Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The effect of interstimulus interval on sequential effects in absolute identification

By William J. Matthews and Neil Stewart


In absolute identification experiments, the participant is asked to identify stimuli drawn from a small set of items which differ on a single physical dimension (e.g., 10 tones which vary in frequency). Responses in these tasks show a striking pattern of sequential dependencies: The current response assimilates towards the immediately preceding stimulus but contrasts with the stimuli further back in the sequence. This pattern has been variously interpreted as resulting from confusion of items in memory, shifts in response criteria, or the action of selective attention, and these interpretations have been incorporated into competing formal models of absolute identification performance. In two experiments, we demonstrate that lengthening the time between trials increases contrast to both the previous stimulus and the stimulus two trials back. This surprising pattern of results is difficult to reconcile with the idea that sequential dependencies result from memory confusion or from criterion shifts, but is consistent with an account that emphasizes selective attention

Topics: BF
Publisher: Psychology Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2005). A ballistic model of choice response time. doi
  2. (1984). A fixed rehearsal capacity interpretation of36 limits on absolute identification performance. doi
  3. (1986). A limited capacity rehearsal model for psychophysical judgments applied to magnitude estimation. doi
  4. (1995). A mapping model of bow effects in absolute identification. doi
  5. (1983). A memory model of sequential effects in scaling tasks. doi
  6. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. doi
  7. (1984). A theory of criterion setting: An alternative to the attention band and response ratio hypotheses in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. doi
  8. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment.Psychological Review, doi
  9. (2007). Absolute identification is relative: A reply to Brown, Marley, and Lacouture doi
  10. (2004). Absolute judgments are relative: A reinterpretation of some psychophysical ideas. doi
  11. (2005). An exemplar account of the bow and set-size effects in absolute identification. doi
  12. (2008). An integrated model of choices and responses times in absolute identification. doi
  13. (1976). Attention bands in absolute identification. doi
  14. (1997). Bow, range, and sequential effects in absolute identification: A response-time analysis. doi
  15. (1998). Effects of stimulus information and number of stimuli on sequential Dependencies in absolute identification. doi
  16. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse. doi
  17. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, doi
  18. (1954). Intertrial association at the visual threshold as a function of intertrial interval. doi
  19. (1992). Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling. doi
  20. (2007). Is absolute identification always relative? doi
  21. (2004). Learning in a unidimensional identification task. doi
  22. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, doi
  23. (1992). Psychophysical scaling: judgments of attributes or objects? doi
  24. (1995). Pure feedback effects in absolute identification. doi
  25. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. doi
  26. (1987). Remembrance of sounds past: Memory and psychophysical scaling. doi
  27. (1971). Response system processed in absolute judgment. doi
  28. (1970). Sequential effects and memory in category judgments. doi
  29. (1968). Sequential effects in absolute judgments of loudness. doi
  30. (1977). Sequential effects in judgments of loudness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, doi
  31. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: models and theory. doi
  32. (1974). Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics. doi
  33. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli.Psychological doi
  34. (2005). The dynamics of scaling: A memory-based37 anchor model of category rating and absolute identification. doi
  35. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for information processing. doi
  36. (1984). The relativity of ‘absolute’ judgments. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.