Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Heidegger's reading of Aristotle: praxis and the ontology of movement

By David Andrew Noel Webb

Abstract

Heidegger perceives a naivety at the heart of Greek metaphysics to which he believes philosophy has remained prey throughout its history. This consists in having taken the understanding of being appropriate to the activity and experience of production [ποίησις] as the basis for understanding being in general. What such a interpretation lacks above all is a conception of human being as that which, distinct from the work, engages in productive activity. Only if such a conception were secured in contradistinction to the understanding of being derived from the work could, in Heidegger's view, ontology itself be placed on firm footing. By way of a response, Heidegger undertook a critical appropriation of Aristotle's practical philosophy and of the concept of πραξις in particular. This was to provide the basis of an account of Dasein. However, the outcome of the appropriation was problematic in two respects.\ud First, Aristotle's own presentation of πραξις as the horizonal structure of teleological activity is dogged by incoherencies arising precisely from the influence exerted on the language of metaphysics by the experience of ποίησις. Indeed, the extent of this influence renders the language of metaphysics intrinsically ill-suited to the articulation of πραξις. Heidegger's appropriation of the figure of the end-in-itself must therefore be accompanied by an attempt to wrest it from the dominant conceptual structures of production.\ud Second, insofar as the terms in which Heidegger couches the\ud ontological determination of Dasein are taken from the language of practical philosophy, there arises a formal parallel between the transcendence of Dasein and possible structures of activity. Such a parallel invites the supposition that Dasein's transcendence may be enacted or accomplished in its comportment in and towards the world.\ud Although I shall be concerned primarily with the first of these problems, the second remains a constant consideration and recurs explicitly at several junctures. Drawing on Heidegger's reading of Metaphysics Θ, I argue that he sought to secure an ontological interpretation of χίνησις, δύναμις and ένέργεια from which the influence of production had been displaced. Specifically, this hinges on the idea of finite appropriation as the essence of δύναμις. In addition, Heidegger emphasises the way in which each potentiality is related to the manner of its accomplishment. As an activity that is an end in itself, πραξις, is therefore understood as an activity of finite appropriation whose end is the very movement of appropriation itself. As such, it constitutes a repetition of the essence of δύναμις and of the transcendence of Dasein insofar as it is understood to be constituted by δύναμις

