Location of Repository

Group treatments for sensitive health care problems : a randomised controlled trial of group versus individual physiotherapy sessions for female urinary incontinence

By S. E. (Sallie E.) Lamb, Jo Pepper, Ranjit Lall, Ellen C. Jørstad-Stein, M. D. (Michael D.) Clark, Lesley Hill and Jan Fereday Smith

Abstract

Background: The aim was to compare effectiveness of group versus individual sessions of physiotherapy in terms of symptoms, quality of life, and costs, and to investigate the effect of patient preference on uptake and outcome of treatment. \ud Methods: A pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trial in five British National Health Service physiotherapy departments. 174 women with stress and/or urge incontinence were randomised to receive treatment from a physiotherapist delivered in a group or individual setting over three weekly sessions. Outcome were measured as Symptom Severity Index; Incontinence-related Quality of Life questionnaire; National Health Service costs, and out of pocket expenses. \ud Results: The majority of women expressed no preference (55%) or preference for individual treatment (36%). Treatment attendance was good, with similar attendance with both service delivery models. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in symptom severity or quality of life outcomes between the models. Over 85% of women reported a subjective benefit of treatment, with a slightly higher rating in the individual compared with the group setting. When all health care costs were considered, average cost per patient was lower for group sessions (Mean cost difference £52.91 95%, confidence interval (£25.82 - £80.00)). \ud Conclusion: Indications are that whilst some women may have an initial preference for individual treatment, there are no substantial differences in the symptom, quality of life outcomes or non-attendance. Because of the significant difference in mean cost, group treatment is recommended

Topics: RM
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2177

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1986). A woman's lot? Nursing Times
  2. (1999). AM: Calculating the direct costs of urinary incontinence: a new test instrument. doi
  3. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariata Data London:
  4. Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults. [see comment] [update of Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi
  5. (1996). C: Development of a symptom severity index and a symptom impact index for stress incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn doi
  6. Curtin L: Unit cost of Health and Social Care. Personal Social Services Research Unit,
  7. (1991). EC: Efficacy of bladder training in older women with urinary incontinence. JAMA
  8. (1995). Fantl JA: Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: doi
  9. (2001). Felling AJ: The effects of physiotherapy for female urinary incontinence: individual compared with group treatment. doi
  10. (2001). Group treatment of female urinary incontinence: literature review. Physiotherapy doi
  11. (2000). Hunskaar S: A communitybased epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence. The Norwegian EPINCONT study. doi
  12. (2001). JY: The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. doi
  13. (2002). LK: Behavioral training with and without biofeedback in the treatment of urge incontinence in older women: a randomized controlled trial. [see comment]. JAMA doi
  14. (2003). LK: Effect of behavioral training with or without pelvic floor electrical stimulation on stress incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial. [see comment]. JAMA doi
  15. (2006). Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews doi
  16. (1997). Pinol A: Sample size tables for clinical studies. Oxford edition 2nd edition. doi
  17. (2005). Self-reports of health-care utilization: diary or questionnaire? doi
  18. (1999). Single blind, randomised controlled trial of pelvic floor exercises, electrical stimulation, vaginal cones, and no treatment in management of genuine stress incontinence in women. BMJ doi
  19. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing data doi
  20. (2004). Straus SE: Management of urinary incontinence in women: clinical applications. JAMA doi
  21. (1993). The meaning of incontinence: a qualitative study of non-geriatric urinary incontinence sufferers. doi
  22. (2000). van Kerrebroeck PE: Conservative treatment of urge urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.