Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Spear-carriers or speaking parts?: arts practitioners in the cultural policy process

By Jane Woddis

Abstract

This thesis investigates the role of arts practitioners in cultural policy activity, both as a general concern for cultural policy studies and in the specific arena of post-war cultural policy in Britain. In so doing it challenges a common perception that arts practitioners have no such involvement, and seeks to discover the extent and form of their activity. it explores the history of practitioners’ participation in cultural policy formation and implementation; what obstacles they have faced and how their involvement could be better facilitated; and, importantly, why it matters whether they are involved. These issues have remained largely unrecognised among cultural policy researchers.\ud \ud Part II of the thesis examines the subject through a case study of new playwriting policy in England. Drawing on unpublished primary documents, interviews, and observation, it pays particular attention to playwrights’ organisations and their history of self-directed activity. These organisations and other agencies concerned with theatre writing are embedded in networks which cross the boundaries of policy and creative practice. The thesis argues that arts practitioners can enhance their place in the policy process through their own actions, and that participation in these networks increases their opportunity for policy input and influence.\ud \ud Of key importance is the question as to why the involvement of practitioners in cultural policy activity is of any significance. The thesis puts forward the view that arts practitioners and their organisations can be seen as part of the fabric of civil society, and their participation in policy activity as contributing to the maintenance and enlargement of democratic life. It is, then, not a marginal issue, nor of concern to the arts alone, but integral to a wider debate about sustaining democratic engagement and the civic arena in the twenty-first century

Topics: CB, PN2000
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2591

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). A Place For Us: How to Make Societe' Civil and Democracy Strong.
  2. (1965). A Policy for the Arts: The First Steps.
  3. (1973). A Retort to King and Blaug: The Arts Council and Its Critics.
  4. (1947). Annual Report and Accounts. doi
  5. (1998). Are the Authors Still Alive? On copyright in a cultural policy perspective. doi
  6. (1978). Artists and People. doi
  7. Arts Council of England (1995,1996a) Annual Report.
  8. Arts Council of England (1996b, 2nd ed'n) The arts funding system: An introduction to the components of the UK arts funding system.
  9. Arts Council of England (1996c) The Policy for Drama of the English Arts Funding System.
  10. Arts Council of England (1996d) A Synopsis of 'the Responses to the Consultation Paper.
  11. (1986). Arts Council of England (2000a) : Artstat: Digest of Arts, Statistics and Trends in the UK
  12. Arts Council of England (2000c) National Policy for Theatre in England.
  13. Arts Council of Great Britain (1980b) The Arts Council of ' Great Britain and the Regional Arts Associations: Towards a New Relationship - Report of an Informal A'GB/RAA Working Group.
  14. Arts Council of Great Britain (1993b) A Creative Future: The way forward for the arts, crafts and media in
  15. (1982). Arts Worlds.
  16. (1981). At the Royal Court: doi
  17. Audit Commission [1999] Listen up! Effective community consultation. Briefing. London: Audit Commission.
  18. (1981). Bloodied but not Bold: The Arts Council of Great Britain. doi
  19. (1991). British Cultural Policies 1970-1990.
  20. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. doi
  21. (1996). Citizenship, empowerment and the poor - local government anti poverty strategies.
  22. (2000). Civil society and violence: A critique of * doi
  23. (1974). Community arts: The Report of ' the Community Arts Working Party.
  24. (2000). Contradictions: The uncivilising pressures of 'space, time and function.
  25. (1994). Cultural Policy and the aesthetics of " industrialism. doi
  26. (1996). Cultural Policy and the Crisis of ' Legitimacy: Entrepreneurial Answers in the United Kingdom. Coventry: Centre for the Study of Cultural Policy,
  27. (1995). Cultural Policy in the United Kingdom: Collapsing Rationales and the End of a Tradition. doi
  28. (1997). Cultural Policy, