Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Small countries and preferential trade agreements 'How severe is the innocent bystander problem?'

By M. Ayhan Kose and Raymond Glenn Riezman

Abstract

This paper examines the welfare implications of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) from the perspective of small countries in the context of a multi-country, general equilibrium model. We calibrate our model to represent one relatively small country and two symmetric big countries. We consider two cases. In one case, the small country is an "innocent bystander," that is, it is left out of a PTA between the two large countries. In the second case, the small country signs a PTA with one of the large countries. We simulate the model and calculate consumption allocations, prices, trade volume, and tariffs in these two cases considering three different equilibria: Free Trade (FT), Free Trade Area (FTA), and Customs Union (CU). We find that free trade is the best outcome for the small country. If the large country PTA takes the form of a CU then the cost of being an "innocent bystander" is very large. If it is a FTA then the cost of being an "innocent bystander" is relatively modest. In fact, the small country prefers to be an "innocent bystander" to being a member of a FTA with one of the large countries

Topics: HF
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 2000
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2077

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1987). 1991b, Is bilateralism bad?,
  2. (1991). Commodity trade and International risk sharing: How much do Financial Markets Matter?, doi
  3. (1999). Customs unions and comparative advantage, doi
  4. (1985). Customs unions and the core, doi
  5. (1988). Do big countries win tariff wars?, doi
  6. (1993). Endogenous protection and trade diversion, doi
  7. (1993). Expanding E.C. membership and association accords: recent experience and future prospects,
  8. (1996). How severe is global retaliation risk under increasing regionalism?,
  9. (1993). New dimensions in regional integration, doi
  10. (1990). Optimal tariff equilibria with customs unions, doi
  11. (1996). Regionalism in a multilateral world, mimeo, doi
  12. (1996). Some welfare effects of sequential customs union formation, doi
  13. (1991). The move toward free trade zones, in Policy Implications of Trade and Currency Zones. A symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
  14. (1996). The size of trading blocs: Market power and world welfare effects, doi
  15. (1999). Understanding the welfare implications of preferential trade agreements, forthcoming, doi
  16. (1999). Welfare and customs unions, forthcoming, doi
  17. (1998). Why do countries seek regional trade agreements?, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.