Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The impact of Bt cotton on poor households in rural India

By Subramanian Arjunan and Matin Qaim


The impact of genetically modified (GM) crops on the poor in developing countries is still the subject of controversy. While previous studies have examined direct productivity effects of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton and other GM crops, little is known about wider socioeconomic outcomes. We use a microeconomic modelling approach and comprehensive survey data from India to analyse welfare and distribution effects in a typical village economy. Bt cotton adoption increases returns to labour, especially for hired female workers. Likewise, aggregate household incomes rise, including for poor and vulnerable farmers. Hence, Bt cotton contributes to poverty reduction and rural development

Topics: SB
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India. doi
  2. (2007). Bias from farmer self selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: evidence from Indian data. doi
  3. (2008). Bt Cotton and Farmers Suicides
  4. (2005). Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects. doi
  5. (2009). Bt cotton in India: development of benefits and the role of government seed price interventions. Under review in AgBioForum.
  6. (2003). Bt cotton in India: field trial results and economic projections. doi
  7. (2005). Explaining contradictory evidence regarding impacts of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Varietal performance of transgenic cotton in India, doi
  8. (2006). Farm-level economic performance of genetically modified cotton in doi
  9. Friends of the Earth (2008) Who Benefits from GM Crops? The Rise
  10. (2008). Genetically modified rice, yields and pesticides: assessing farm-level productivity effects doi
  11. (2007). Global Status of Commercialised Biotech/GM Crops:
  12. (2001). Impact of Bt cotton in China. doi
  13. (1996). Impact of rural industrialization on village life and economy: a SAM approach. doi
  14. (1988). Life in a Mexican village: a SAM perspective. doi
  15. (2007). Naturalising transgenics: official seeds, loose seeds and risk in the decision matrix of Gujarati cotton farmers. doi
  16. (2002). Plant biotechnology in doi
  17. (2007). Plant breeding and poverty: can transgenic seeds replicate the ‘Green Revolution’ as a source of gains for the poor? doi
  18. (2008). Potential impacts of Bt eggplant on economic surplus and farmers’ health in India. doi
  19. (2007). Poverty and hunger special feature: absolute poverty measures for the developing world, 1981–2004. doi
  20. (2001). Poverty Estimates for 1999-2000,
  21. (2008). Recent and prospective adoption of genetically modified cotton: a global computable general equilibrium analysis of economic impacts. doi
  22. (2007). Socioeconomic Impact of Bt Cotton.
  23. (2007). Stealth seeds: bioproperty, biosafety, biopolitics. doi
  24. (2007). Supplying crop biotechnology to the poor: opportunities and constraints, doi
  25. (2006). The Adoption and Economics of Bt Cotton in India: Preliminary Results from a Study, Working Paper No.
  26. (2007). The impact of agricultural biotechnology on yields, risks, and biodiversity in low-income countries, doi
  27. (2004). The State of Food and Agriculture; Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor? (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). doi
  28. (1990). The transmission of production fluctuation and technical change in a village economy: a social accounting matrix approach. doi
  29. (1990). Village and Household Economies in India’s Semi-Arid Tropics (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins
  30. (1996). Village Economies: The Design, Estimation, and Use of Villagewide Economic Models (Cambridge: doi
  31. (2009). Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: the case of Bt cotton in India. doi
  32. (2004). Why Bt cotton pays for small-scale producers in South Africa, doi
  33. (2007). World Development Report 2008; Agriculture for Development doi
  34. (2002). World poverty and the role of agricultural technology: direct and indirect effects. doi
  35. (2003). Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.