Location of Repository

The US and ASEM: why the hegemon didn't bark

By Davis B. Bobrow


Relationships with the United States and American policy preferences have been important to the Asian and European members of ASEM in its establishment and activities. Yet US policy, business, and media elites have paid little public attention to ASEM. The puzzle is why not. Explanations of inattentiveness or foresight about Asia’s economic difficulties are unpersuasive. Instead, American ‘silence’ fits with a reasoned understanding among internationally oriented policy and business leaders that ASEM has and will pose little in the way of difficulties for their preferences about Asia and the EU for security, civil society, and economic matters. Indeed, the maneuverings in and around ASEM about those three policy areas have been and are likely to continue to be of some modest help to American internationalists. Their domestic persuasiveness benefits from ASEM developments which bolster actions they desire, and reduce pressure for policy positions they wish to avoid or believe are unlikely to gain approval in the American political economy

Topics: HC, JZ
Publisher: University of Warwick. Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation
Year: 1998
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2108

Suggested articles



  1. (1997a) “Japan to Support Russian Participation
  2. (1997b). “Indonesia Set for Asia-Europe Meeting in
  3. (1998b).“ASEM: Hopes April Meeting Will Accelerate Slow Process: ‘Concrete Steps for Cooperation Needed.” Jan.17.
  4. (1996). A Whole New Game: Asia-European Meeting Seems to Recast Relations.” Far Eastern Economic Review ,
  5. (1996). After Pledges at Asia Summit,
  6. (1997). and Akihiko Tanaka
  7. (1991). and the EC: The Impact of
  8. (1996). ASEM a Success Despite the U.S.” The Daily Yomiuri,
  9. (1996). ASEM is Unlikely to Reach Intellectual Property Pact.” Asian Wall
  10. (1998). ASEM Must Deal with Human Rights Head On.” Nation,
  11. (1998). ASEM: Regional Watchdog Proposed: Plan Originates from Thailand’s Initiative.”
  12. (1997). Asia-Europe Meet Snagged on Trade: Officials Work to Solve LastMinute
  13. (1998). Asia-Europe Meeting II: When Form is Substance.”
  14. (1997). Asia-Europe Meeting: Young ASEM Looks at Downturn.”
  15. (1996). Asia-Europe Summit Gets Down to Business:
  16. (1998). Asia, Europe Must Create Collective Package: Thai PM.”
  17. (1996). Asian and European Nations Pledge Partnership.” March 3, sec.1, p.3. Nikkei/Dow Jones Japan Report
  18. (1997). Asian, European Economic Ministers Call for Closer Ties.”
  19. (1998). Asians Forge New Ties with Europe to Help Battle Crisis.” South China Morning Post,
  20. (1997). Background Note, The ASEM Process: Overview, Follow Up Activities, and Upcoming Events. Directorates-General I and IB,
  21. (1996). Bangkok Summit Redefines, Links Old Disputes Yield to Calls for Progress.” International Herald Tribune,
  22. (1996). Bank Economic and Financial Outlook doi
  23. (1996). China: Int’l Rails to Boost Eurasian Economy.”
  24. (1998). Chuan Backs Asia-Europe Fund.” Nation,
  25. (1996). Close Encounter of a Third Kind?’ the Inaugural Asia-Europe Meeting of March, doi
  26. (1997). Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation (CAEC)
  27. (1996). Do Rights or Economic Growth Come First? Asia and Europe Clash.”
  28. (1984). EC-Japan: Past, Present, and Future.”
  29. Eric (1998a). “Administration Details Defense of Contracts on Satellite Exports.”
  30. Eric (1998b). “Helms Says Clinton Tried to Protect China by Waiving Curbs on Satellite Exports.”
  31. (1997). EU and Asian Ministers Agree to Reduce Barriers.” Financial Times,
  32. (1998). EU-Korean Trade and Trade Diplomacy.” Korea’s Economy
  33. (1998). Europe Must Match Words with Deeds.” Nation.
  34. (1996). Europe: Partner of Asia, European Community Instruments for Economic Cooperation.
  35. (1998). Europe’s Aid Pledge Paves Way for Stronger
  36. (1996). Europe’s Leaders Hone Role as Export Salesmen.” Christian Science Monitor,
  37. European Commission (1996a). EU-ASEAN Relations: A Growing Partnership.
  38. (1998). European Leaders Eager to Dispel Asian Resentment.” Financial Times,
  39. (1997). External Trade Research Organization (JETRO). http://www.jetro.go.jp/ Jung, Ku Hyun and Jean-Pierre Lehmann
  40. (1996). Fair Play? It/s a Trilateral World.” International Herald Tribune,
  41. (1998). For Chinese,
  42. (1996). Foundation Laid for Closer Asian,
  43. (1997). Human Rights: Ministers Urged to Tackle Critical Issues: S’Pore Meeting Put Under Pressure.”
  44. (1996). Implications of the Asia-Europe Meeting for the World Trading System: An Issue-Oriented Review.”
  45. (1997). Information Network doi
  46. (1996). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.35 Wallen, David and Glenn Schloss
  47. (1997). Interview: ASEM Gives Asean Clout: But Not Along the Lines of APEC.”
  48. (1996). Investing in Asia’s Dynamism: European Union Direct Investment in Asia. Luxembourg: European Commission,
  49. (1997). Invisible Barriers: Asians Say Politics is Behind EU Anti-Dumping Action.”
  50. (1997). It’s Our Party: Asia, Europe Spar Over Which Asians Can Join Dialogues.” Far Eastern Economic Review,
  51. (1997). Japan and China Refuse to Take Lead in Asia Crisis." International Herald Tribune,
  52. (1997). Japan Ready to Aid Russia’s Bid to Gain
  53. (1997). Japan Seeks Expert Group to Monitor Plan:
  54. (1996). Leaders at ASEM Agree to a Railway Linking Singapore with Korea.”
  55. (1998). Leaders Call for Unity at Asia-Europe Summit.”
  56. (1996). Let’s Start Again: European Union Moves to Revamp Ties with ASEAN.” Far Eastern Economic Review,
  57. (1998). Meeting of Asian and European (ASEM) Finance Deputies
  58. (1997). Meeting Yes to IMF Link for Asian Fund.” Business Times,
  59. (1996). Morning Post doi
  60. (1998). Mr. Chuan Goes to
  61. (1998). Must Not Lecture Over Rights.”Jakarta Post,
  62. (1996). Newswire
  63. Newswire (1996a). “China Hopes to Further Economic Cooperation with EU.”
  64. Newswire (1996b) “Chinese Premier Calls for SinoFrench Partnership.”
  65. (1997). Outline of ASEM: A Regional Forum as a Jealousy Driven Mechanism.”
  66. (1995). Preparations Start for 1 st Asia –Europe Leaders’ Meeting.” Kyodo News International.
  67. (1998). Reports Show Chinese Military Used American-made Satellites.”
  68. Rethinking a Satellite Deal over Links to Chinese Military.”
  69. (1998). Senior Officials Meeting on Trade and Investment
  70. Shada (1996a). “Lisbon Plays Spoiler’s Role on
  71. Shada (1996b). “Roman Holiday: Italy Promotes Asian trade with Soft Political Line.” Far Eastern Economic Review,
  72. Shada (1996d). “Partners in Profit: EU Seeks to Forge Strong Ties with Asia at Summit.” Far Eastern Economic Review,
  73. (1996). Smooth Sailing at Asem Talks in Bangkok.” Business Times,
  74. (1998). Solidarity Abounds at Asia-Europe Summit.” International Herald Tribune, April 4, 9.31 James,
  75. (1996). Successful Ending to Asia-Europe
  76. Takashi (1991).”Japan and the EC: Wary Partners.”
  77. (1998). Thai Air Force Hopes to Recoup F-18 Fighter Cash.”
  78. (1997). Thailand Proposes Action Plan to Boost Asia-Europe.”
  79. The Economist (1996a). “Asia and Europe: Friends Apart.”
  80. The Economist (1996b). “Has Europe Failed in Asia?”
  81. The Economist (1998b). “Asia and Europe:
  82. The Economist (1998c). “East Asia’s New Faultlines: The Economic Crisis is Putting the Region’s Security at Risk.”
  83. (1996). The First Summit Between the European Union and Countries of East Asia Offers More than Just a Chance for a Reassessment of Trade Between the Two Regions.” South China Morning Post,
  84. (1998). The Future of the World and Asia-Europe Cooperation.”
  85. (1997). The Political and Economic Security Dimension.” CAEC, op.cit.34 Sohn, Tae-Soo
  86. (1997). The Rationale and Common Agenda for Asia-Europe Cooperation: Overview.” CAEC,
  87. (1998). Time to Look West: ASEM Will Only be Taken Seriously on the World Stage if Asian Economic Start to Play by Western Rules.” Financial Times,
  88. Times (1996b). “Thailand Asked to Draft Asia-Europe Investment Plan: ASEM ‘Created Almost Equal Partnership.”
  89. Times (1996c). “Study Investment Prospects, ASEM Told: ASEM Moves to Boost Ties.”
  90. (1996). Ting
  91. (1994). Towards A New Asia Strategy. Communication from the Commission to the Council.
  92. (1997). Trade doi
  93. (1996). Trans-Asian Railway Project: France Keen to Len a Hand.” Business Times,
  94. (1997). with Ernesto Stein and Shang-Jin Wei doi
  95. (1996). World Investment Report doi
  96. (1998). Zhu Rongji Leaves for Visit to Britain..” April 1. Cho, Yong-sang and Chong-tae Chung

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.