Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Understanding fixed effects in human well-being

By Christopher J. Boyce

Abstract

In studies of subjective well-being, economists and other researchers typically use a fixed or random effect estimation to control for unobservable heterogeneity across individuals. Such individual heterogeneity, although substantially reducing the estimated effect of many characteristics, is little understood. This paper shows that personality measures can account for 20% of this heterogeneity and a further 13% can be accounted for by other observable between-person information. This paper then demonstrates that the use of personality measures, in a new technique developed by [Plumper, T., Troeger, V.E. (2007). Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects, Political Analysis, 15(2), 124-139.], can help researchers obtain improved estimates for important characteristics such as marital status, disability and income. The paper argues that this has important practical implications

Topics: HB, BF
Publisher: Elsevier BV
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2527

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness, in:
  2. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis a study on the 5 factor model of personality, doi
  3. (2007). Conscientiousness predicts disease progression (CD4 number and viral load) in people living with HIV, doi
  4. (1946). Description and measurement of personality doi
  5. (2006). Do divorcing couples become happier by breaking up?, doi
  6. (2007). Efficient estimation of time invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects, doi
  7. (2006). Estimating the effect of personality on male and female earnings,
  8. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, doi
  9. (2007). Happiness and loss aversion: Is utility concave or convex in relative income?, doi
  10. (2005). Heterogeneity in reported well being: Evidence from twelve European countries, doi
  11. (1999). History of modern personality theory and research, in:
  12. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?, doi
  13. (2005). How important is your personality? Labor market returns to personality for women in the US and UK, doi
  14. (2001). Incentive enhancing preferences: Personality, behavior, and earnings, doi
  15. (2005). Income and well being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect, doi
  16. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well being happy and unhappy people, doi
  17. (2008). Job satisfaction and family happiness: The part time work puzzle, doi
  18. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis, doi
  19. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English, doi
  20. (2004). Money does matter! Evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in East Germany following reunification, doi
  21. (2005). Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well being, doi
  22. (1999). Personality and subjective well being, in: doi
  23. (2005). Personality and subjective well being: Big Five correlates and demographic variables, doi
  24. (1990). Personality in adulthood doi
  25. (1988). Personality in adulthood a 6 year longitudinal study of self reports and spouse ratings on the Neo Personality Inventory, doi
  26. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing, doi
  27. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation doi
  28. (1978). Pooling of time series and cross section data, doi
  29. (2001). Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness, doi
  30. (2006). Psychological well being and ill being: Do they have distinct or mirrored biological correlates?, doi
  31. (2008). Representative trust and reciprocity: Prevalence and determinants, doi
  32. (2007). Social comparison affects reward related brain activity in the human ventral striatum, doi
  33. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics, doi
  34. (1979). Stability of behavior .1. Predicting most of the people much of the time, doi
  35. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives, in:
  36. (2001). The determinants of earnings: A behavioral approach, doi
  37. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits, doi
  38. (2005). The effects of personality on earnings, doi
  39. (2001). Throwing out the baby with the bath water: A comment on doi
  40. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment, doi
  41. (1987). Validation of the 5 factor model of personality across instruments and observers, doi
  42. (2004). Well being over time in Britain and the USA, doi
  43. (2004). When information dominates comparison Learning from Russian subjective panel data, doi
  44. (2009). Which personality types have the highest marginal utilities of income?
  45. (1998). Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data, doi
  46. (2005). Zur erhebung der Big Fivebasierten personlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.