Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Creating globalisation: 'patriotic internationalism' and symbiotic power relations in the Post-WW2 era

By Jim George

Abstract

This paper engages a number of important and complex questions on the contemporary Globalisation agenda. In the first instance it is concerned with the question of what globalisation actually means. It confronts this issue in both conventional terms (i.e. the current debate over ‘meaning’ which generally pits neo-liberal perspectives against a variety of critical alternatives) and in terms of a broader historical and intellectual frame of reference which, it suggests, is a more appropriate context for the debate. The suggestion, more precisely, is that the globalisation phenomenon of the current era, is best understood in terms of some fundamental organising principles drawn from a modern international political economy (IPE) agenda in which (the major) states and an advanced, expansionist brand of capitalism continue to dominate, albeit as part of a significantly reformulated symbiotic power relationship. The second and primary focus of the paper is concerned to illustrate how this traditional symbiosis actually works at the core of contemporary globalisation, in theory and practice. It does so in concentrating on that period between 1945 and the present when, it is suggested, a series of policy decisions taken by the USA at Bretton-Woods, in order to retain and enhance its post-WW2 systemic advantages, were intrinsic also to the breakdown of the Bretton-Woods system, the development of increasingly deregulated economic sector by the mid-1970s, the ‘casino capitalism’ of the 1980s and the coherent neo-liberal agenda of the 1990s which, in the post-Cold War years has invoked a new era of liberal free-market economics as the keystone of global peace and prosperity in the future. Rejecting the one-sidedness of this perspective the paper maintains that a symbiosis of the political and the economic still characterises the age of neo-liberal dominance. That, indeed, the notion of independent economic forces imposing themselves upon effectively impotent state actors misses the historical, political and ideological point about the nature of systemic agency and structure in the modern IPE. It seeks, in this regard, to illustrate how a major capitalist state, such as the USA, is intrinsically connected to the ‘economic’ success of the neo-liberal globalist agenda, and how its ostensibly independent ‘economic’ agenda is, if anything, increasingly dependent upon a Triad of major states (i.e. centred on the U.S., the E.U and Japan) for support, sustenance and profit. The brief final section of the paper touches on some of the possible implications of this scenario for the global future

Topics: JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2001
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2059

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade, doi
  2. (1987). Agriculture in England: A Survey of Farming, 1870-1947, doi
  3. (1997). Anglo-German Productivity Differences 1870-1990: A Sectoral Analysis”, doi
  4. (1935). Annual Survey of Economic Theory: The Theory of Monopoly”, doi
  5. (1991). Are Output Fluctuations in the UK Transitory or Permanent?”, doi
  6. (1996). Britain’s Industrial Performance since 1960: Underinvestment and Relative Decline”, doi
  7. (1992). Britain’s Productivity Gap in the 1930s: Some Neglected Factors”, doi
  8. (1994). British Agriculture, 1860-1914”,
  9. (1988). British Historical Statistics, (second edition) Cambridge:
  10. (1972). British Monetary Policy, 1924-1931: The Norman Conquest of $4.86, Cambridge: doi
  11. (1952). British Overseas Trade: From 1700 to the 1930s, doi
  12. (1994). Changing Fortunes: An Industry
  13. (1948). Comparative Productivity in British and American Industry, Cambridge: doi
  14. (1996). Convergence and Deferred Catch-up”,
  15. (1965). Das Wachstum der deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts, doi
  16. (1996). Discontinuities in Competitiveness: The Impact of the doi
  17. (1916). Economic Protection, Oxford: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and
  18. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory, doi
  19. (1998). English Bank Development within a European Context, 1870-1939”, doi
  20. (1989). European Trade Policy, 1815-1914”, doi
  21. (1997). Forging Ahead, Falling Behind and Catching-Up: A Sectoral Analysis doi
  22. (1933). Great Britain and the German Trade Rivalry, doi
  23. (1998). How did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain? A Sectoral Analysis of Comparative Productivity Levels, 1870-1990”, doi
  24. (1970). Imperial Chemical Industries: A History, Vol.1: The Forerunners, 1870-1926, doi
  25. (1994). Industrial and Commercial Performance Since 1950”,
  26. (1987). Industrial Structure, Capital Markets and the Origins of British Economic Decline, Cambridge: doi
  27. (1992). International Financial Markets: The Performance of Britain and its Rivals, Cambridge: doi
  28. (1993). Manufacturing and the Convergence Hypothesis: What the Long Run Data Show”, doi
  29. (2000). Manufacturing”, doi
  30. (1972). National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855-1965, Cambridge: doi
  31. (1982). Overseas Investment in the Age of High Imperialism: The United Kingdom, 1850-1914, doi
  32. (1961). Productivity Trends in the United States, doi
  33. (1990). Protectionism and Economic Revival: The British Interwar Economy, Cambridge: doi
  34. (1973). Reinterpreting Economic Growth:
  35. (1994). Tariffs and Growth: Some Insights from the World Economy, 1850-1940, Manchester: doi
  36. (1978). The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Volume VIII, 1914-1939, Cambridge: doi
  37. (1986). The British Economy Between the Wars: A Macroeconomic Survey, doi
  38. (1992). The British Economy since 1945: Economic Policy and Performance, 1945-1990, doi
  39. (1939). The Carrying Trade of the British Shipping”, doi
  40. (1986). The City and Industrial Decline”,
  41. (1980). The Decline of the British Motor Industry: The Effects of Government Policy, doi
  42. (1978). The Economic Development of the British Coal Industry: From the Industrial Revolution to the Present Day, doi
  43. (1994). The Economics of the European Community, Fourth Edition, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  44. (1963). The Economics of the Wartime Shortage: A History of British Food Supplies in the Napoleonic War and in World Wars I and II, doi
  45. (1989). The estimation of prewar Gross National Product: Methodology and New Evidence”, doi
  46. (1992). The Fading Miracle: Four Decades of Market Economy in Germany, Cambridge: doi
  47. (1986). The History of the British Coal Industry, doi
  48. (1990). The Impact of the Depression of the 1930s on Productive Potential in the United Kingdom”, doi
  49. (1965). The Management of the British Economy, 1945-60, Cambridge: doi
  50. (1994). The Outstanding Potential Market: The British Motor Industry and Europe, doi
  51. (1997). The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850-1990, Cambridge: doi
  52. The Tariff History of the United States, doi
  53. (1984). The Wasting of the British Economy: British Economic Policy doi
  54. (1991). Trade and the Balance of Payments”,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.