Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A systematic review of population and community dietary interventions to prevent cancer

By Margaret Thorogood, Iveta Simera, Elizabeth Dowler, Carolyn Summerbell and Eric Brunner


Diet is an important factor in the causation of cancer. Previous systematic reviews of one-to-one interventions to encourage dietary change have found that such interventions can achieve modest improvements in diet. However, such interventions are resource intensive and unlikely to be good value for money at a population level. Interventions that address groups, communities or whole populations may be less resource intensive and effect change in a wider population. We report a systematic review of such interventions. We set wide inclusion criteria, including before-and-after studies and studies with a non-randomized comparison group as well as randomized trials. We found eighteen studies based in the community, seventeen based on worksites, five based in churches and one based in a supermarket. Interventions which targeted fruit and vegetable intake were most likely to be successful, particularly in worksites and churches. There was also evidence of small positive effects on reducing fat intake in worksites and churches. Overall the community-based interventions showed little effect. The studies included in the present review were generally poorly reported. Dietary changes are reported in the relatively short-term studies reviewed here but may not be sustained in the long term. The effects that we have identified are small but the reach is potentially very wide, in some cases as wide as a whole country. The cost effectiveness of such strategies remains to be evaluated

Topics: RA0421, RC0254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of cancer. doi
  2. (1996). The health impact of worksite nutrition and cholesterol intervention programs. doi
  3. (1997). Health Promotion Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating in the General Population: a Review.
  4. (1998). Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating in Elderly People Living in the Community: a Review.
  5. (1998). Harden A & Oliver S doi
  6. (1998). Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating in Pregnant Women and Women in Childbearing Age: a review.
  7. (1998). Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Healthy Eating in People from Minority Ethnic Groups: a Review.
  8. (1999). The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. doi
  9. (2000). Effectiveness of community-based interventions to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. doi
  10. (2002). Dietary interventions to prevent disease. doi
  11. (2002). Health promotion trials at worksites and risk factors for cancer. doi
  12. (2005). Dietary interventions for reducing cardiovascular risk. doi
  13. (2005). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4·2·5, section (updated doi
  14. (1996). Preventing cardiovascular disease through community-based risk reduction: the Bootheel Heart Health project. doi
  15. (1994). Community intervention and trends in dietary fat consumption among black and white adults. doi
  16. (1995). Koepsell T,Wagner E,Curry S & Kristal A
  17. (1995). California’s “5 a Day – for Better Health” campaign: an innovative population-based effort to effect large-scale dietary change.
  18. (1995). Take Heart: results from the initial phase of work-site wellness program. doi
  19. (1997). Take Heart II: replication of a worksite health promotion trial.
  20. (1995). Cardiovascular health promotion in north Florida AfricanAmerican churches.
  21. (1996). The effect of a worksite cafeteria program on employees’ dietary fat intakes.
  22. (1999). Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the treatwell 5-a-day study. doi
  23. (1996). Work site-based cancer prevention: primary results from the Working Well Trial. doi
  24. (1997). Evaluation of a supermarket intervention to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables. doi
  25. (1997). Profitability and acceptability of fat- and sodium-modified hot entrees in a worksite cafeteria. doi
  26. (1999). Using mass media to promote healthy eating: a community-based demonstration project. doi
  27. (1998). 1% or less: a community-based nutrition campaign.
  28. (1999). Randomized trial testing the effect of peer education at increasing fruit and vegetable intake. doi
  29. (1999). Fruit and vegetable consumption and prevention of cancer: the Black Churches United for Better Health Project. doi
  30. (2002). Sanhueza A doi
  31. (1999). Can community organization strategies be used to implement smoking and dietary changes in a rural manufacturing work site? doi
  32. (1999). The impact of a community-based heart disease prevention program in a low-income, inner-city neighborhood. doi
  33. (1999). Nutrition intervention for high-risk auto workers: results of the next step trial. doi
  34. (2001). Seattle 5 a Day worksite program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. doi
  35. (2001). Project joy: faith based cardiovascular health promotion for African American women.
  36. (2002). Changes invegetable and fruit consumption and awareness among US adults: results of the 1991 and 1997 5 A Day for Better Health Program surveys. doi
  37. (2004). The PHLAME firefighters’ study: feasibility and findings. doi
  38. (2004). Quebec Heart Health Demonstration Project Research Group doi
  39. (2004). Body and Soul – a dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches. doi
  40. (1994). Results of the Dutch community project ‘Healthy Bergeyk’. doi
  41. (1996). Nutritional epidemiology: methods and innovations used in a central European community-based program. doi
  42. (1997). Results of a community-based campaign to reduce fat intake. doi
  43. (1998). Effects of the Heartbeat Wales programme over five years on behavioural risks for cardiovascular disease: quasi-experimental comparison of result from Wales and a matched reference area. doi
  44. (2003). The Finnmark Intervention Study: is it possible to change CVD risk factors by community-based intervention in an Arctic village in crisis? doi
  45. (2003). Deprivation, diet, and food-retail access: findings from the Leeds ‘food deserts’ study. doi
  46. (2004). Does the Heartbeat Award scheme in Englandresult inchange indietary behaviour in the workplace?
  47. (2004). Successful strategies to increase the consumption of fruits and vegetables: results from the Danish ‘6 a day’ Work-site Canteen Model Study. doi
  48. (2004). The Dutch Heart Health community intervention ‘Hartslag Limburg’: results of an effect study at individual level. doi
  49. (2004). The impact of educational and environmental interventions in Dutch worksite cafeterias. doi
  50. (1999). Evaluation of a communitybased health promotion program supporting public policy initiatives for a healthy diet. doi
  51. (2000). The Australian National Workplace Health Project: design and baseline findings. doi
  52. (2001). Changing risk behaviours for non-communicable disease in New Zealand working men – is workplace intervention effective?
  53. (2004). Baseline data and design for a randomized intervention study of dietary change in religious organizations. doi
  54. (1981). Promoting health through structural change: analysis of the origins and implementation of Norway’s farmfood-nutrition policy. doi
  55. (1991). Household Food Consumption and Expenditure doi
  56. (2001). The CONSORT statement revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. doi
  57. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.