Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Beyond prospective accountancy : reassessing the case for British membership of the single European currency comparatively

By Colin Hay, Nicola Jo-Anne Smith and Matthew Watson


The fact that Britain will, at most, be a late signatory to the single European currency means that the strategic deliberations it faces in deciding whether to enter EMU are rather different to those of earlier entrants. However, this crucial point is lost in almost all discussion of the subject. To date, the academic debate has been dominated by what we term 'prospective accountancy', in which a series of abstract counterfactuals ostensibly inform a stylised cost–benefit analysis. This article moves beyond such an approach by combining conjectures about the specificities of the British case with a concrete analysis of the experiences of the Eurozone member whose economy appears most closely to resemble Britain's: namely, Ireland. The comparative dimension of our work facilitates more empirically-based analysis of the merits and demerits of British entry into EMU. Yet, it is important not to lose sight of the limits of an exclusively comparative approach, for the British growth model is qualitatively different to that of other European Union economies. British growth since the early 1990s has been consumption led, and this in turn has been fuelled to a considerable degree by the release of equity from the housing market. The likely impact of EMU on the British economy will be determined to a significant extent, then, by its effect upon this key catalyst of British growth. Sadly, no retrospective comparison can inform such an assessment

Topics: HG
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). Common Origins, Different Paths: Adaptation and Change doi
  2. (1996). Economic Implications for Ireland of EMU (Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute).
  3. (2003). Economic Review and Outlook (Dublin: The Stationary Office).
  4. (2001). Economic Surveys: doi
  5. (2000). EMU - The Implications for Ireland (Dublin: Irish Business and Employers’ Confederation).
  6. (2004). End of Year Statement
  7. (2000). European integration and peripherality: lessons from the Irish experience’, doi
  8. (2004). Euros and Europeans: Monetary Integration and the European Model of Society (Cambridge: doi
  9. (1999). External Trade (Cork: Central Statistical Office).
  10. (2001). Fiscal policy in EMU’ in E. Pentecost and A. van Poeck (eds), European Monetary Integration (Aldershot: Edward Elgar). doi
  11. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment doi
  12. (1999). Ireland’s Transition to the Euro (Dublin: Irish Business and Employers’ Confederation).
  13. (2003). Macroeconomic Policy Coordination and Membership of the Single European Currency: doi
  14. (1990). Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics doi
  15. (1988). Macroeconomic Theory and Stabilisation Policy (London: Philip Allan). doi
  16. (1998). Mixed signals: Central Bank independence, coordinated wage bargaining and European Monetary Union, doi
  17. (2000). Political Economy in Macroeconomics doi
  18. (2005). Showcasing Globalisation? The Political Economy of the Irish Republic (Manchester:
  19. (2000). The Irish economy in comparative perspective'
  20. (2003). The Politics of Inflation Management’, doi
  21. (2004). The UK Financial System, fourth edition (Manchester:
  22. (2005). UK Housing Review 2004/2005 (London: Council of Mortgage Lenders).
  23. (2004). WID Country Profile:
  24. (2003). World Investment Report doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.