Location of Repository

Regulation and efficiency incentives: evidence from the England and Wales water and sewerage industry

By Fabrizio Erbetta and Martin Cave

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of the tightening in price cap by OFWAT and of other operational factors on the efficiency of water and sewerage companies in England and Wales using a mixture of data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Previous empirical results suggest that the regulatory system introduced at privatization was lax. The 1999 price review signaled a tightening in regulation which is shown to have led to a significant reduction in technical inefficiency. The new economic environment set by price-cap regulation acted to bring inputs closer to their cost-minimizing levels from both a technical and allocative perspective

Topics: HD
Publisher: Bepress
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2251

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis,”
  2. (1992). Allocative Distortions, Technical Progress, and Input Demand in U.S. doi
  3. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. doi
  4. (2002). Can Public Sector Reforms Improve the doi
  5. (2003). Cost Inefficiency in the English and Welsh Water Industry: An Heteroskedastic Stochastic Cost Frontier Approach,” Economics Discussion Papers 573,
  6. (1999). Cost Structure and the Measurement of Economic Performance, doi
  7. (2000). DEA and Its Use in the Regulation of Water Companies,” doi
  8. (2003). Deregulation, Ownership, and Productivity Growth in the Banking Industry: Evidence from doi
  9. (2007). Determining the Contribution of Technical Change, doi
  10. (2006). Driving Forces for Consolidation or Fragmentation of the US Water Utility Industry: A Cost Function Approach with Endogenous Output,” doi
  11. (1986). Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs,” doi
  12. (2006). Efficiency Analysis for Incentive Regulation,”
  13. (2004). Efficiency and Regulatory Issues in the Brazilian Water and Sewerage Sector: An Empirical Study,” Utilities Policy, doi
  14. (2004). Estimating Opex Productivity Growth
  15. (1981). Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through,” doi
  16. (1992). Frontier Production Function, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in doi
  17. (2001). Identifying Network Density and Scale Economies for Japanese Water Supply Organisations,” Papers in doi
  18. (2007). Incorporating the Operating Environment into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency,”
  19. (2001). Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. doi
  20. (1990). Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking: Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence,” doi
  21. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” doi
  22. (1993). Modelling Water Costs 1992-93: Further Research into the Impact of Operating Conditions on Company Costs,” Research Paper, The Office of Water Services (OFWAT),
  23. (2007). Nationalisation versus Regulation of Monopolies: The Effects of Ownership on
  24. (2006). Performance Measurement in the Australian Water Supply Industry: A Preliminary Analysis,”
  25. (1995). Privatisation and Efficiency in the UK Water Industry: An Empirical Analysis,” doi
  26. (2001). Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatized Water and Sewerage Companies of England and doi
  27. (1983). Public Versus Private Water Delivery: A Hedonic Cost Approach,” The Review of Economics and doi
  28. Raffiee (1995b) “Allocative Efficiency of Rural Nevada Water Systems: A Hedonic Shadow Cost Function Approach,” doi
  29. (2007). Recent Developments in the Theory of Regulation,” doi
  30. (1998). Regression Versus Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficiency Measurement: An Application to the England and Wales Regulated Water Industry,” Utilities Policy, doi
  31. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in doi
  32. (1993). Technical Efficiency in New Jersey School Districts,”
  33. (2002). Technical, Allocative, Cost and Scale Efficiencies in Bangladesh Rice Cultivation: A Non-parametric Approach,” doi
  34. (2004). The Comparative Impact of Privatisation and Regulation on
  35. (2000). The Decomposition of Cost Inefficiency into Technical and Allocative Components with doi
  36. (2000). The Impact of Privatization and Regulation on the Water and Sewerage Industry in England and Wales: A Translog Cost Function Model,” doi
  37. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” doi
  38. (1994). The Office of Water Services (OFWAT)
  39. (2001). The Structure of Municipal Water Supply Costs: Application to a Panel of French Local
  40. (2000). The Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in the Regulation of UK Water Utilities: Water Distribution,” doi
  41. (2000). Total Factor Productivity Growth and Technical Change in the Water and Sewerage Industry,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.