Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Social inclusion and its promotion

By James Thomas Fitzgibbon

Abstract

This research study is concerned with the concept of social inclusion, its significance, its origins, its definition and its history. It looks particularly at its development in the United Kingdom since the election of a Labour Government in 1997 and, in that context, the implementation of a Social Inclusion Strategy by a County Council referred to throughout as ‘Someshire’. It offers as an example of reflective inquiry an evaluation of aspects of the implementation of the Strategy led by the Council’s Education Department and some comments on the Council’s own, previous, evaluation of the whole Strategy. Through this study, it engages with a range of stakeholders including schools, County Council Officers and representatives of parents and school governors in an attempt to discover what has gone well and why. It concludes with a set of recommendations for action by a range of parties who, in their different policy contexts, might wish to promote social inclusion.\ud \ud Finally, this study has been written by a senior Local Education Authority Officer. This results in the emergence of two voices within it. In Chapter 1 there can be perceived the voice of the traditional researcher, attempting what Schon describes as the ‘technical rationality’ of traditional research. In Chapters 2, 4 and, to some extent, 5 the voice changes to that of the ‘reflective practitioner’ with its reliance on the ability to intuit, know-in-action, an ability derived from over thirty years working in education, principally as an educational manager

Topics: HM
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2456

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1995). 100 Because his experimenting [in this situation] is a kind of action .... his reflection can proceed in situations of uncertainty because it is not based on the dichotomies of Technical Rationality".
  2. (1983). 60 Positivism Into this void Schon has brought his concept of the reflective practitioner what he refers to as "the distinctive structure of reflection in action"
  3. (1983). 62 In this process the professional defines the problem by "naming the things to which [they] will attend and frame the context in which [they] will attend to them" (Schon
  4. (1987). 70 Comment on the success or otherwise of this format is made in Chapter 4. Inevitably the size of the sample for the questionnaire was constrained by resource limitations, principally 'time. As Patton
  5. (1995). A blank example of the questionnaire is attached at Appendix B. Its design was informed by a number of principles, garnered from the literature (e. g. Munn & Drever
  6. (2003). a matter emphasized as important by the National Audit Office in its 2005 study (p3). Nevertheless, these schools did lay emphasis on the importance of school values and sign up to them (see Riley
  7. (1999). a Technical adequacy. Given reassurance about utility, feasibility and proper conduct, the evaluation must then be carried out with technical skill and sensitivity.
  8. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research,
  9. (1999). Arena Scottish Social Inclusion Network
  10. (1996). Education for the Nation, London Cassell
  11. (2002). Foundation Stage Review Someshire County Council
  12. (2001). Government's Response to the Fifth Report from the Committee, Session 1997-98: Disaffected Children. London. The Stationery Office Howarth
  13. (2002). How Local Authorities Can Make a Difference. Local Authorities & Social Exclusion Network Report 10: Local Government Information Unit
  14. (1995). it is also formative for any next stages of the Council's Strategy, in that it attempts to address the difficult but important (see Yin 1993 p38) questions about how and why success has or has not been achieved. It might be described in Mohr's terms
  15. (1974). Les exclus : Un Francais sur dix 2nd ed Paris, Seuil Levitas R
  16. (2001). Local Partnerships & Social Exclusion in the European Union. New Forms of Social Government Studies of Government in Public Policy, London: Routledge & New York Routledge Gewirtz doi
  17. (1994). Measuring Quality. Education Indicators.
  18. (1990). of the Evaluation Advisory Committee of the Schools Council, writing specifically about the field of education and quoted in Norris
  19. (1999). Real World Research :A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners, Oxford: Blackwell Room G (Ed)
  20. (1993). Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education at the University of Warwick. doi
  21. (1998). The Falmer Press Robinson P& Oppenheim C
  22. (2002). The Impact of the National Strategies -
  23. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner A Crisis of Confidence For Schon
  24. (1990). The Stationery Office Norris N
  25. (1999). the'relevant' meetings - In summary the review has failed to adhere to either the Guiding Principles or the Utility Standards approved by the American Evaluation Society. It might have been sensible in these circumstances to have taken Robson's advice
  26. (2004). This is graphically illustrated and summarised in an article in the Public Agenda Section of The Times (p9) on 26th
  27. (1983). This model of Technical Rationality owes its origins to what Schon describes
  28. (2004). through its Children Act
  29. (1995). uk O'Keeffe DJ

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.