Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Thermodynamic pathways to genome spatial organization in the cell nucleus\ud

By Mario Nicodemi and Antonella Prisco

Abstract

The architecture of the eukaryotic genome is characterized by a high degree of spatial organization. Chromosomes occupy preferred territories correlated to their state of activity and, yet, displace their genes to interact with remote sites in complex patterns requiring the orchestration of a huge number of DNA loci and molecular regulators. Far from random, this organization serves crucial functional purposes, but its governing principles remain elusive. By computer simulations of a Statistical Mechanics model, we show how architectural patterns spontaneously arise from the physical interaction between soluble binding molecules and chromosomes via collective thermodynamics mechanisms. Chromosomes colocalize, loops and territories form and find their relative positions as stable hermodynamic states. These are selected by “thermodynamic switches” which are regulated by concentrations/affinity of soluble mediators and by number/location of their attachment sites along chromosomes. Our “thermodynamic switch model” of nuclear architecture, thus, explains on quantitative grounds how well known cell strategies of upregulation of DNA binding proteins or modification of chromatin structure can dynamically shape the organization of the nucleus

Topics: QH426
Publisher: Biophysical Society
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2190

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. doi
  2. (2004). A role for macromolecular crowding effects in the assembly and function of compartments in the nucleus. doi
  3. (2007). A Symmetry Breaking Model for X Chromosome Inactivation. doi
  4. (2007). A system approach to measuring binding energy landscape of transcription factors. doi
  5. (2008). A thermodynamic switch for chromosome colocalization. doi
  6. (2004). Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. doi
  7. (2008). Allele-specific nuclear positioning of the monoallelically expressed astrocyte marker GFAP. Genes Dev. doi
  8. (2007). An evaluation of 3C-based methods to capture DNA interactions. doi
  9. (1997). Applications of Monte Carlo methods to statistical physics. doi
  10. (1997). Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. doi
  11. (2007). Beyond the Sequence: Cellular Organization of Genome Function. doi
  12. (2005). Cajal bodies, nucleoli, and speckles in the Xenopus oocyte nucleus have a low-density, sponge-like structure. doi
  13. (2008). ChIPping away at gene regulation. EMBO Rep. Review 9:337–43. doi
  14. (1998). Chromosome structure predicted by a polymer model. doi
  15. (2006). Chromosome territories -a functional nuclear landscape. doi
  16. (2007). Chromosome territories. doi
  17. (2006). Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nature Genet. 38:1341–1347.Thermodynamic pathways to genome organization 11 doi
  18. (2008). Colocalization transition of homologous chromosomes at meiosis. doi
  19. Compartmentalization of Interphase Chromosomes Observed in Simulation and Experiment. doi
  20. (2006). CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to doi
  21. (2008). domainmediated dimerization and homeodomain-directed specificity are required for high-affinity DNA binding by SATB1. doi
  22. (1988). Dosage-dependent modifiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect.
  23. (2007). Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. doi
  24. (2008). Dynamics of gene expression and the regulatory inference problem. doi
  25. (2006). Entropy-driven genome organization. doi
  26. (1995). Evidence for the Organization of Chromatin in Megabase Pair-sized Loops Arranged along a Random Walk Path in the Human G0/G1 Interphase Nucleus. doi
  27. (2007). Evidence that homologous X-chromosome pairing requires transcription of Ctcf protein. doi
  28. (2008). Exchange of GATA Factors Mediates Transitions in Looped Chromatin Organization at a Developmentally Regulated Gene Locus. doi
  29. (2007). From biophysics to evolutionary genetics: Statistical aspects of gene regulation. doi
  30. (2008). Genome-wide mapping of allele-specific protein-DNA interactions in human cells. doi
  31. (2006). Heterochromatin protein 1: don’t judge the book by its cover! Curr Opin Genet Dev. doi
  32. (2007). Identification of a Ctcf cofactor, Yy1, for the X chromosome binary Switch. doi
  33. (2006). Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice. doi
  34. (2006). Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. doi
  35. (1971). Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena. doi
  36. (2006). Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. doi
  37. (2007). Long-range DNA contacts: romance in the nucleus? doi
  38. (2005). Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. doi
  39. (2006). Modeling a Self-Avoiding Chromatin Loop: Relation to the Packing Problem, Action-at-a-Distance, and Nuclear Context. Structure 14:197. doi
  40. (2002). Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics. doi
  41. (2007). Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. doi
  42. (2004). Nucleosome interactions in chromatin: fiber stiffening and hairpin formation. doi
  43. (2007). Packing of the polynucleosome chain in interphase chromosomes: evidence for a contribution of crowding and entropic forces. doi
  44. (2002). Physical constraints and functional characteristics of transcription factor-DNA interaction. doi
  45. (1993). Polymer models for interphase chromosomes. doi
  46. (2002). Predicting three-dimensional genome structure from transcriptional activity. doi
  47. (2001). Protein Dynamics: Implications for Nuclear Architecture and Gene Expression. doi
  48. (2005). Protein-DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models. Nucleic Acids Res. doi
  49. (2005). Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the beta-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. doi
  50. (2004). Radial Arrangement of Chromosome Territories in Human Cell Nuclei: A Computer Model Approach Based on Gene Density Indicates a Probabilistic Global Positioning Code. doi
  51. (2007). Random loop model for long polymers. doi
  52. (2005). Replication and transcription: shaping the landscape of the genome. doi
  53. (2007). Self-assembly and DNA binding of the blocking factor doi
  54. (2003). Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub.
  55. (2004). The active spatial organization of the beta-globin locus requires the transcription factor EKLF. Genes Dev. doi
  56. (2008). The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family: put away a bias toward HP1. Mol Cells 26:217–27.
  57. (2007). The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. doi
  58. (1984). The Theory of Polymer Dynamics.
  59. (2007). The third dimension of gene regulation: organization of dynamic chromatin loopscape by SATB1. doi
  60. (2007). What are the molecular ties that maintain genomic loops? Trends Genet. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.