Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Trade justice and individual consumption choices : Adam Smith's spectator theory and the moral constitution of the Fair Trade consumer

By Matthew Watson

Abstract

A consistent theme of the existing literature is that fair trade consumption practices represent acts of justice. In this article I investigate such an equation from the perspective of the moral theory of Adam Smith. Smith explains the development of moral sensibilities via an imaginative act he calls `sympathy'. For Smith, justice prevails in interpersonal relationships in which the potential for one person to do harm to another is ruled out because their respective imaginations are in perfect accord, thus creating a situation of mutual sympathy. I advance two main conclusions. First, I argue that fair trade consumption is undoubtedly a moral act in the manner described by Smith, as it involves consumers responding to fair trade campaigns in order to trigger their moral sensibilities through exercising their imaginative faculties. Second, though, I argue that fair trade consumption is not specifically a moral act of justice in the manner described by Smith. The structure of fair trade invites the First World consumer to display sympathy for the Third World producer, but it provides no means for that sympathy to be reciprocated. As such, instances of genuine mutual sympathy do not arise. From a Smithian perspective, fair trade consumption practices are an act of beneficence rather than an act of justice. They thereby reside in the realm of private virtue rather than the realm of public duty, with significant implications for the way in which trade justice is conceptualized and studied in IPE

Topics: HF
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2131

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1979). The Division of Labor in the Economy, the Polity, and Society’,
  2. (2004). Smith Under Strain’, doi
  3. (1999). Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics, translated by Graham Burchell. Cambridge: doi
  4. (1974). Adam Smith’s System: Sympathy not Self-Interest’, doi
  5. (2004). Reason and Sentiments: Review of Emma Rothschild’s Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment’, doi
  6. (2004). Consuming Narratives: The Political Ecology of ‘Alternative’ doi
  7. (2004). On Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion. doi
  8. (1995). Adam Smith’s System of Liberty, Wealth, and Virtue: The Moral and Political Foundations of The Wealth of Nations. doi
  9. (2002). The Age of the Economist, ninth edition. London:
  10. (2004). Reading Fair Trade: Political Ecological Imaginary and the Moral Economy of Fair Trade Foods’, doi
  11. (1999). Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: doi
  12. (1981). The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith. Cambridge: doi
  13. (1990). Between Space and Time: Reflections on the Geographical Imagination’, doi
  14. (1987). Classical Economics. doi
  15. (2003). Removing the Veil? Commodity Fetishism, Fair Trade, and the Environment’, doi
  16. (2000). Retailers, Knowledges and Changing Commodity Networks: The Case of the Cut Flower Trade’, doi
  17. (1988). [1740]) A Treatise of Human Nature, second edition with text revised and notes by P.H. Nidditch. doi
  18. (1998). Is Justice the Primary Feature of the State? Adam Smith’s Critique of Social Contract Theory’,
  19. (1995). The Partial Spectator in the Wealth of Nations: A Robust Utilitarianism’, doi
  20. (1984). Adam Smith and the Theatricality of Moral Sentiments’, doi
  21. (1987). The Mysterious Veil of Self-Delusion” in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments’, doi
  22. (2004). Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of Some Central Components of his Thought. doi
  23. (1989). [1928]) ‘Adam Smith: Moralist and Philosopher’, in John Maurice Clark et al Adam Smith, 1776-1926:
  24. (1991). Getting Beyond the ‘Common Sense’ of the IPE Orthodoxy’,
  25. (1986). Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem’, doi
  26. (1999). Adam Smith and Economic Science: A Methodological Reinterpretation. doi
  27. (2002). Consumer/Producer Links in Fair Trade Coffee Networks’, doi
  28. (2003). Fair Trade: Quality, Markets and Conventions’, doi
  29. Abu Turab (2002) ‘Adam Smith’s Sympathy: Towards a Normative Economics’, doi
  30. (2003). (De)Commodification, Consumer Culture, and Moral Economy’, Environment and Planning D: doi
  31. (2002). An Assessment of Ethical Obligation and Self-Identity in Ethical Consumer Decision-Making: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach’, doi
  32. (1979). A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith. doi
  33. (1981). [1776]) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Volume One, The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, doi
  34. (1982). [1759]) The Theory of Moral Sentiments, The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, edited by D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie from the seventh edition of the original. doi
  35. (1998). How Far Should we Care? On the Spatial Scope of Beneficence’, doi
  36. (1997). Adam Smith’s Conception of the Social Relations of Production’, doi
  37. (2000). Adam Smith’s Growing Concern on the Issue of Distributive Justice’, doi
  38. (2006). Towards a Polanyian Perspective on Fair Trade: MarketBound Economic Agents and the Act of Ethical Consumption’, doi
  39. (1976). Adam Smith: The Man and His Works. doi
  40. (2006). Sympathy, Difference, and Education: Social Unity in the Work of Adam Smith’, doi
  41. (1997). Nourishing Networks: Alternative Geographies of Food’, in David Goodman and Michael Watts (eds) Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.