000). Monetary Regionalism: Regional Integration without Financial Crises. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR) Working Paper 52/00. 41 Dieter, doi
  28. (1999). On Regional Monetary Arrangements in ASEAN. Conference on Exchange Rate Arrangements in Asia, Tokyo, Asian Development Bank/Korean Institute of Economic Planning Conference,
  29. (1997). Optimum Currency Areas and Exchange Rate Variability: Theory and Evidence. doi
  30. (1997). Ostasien und der Westen: Globalisierung oder Regionalisierung?
  31. (2001). Ostasiens Weg in eine Währungsunion.
  32. (1999). Progress Toward an East Asian Free Trade Area.
  33. (2001). Reform of the International Financial System and Institutions in Light of the Asian Financial Crisis. UNCTAD/Harvard Kennedy School, Working Paper
  34. (2001). Regional Trading Arrangements and the Global Economy: An Asia Pacific Perspective,
  35. (2000). Regionalism and Asia. doi
  36. (2000). Resisting Triumphalism and Convergence: The Limits of Liberalisation in Asia and Latin America. doi
  37. (2000). Signing on to liberalization: AFTA and the politics of regional economic cooperation. doi
  38. (2000). Studying Regions: Learning from the Old, Constructing the New’, doi
  39. (1998). The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model vs the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex.
  40. (2000). The Asian Financial Crisis and Its Aftermath. Do We Need a Regional Financial Arrangement? doi
  41. (1998). The Asian Financial Crisis: A Study in the International Politics of Resentment. doi
  42. (2001). The Foundations of Stability.
  43. (2000). The New Monetary Regionalism: The East Asian Financial Caucus Takes Shape, The Financial Times,
  44. (2000). The Regional Response in Asia-Pacific and its Global Implications. The Pacific Review, doi
  45. (2000). The Role of the IMF: A Guide to the Reports. Institute for Internationale Economics, Policy Briefs,
  46. (1961). The Theory of Economic Integration. doi
  47. (2001). Two Funerals and a Wedding? The Ups and Downs of Regionalism in East Asia and the Asia Pacific after the Asian crisis. doi
  48. (2001). Undermining the WTO: The Case Against ‘Open Sectoralism’. Asia Pacific Issues,
  49. (1998). Verlierer Japan, Gewinner China? Außenpolitische Konsequenzen der Asienkrise.
  50. (2000). Vom Goldstandard zum Euro. Die Geschichte des internationalen Währungssystems.
  51. (2000). What I learned at the world economic crisis. The New Republic,
  52. Yunjong (2000): Regional Arrangements to Borrow: A Scheme for Preventing Future Asian Liquidity Crises. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Policy Analysis 00-01.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.