Topics: B1, BD
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2351

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1951). A Greek Lexicon,
  2. (1989). A Response to Robert Bernasconi's "Heidegger's Destruction of Phronesis"' doi
  3. (1990). After Heidegger, doi
  4. (1928). AnfansgrEinde der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz
  5. (1992). apophainesthai als ermeneuein: Die OntolisieruAg der Sprache beim frühen Heidesger im RÜck gr'ff auf Aristoteles, '
  6. (1979). Aporia del discorso etico Aristotelico e la definizione dell'economico, '
  7. (1923). Ar-istoteles: Grundlegung einer Geschichte seiner Entwicklung, doi
  8. (1969). Ari stot I e's Def ini t ion of Mot ion, ' Phronesis Vo I-XIV
  9. (1988). Aristote et ]a question du monde, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, doi
  10. (1987). Aristotele e ]a razionalith della prassi,
  11. (1990). Aristotele e Kant: orizzonti, prospettive e limite del dibatito sulla «riabilitazione» della filosofia pratica», '
  12. (1972). Aristotele eI 'idea della filosofia, doi
  13. (1974). Aristoteles,
  14. (1976). Aristotle and the Megarians on the Potentiality-Actuality Distinction, ' doi
  15. (1980). Aristotle on doi
  16. (1985). Aristotle, London and
  17. (1975). Aristotle's Man: Speculations on Aristotelian Anthropology, doi
  18. (1980). Aristotle's Theory of Causal Action doi
  19. (1983). Aristotle's Theory of Moral Insight, doi
  20. (1990). Comprensione dell'essere e senso
  21. (1991). D6termination aristot61icienne du principe divin comme Ctüý (Met. A. 7.1072b26-30)'
  22. (1988). Dasein comme praxis: L'assimilation et la radicalisation heideggerienne de la philosophie pratique d'Aristote, ' Heidegger et I 'id6e de ]a ph6nomonologie,
  23. De Aristote 6 Heidegger, ' doi
  24. (1986). Delimitations, Bloomington and Indianapolis,
  25. (1989). Destruction of Phronesis, ' doi
  26. (1976). Die Frage nach der Wahrheit (1925/26), doi
  27. (1979). Dynamis, Energeia and the Megarians, ' doi
  28. (1935). EinfUhrung in die Metaphysik doi
  29. (1989). Elucidations of its "Introduction",
  30. (1977). Erkennen und Handeln in Heidegger's ))Sein und Zeite, Munich and Freiburg, Verlag Karl Alber,
  31. (1989). espri t, Hei degger etIa ques ti on, Pa ris Ga Ii 16e, 198 7; t r.
  32. (1935). Frage nach dem Ding. Zu Kants Lehre von den transcendentelen Grundsdtzen doi
  33. (1975). From Platonism to Neo-Platonism, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, doi
  34. (1989). Fynsk, London and Cambridge Massachusetts,
  35. (1983). Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Welt - Endlichkeit - Einsamkeit (1929/30),
  36. (1927). Grundprobleme der Ph-Nnomenologie
  37. (1990). Hei degger etI 'essence de I 'homme, Grenob I e, J6r6me MiII on,
  38. (1960). Heidegger Denker in dÜrftiger Zeit, doi
  39. (1984). Heidegger e Aristotele, doi
  40. (1990). Heidegger lecteur d'Aristote: Dynamis et 6nergeia sous le regard
  41. (1975). Heidegger, Aristotle and Phenomenology, ' doi
  42. (1986). Heidegger, Thought and Historicity, doi
  43. (1988). Heidegger's Pragmatism: Understanding, Being and the Critique of Metaphysics, doi
  44. (1923). Hermeneutik der Faktizitdt
  45. (1989). I 'ontologie fondamentale: Essais sur Heidegger,
  46. (1950). Ideen, The Hague, Martinus Niihoff,
  47. (1985). Inter-pretationen zu Aristoteles. Einfiffirung in die ph9homenologische Forschung (1921/22),
  48. Interpretation of Aristotle: 'Dynamis' and 'Ereignis,
  49. (1922). Interpretationen zu Aristoteles (Anzeige der hermeneutischen Situation)
  50. (1977). Introduction to Aristotle's Theory of Being a Being, trans. R Schine, The Hague, Martinus Niihoff, doi
  51. (1987). Inventions de I'autre,
  52. (1942). Kausalität und Zufall doi
  53. Kinesis und Energeia bei Aristoteles, ' Phronesis, doi
  54. (1992). Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781), Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, doi
  55. (1992). L'esistenza come praxis. Le radici aristoteliche della terminologia di "Essere e Tempo"'
  56. (1959). L'Ethique a Nicomaque: traduction et commentaire Tome 11 premiere partie, Louvain, Publications Universitaires de Louvain, doi
  57. (1986). L'imitation des modernes: Typographies 11,
  58. (1987). La fiction du politique, doi
  59. (1990). La Lettura heideggeriana del la
  60. (1961). la notion aristotelicienne d'aporie, ' Aristote et les probldmes de m6thode, communications pr6sent6es au SYMPOsium Aristotelicum tenu A Louvain du 24 aoOt au I septembre 1960, Louvain and Paris, Publications Universitaires and Matrice-Nauwelaberts,
  61. (1971). Language and Thought, trans. A Hof stadter,
  62. Le concept de I '9tre comme production, ' doi
  63. (1990). Le Langage Heidegger, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, doi
  64. (1962). Le probl6me de I '&tre chez Aristote, Paris: Press Universitaires de France,
  65. (1989). Le ragioni di Aristotele,
  66. (1977). London and Cambridge Massachusetts, Heinemann and
  67. (1972). Marges de ]a philOSOPhie, Paris, Editions de Minuit, doi
  68. (1970). Martin Heidegger und die
  69. (1992). Metaphysics, Fundamental Ontology, Metontology 1925-1935, '
  70. (1981). Movement and the Destruction of Ontology' doi
  71. (1966). Nicomachean Ethics, 1,1096b26-29, ' Phronesis doi
  72. (1980). Notre Compagne Clandestine, ' Textes Pour Emmanuel Levinas,
  73. (1992). On the Concreteness of Heidegger's Thinking' doi
  74. (1975). On the Several Senses of Being doi
  75. P6ggeler, 'Sein als Ereignis, , Zeitschrift fOr Philosophische Forschung 13,1959; tr. 'Being as Appropriation'
  76. (1963). prudence chez Aristote, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France: doi
  77. (1933). Selbstbehauptung der deutschen Universität. Rede, gehalten bei der feierlichen Übernahme des Rektorat
  78. (1992). Sophistes (1924/5),
  79. (1951). The Alicomachean Ethics,
  80. The Collected Papers of -Toseph Owens,
  81. (1951). The Doctrine of Being in Aristotelian Metaphysics, doi
  82. (1989). The Double Concept of Philosophy" and the Place of Ethics
  83. (1929). The Essence of Reasons
  84. (1900). The Ethics of Aristotle, doi
  85. (1976). The Ethics of Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, trans. doi
  86. (1922). The Genesis of Heidegger's Phenomenological Hermeneutics and the Rediscovered "Aristotle Introduction" doi
  87. (1958). The Human Condition, Chicago & London, doi
  88. (1991). The I-Midegger Controversy: a Critical Reader,
  89. (1982). The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. H Rackham, London and Cambridge Massachusetts, Heinemann and
  90. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology, trans. W Lovitt,
  91. (1985). The Question of Language in Heidegger's History of Being, doi
  92. (1989). The Role of the Ergon Argument in Aristotle's Hicomachean Ethics, doi
  93. (1992). The Transformation of Language at Another Beginning, ' Martin Heidegger: Critical Assessments Vol
  94. (1958). TI KATA TINOEF: eine Untersuchung zu Struktur und Ursprung Aristotelischer Grundbegriffe, doi
  95. (1982). tr. Parmenides, trans. A Schuwer and R Rojecwiez, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
  96. (1980). trans. PH Wicksteed &FM Cornford (in two volumes), London and Cambridge Massachusetts, Heinemann and
  97. (1929). und das Problem der Metaphysik doi
  98. Verhaltnis zu Brentanos Aristoteles-Interpretation: die Frage nach dem
  99. (1991). Violence and the Question of Politics in Heidegger's Introduction to Metaphysics, ' doi
  100. (1990). Vivere" e "vivere bene". Note sul concetto aristotelico di npUftiq, ' Revue de ]a metaphysique et du morale,
  101. (1936). Vortriige und Aufsbtze
  102. (1976). Wegmarken (1919-1961),
  103. (1930). Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit. Einleitung in die Philosophie
  104. (1988). Zu Platons H&hengleichnis und Thedtet (1931/32),
  105. (1925). zur Geschichte des Zeitsbegriffs
  106. (1967). Zur Kritik der InstrumentelIen Vernunft, Frankfurt am Main, Verlag GmbH,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.