Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Localism in Thailand: a study of globalisation and its discontents

By Kevin Hewison


Recent work has suggested that the discontent over perceived negative impacts arising from liberalisation and globalisation needs to be more carefully considered. The critiques emanating from non-governmental organisations and social movements are considered to be amongst the most significant. This paper examines one example of such criticism – localism – that emerged during the economic crisis in Thailand. This example of localism is found to be an example of populist reaction to the changes and inequalities generated by capitalist industrialisation. The paper assesses this critique, its political strength and its potential to provide an alternative economic model for Thailand. While providing a useful moral argument regarding the impact of neoliberal globalisation, populist localism is unable to develop a sound alternative model

Topics: JZ, DS
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 1999
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1996). Alternative Agriculture: Act Now!’,
  2. (1998). Alternative Meanings of Political Development in Thailand’, doi
  3. (1986). Back to the Roots. Village and Self-Reliance in a Thai Context, Bangkok: Rural Development Documentation Centre.
  4. (1997). Contextualising Globalisation: Comments on Du Boff and Herman’, doi
  5. (1999). Developing Social Alternatives: Walking Backwards into a Klong’, Paper presented to the Thai Update, Canberra, The Australian National University,
  6. (1982). Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective, doi
  7. (1989). Development Paradigm. Strategy, Activities and Reflection,
  8. (1998). Economic Development and Institutional Failures in Thailand’, TDRI Quarterly Review 13(1): 3-11.26 Ministry of Interior
  9. (1999). Economic Indicators’,
  10. (1999). Economics, Politics and (International) Political Economy: The Need for a Balanced Diet in an Era of Globalisation’, doi
  11. (1998). Editorial Introduction. Globalization: Definitions, Debates and Implications’, doi
  12. (1997). External Finance in Thailand’s Development. An Interpretation of Thailand’s Growth doi
  13. (1998). Financial Warfare” Triggers Global Economic Crisis’, Third World Network,
  14. (1997). Foundation
  15. (1998). Globalisation and Sites of Conflict: Towards Definition and Taxonomy’, Warwick Univerity, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Working Paper No.
  16. (1999). Globalisation Not Suitable for All’,
  17. (1995). Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism’, doi
  18. (1997). Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State’, New Left Review No.
  19. (1991). Grass-Roots Development in Rural Development: A Lost Cause?’ World Development doi
  20. (1998). IMF Policies in Asia Come Under Fire’, Third World Network, Kitahara, Atsushi
  21. (1996). Impacts of Trade Liberalisation on Thailand’,
  22. (1999). Justice Unbound? doi
  23. (1997). Lathi boriphok niyom kap sangkhom [Consumerism and Society],
  24. (1997). Meiksins doi
  25. (1993). Nongovernmental Organizations and the Cultural Development Perspective: A Comment on Rigg doi
  26. (1997). Old Soldiers Never Die, They Are Just Bypassed: The Military, Bureaucracy and Globalisation’,
  27. (1998). Phraratchadamrat yutlak setthakit baep pho phieng’ [Royal Speech on the Self-Sufficient Economy],
  28. (1998). Setthakit chumchon cherng rabop: lakkan lae naewkan pattibat’ [The community economy system: Principles and practices],
  29. (1998). Setthakit chumchon phung don eng chabap mahatthai: prathet yak chon prachachon mangkhang’ [The self-reliant economy – Ministry of Interior document: poor country, rich population],
  30. (1998). Setthakit chumchon phung don eng: pratchya thana lae anakhot’ [The self-reliant economy: philosophy, status and future],
  31. (1998). Shea and Li Kheng Po doi
  32. (1998). Thai People Feel the Squeeze’,
  33. (1999). Thailand’s Capitalism: The Impact of the Economic Crisis’,
  34. (1991). The “Community Culture” School of Thought’ in Manas Chitkasem and Andrew Turton (eds) Thai Constructions of Knowledge,
  35. (1998). The Asian Economic Crisis: A Study in the Politics of Resentment’, doi
  36. (1990). The Borderless World : doi
  37. (1997). The Countryside Will Save the Day’,
  38. (1997). The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in the Era of Globalization’, doi
  39. (1997). The Global Economy – Myths and Realities’, doi
  40. (1999). The Limits of Global Liberalisation: Lessons from Asia and Latin America’, Warwick Univerity, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation, Working Paper No. doi
  41. (1998). The roots of the Thai crisis: A failure of development’,
  42. (1998). Why Did Things Go So Wrong?’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.