Location of Repository

International capital mobility in an era of globalisation: adding a political dimension to the 'Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle'

By Matthew Watson

Abstract

The debate about the scope of feasible policy-making in an era of globalisation continues to be set within the context of an assumption that national capital markets are now perfectly integrated at the international level. However, the empirical evidence on international capital mobility contradicts such an assumption. As a consequence, a significant puzzle remains. Why is it, in a world in which the observed pattern of capital flows is indicative of a far from globalised reality, that public policy continues to be constructed in line with more extreme variants of the globalisation hypothesis? I attempt to solve this puzzle by arguing that ideas about global capital market integration have an independent causal impact on political outcomes which extends beyond that which can be attributed to the extent of their actual integration

Topics: HG, HB
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Year: 2001
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2143

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1996). 2 The development of the literature which takes such a view is surveyed
  2. (1983). 3 Such an assumption is made, for example, in Levitt
  3. (1991). Crisis and Choice doi
  4. (2000). Demystifying Globalization, doi
  5. (1980). Domestic Saving and doi
  6. (1988). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, doi
  7. (1990). Economics as Discourse: An Analysis of the Language of Economists, doi
  8. (1997). Electronic Cash and the doi
  9. (1993). Explaining Saving-Investment Correlations’,
  10. (1997). Financial Integration and Real Activity, doi
  11. (1994). From Bretton Woods to Global Finance: A World Turned Upside Down’, doi
  12. (1998). Funding the Welfare State: Globalization and the Taxation of doi
  13. (1994). Global Dreams: Imperial Corporations and the New World Order, doi
  14. (1992). Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography, doi
  15. (1995). Global Versus Country-Specific Productivity Shocks and the Current Account’, doi
  16. (1999). Globalization in Question, 2nd edition,
  17. (1996). Globalization: Critical Reflections, doi
  18. (1996). Globalization: Theory and Practice, doi
  19. (1995). International Capital Mobility in the 1990s’, doi
  20. (1987). International Capital Mobility: What do Saving-Investment Correlations Tell Us?’, doi
  21. (1995). Is It Global Economics or
  22. (1994). Knowledge, Politics, and Neo-Liberal Political Economy’,
  23. (1992). Measuring International Capital Mobility: A Review’, doi
  24. (1991). National Saving and International Investment’, doi
  25. (1991). Quantifying International Capital Mobility in the 1980s’, doi
  26. (1999). Rethinking Capital Mobility, Re-Regulating Financial Markets’, doi
  27. (1998). Savings-Investment Correlations: Transitory Versus Permanent’, The Manchester School Supplement, doi
  28. (1991). Social Institutions and Economic Performance, doi
  29. (1994). space precludes me from reviewing formally the link between ideology and political ideas; on which point, see Gill
  30. (1988). The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric, Cambridge: doi
  31. (1983). The Globalization of Markets’, doi
  32. (1998). The Market: Ethics, Knowledge and Politics, doi
  33. (2000). The New Regulatory Framework’, 4 th Maxwell Fry Global Finance Lecture,
  34. (2000). The Political Economy of Knowledge-Based Growth in Europe: Strategic Visions and Structural Constraints’, Paper presented to the ‘New Economy Workshop’, Senate House,
  35. (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations, doi
  36. (1992). The Work of Nations, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.