Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Politics of recognition: what can a human rights perspective contribute to understanding users' experiences of involvement in mental health services?

By Lydia Lewis

Abstract

This historically situated, UK-based review of New Labour's human rights and mental health policy following the 1998 Human Rights Act (HRA) and 2007 Mental Health Act (MHA), draws on Klug's identification of three waves of human rights. These occurred around the American and French Revolutions, after World War II, and following the collapse of state communism in 1989, and the article assesses impacts on mental health policy up to and including the New Labour era. It critiques current equality and rights frameworks in mental health and indicates how they might be brought into closer alignment with third wave principles

Topics: JC, RA
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2534

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2007). (Mis)recognition, social inequality and social justice: a critical social policy perspective’, doi
  2. 272Politics of Recognition Fraser,N.(1999),‘Socialjusticeintheageofidentitypolitics:redistribution,recognitionandparticipation’,
  3. (1997). A Framework for Mental Health Services in Scotland, Edinburgh: Scottish Office.
  4. A Healthier Future: A Twenty Year Vision for health and Wellbeing in Northern Ireland,
  5. A New Public Involvement Structure for NHS Scotland: Patient Focus and Public Involvement, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  6. (2004). A politics of recognition and respect: involving people with experience of poverty in decision-making that affects their lives’, doi
  7. A Stronger Local Voice: A Framework for Creating a Stronger Local Voice in the Development of Health and Social Care Services,
  8. (2009). A third wave, not a third way? New Labour, human rights and mental health in historical context’, doi
  9. (2006). Changing the mental health system – a survivor’s view’, doi
  10. (1997). Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, doi
  11. (2000). Comparing patients” experience of mental health services in England: a five-trust survey’, doi
  12. (2005). Competence, identity and intersubjectivity: applying habermas’s theory of communicative action to service user involvement in mental health policy making’, Social Theory and Health, doi
  13. (2005). Creating a Patient-led NHS: Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan,
  14. (2000). Critical Perspectives on Mental Health, doi
  15. (2006). Delivering for Mental Health, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  16. (1994). Dependency” demystified: inscriptions of power in a keyword of the welfare state’, doi
  17. (2007). Developing mental health policy: a human rights perspective’,
  18. (2005). Disabling politics?
  19. (2003). Distorted beyond all recognition: a rejoinder to Axel Honneth’,
  20. (2000). Emotional Life and the Politics of Welfare, doi
  21. (2000). Executive Health Department
  22. (1991). Experts, lies and stereotypes’, The Health Service Journal,
  23. (2005). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse, doi
  24. (1999). Good enough principles for welfare’, doi
  25. (2003). Health Division (2003), An Introduction to the Mental Health (Care and Treatment)
  26. (2006). It’s important that they learn from us for mental health to progress’, doi
  27. (1997). Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, doi
  28. (1992). Language and Symbolic Power, doi
  29. (2007). Marginalised or enabled voices? “User participation” in policy and practice’, doi
  30. (2006). Mental disorder and human rights’,
  31. (2009). Mental health and human rights: a common agenda for user/survivor and women’s groups?’, Policy and Politics (forthcoming). doi
  32. Mental Health Bill 2006–7, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/pabills/200607/ mental_health.htm DoH (2007c), Human Rights in Healthcare: A Framework for Local Action, London: Department of Health.
  33. (2007). Mental health policy and mental health service user perspectives on involvement: a discourse analysis’, doi
  34. Mental Health: New Ways of Working for Everyone, London: Department of Health.
  35. (1999). National Service Framework for Mental Health, London: The Stationery Office. doi
  36. (2004). Not being mentally ill: social movements, system survivors and the oppositional habitus’, doi
  37. (2000). of Health, Social Services and Public Safety
  38. (2003). On Our Own Terms: Users and Survivors of Mental Health Services Working Together for Support and Change, London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
  39. Our Health, Our Care, doi
  40. (2005). Participation, discourse and power: a case study in service user involvement’, doi
  41. Partnership for Care: Scotland’s Health White Paper, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  42. (2001). Patient Focus and Public Involvement, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  43. (2004). Patients or partners? Case studies of user involvement in the planning and delivery of adult mental health services in London’, doi
  44. (1959). Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, doi
  45. (2009). Psychiatric survivors and “experiential rights”’, doi
  46. (2009). Psychosis and human rights: conflicts in mental health policy and practice’, doi
  47. (2004). Public involvement in health care’, doi
  48. (1991). Pulling down churches”: accounting for the British mental health users’ movement’, doi
  49. (2008). Real Involvement: Working with People to Improve Health Services,
  50. (2001). Recognition without ethics’, doi
  51. (2003). Redistribution as Recognition’, doi
  52. (2003). Redistribution or Recognition? A Political–Philosophical Exchange, doi
  53. (2007). Reframing justice in a globalising world’,
  54. (1994). Researching women’s lives or studying women’s oppression? Reflections on what constitutes feminist research’,
  55. (2000). Rethinking recognition’,
  56. (2000). Service users knowledges and social work theory: conflict or collaboration?’, doi
  57. (2006). Should service user involvement be consigned to history? A critical realist perspective’, doi
  58. (1998). Social identity and social policy: engagements with postmodern theory’, doi
  59. (2008). Social policy and human rights: re-thinking the engagement’, doi
  60. (2002). Social work: gender, care and justice’, doi
  61. Sustainable Patient Focus and Public Involvement, Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
  62. (2001). The discourse of new labour: critical discourse analysis’, doi
  63. (1999). The future of mental health services’,
  64. (2005). The Impact of Inequality, doi
  65. The Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act, doi
  66. The Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide, doi
  67. (2000). The NHS Plan – A Plan for Investment: A Plan for Reform, London: Department of Health. doi
  68. (1992). The politics of recognition’,
  69. (1999). The service user/survivor movement’,
  70. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (trans. Joel Andersen), doi
  71. (1982). The subject and power’, doi
  72. (1998). User involvement in mental health service development: how far can it go?’, doi
  73. (1997). User involvement in services – incorporation or challenge?’, doi
  74. (2005). User involvement within Scottish mental health policy: locating power and inequality’, doi
  75. (2001). Users’ Voices: The Perspectives of Mental Health Service Users on Community and Hospital Care, London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.