Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Health-state utilities in a prisoner population : a cross-sectional survey

By Christopher A. K. Y. Chong, Sicong Li, Geoffrey C. Nguyen, A. J. Sutton, M. H. (Michael H.) Levy, Tony Butler, Murray Krahn and Hla-Hla Thein


Background: Health-state utilities for prisoners have not been described.\ud Methods: We used data from a 1996 cross-sectional survey of Australian prisoners (n = 734).\ud Respondent-level SF-36 data was transformed into utility scores by both the SF-6D and Nichol's\ud method. Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of SF-6D utility were assessed in univariate\ud analyses and a multivariate general linear model.\ud Results: The overall mean SF-6D utility was 0.725 (SD 0.119). When subdivided by various medical\ud conditions, prisoner SF-6D utilities ranged from 0.620 for angina to 0.764 for those with none/mild\ud depressive symptoms. Utilities derived by the Nichol's method were higher than SF-6D scores,\ud often by more than 0.1. In multivariate analysis, significant independent predictors of worse utility\ud included female gender, increasing age, increasing number of comorbidities and more severe\ud depressive symptoms.\ud Conclusion: The utilities presented may prove useful for future economic and decision models\ud evaluating prison-based health programs

Topics: HV, RA
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population. Health Econ doi
  2. (2005). Assessing the health of women in prison: A study from the United Kingdom. Health Care Women Int doi
  3. Biostatistical Analysis Upper Saddle River:
  4. (2004). Eng K: Comparing utility scores derived from the Short-Form 36, standard gamble and Health Utilities Index. Institute of Health Economics Working Paper 04-05; doi
  5. (2004). Estimation and comparison of derived preference scores from the SF-36 in lung transplant patients. Quality of Life Research doi
  6. (1979). G: Cognitive Therapy of Depression NewYork:
  7. (2006). GJ: The effect of hepatitis C virus infection on healthrelated quality of life in prisoners. J Urban Health doi
  8. (2004). HK: Cost-effectiveness analysis of telemedicine to evaluate diabetic retinopathy in a prisoner population. Diab Care doi
  9. (2001). MG: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for Use in Primary Care 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization;
  10. (1996). Multi-Attribute Preference Functions for A Comprehensive Health Status Classification System: Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care doi
  11. (2008). ON: The cost-effectiveness of screening and treatment for hepatitis C in prisons in England and Wales: a cost-utility analysis. J Viral Hepat doi
  12. (2002). Perceived quality of life and mental health status of Irish female prisoners. Ir Med J
  13. (1997). Preliminary findings of the NSW Inmate Health Survey NSW: NSW Corrections Health Service; doi
  14. (2006). Prisons: mental health institutions of the 21st century? MJA
  15. (2008). Shabunthom R: A comparison of EQ-5D index scores using the UK, US and Japan preference weights in a Thai sample with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes doi
  16. (1992). Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care doi
  17. (2005). Shiffman ML: The spectrum of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in the Virginia correctional system: development of a strategy for the evaluation and treatment of inmates with HCV. doi
  18. (2001). The cost-effectiveness of celecoxib and rofecoxib in patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Ottawa: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment; doi
  19. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ doi
  20. (1999). The impact of diagnosis of hepatitis C virus on quality of life. Hepatology doi
  21. (2007). US Norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement Study. Med Care doi
  22. (2008). Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population. Value Health doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.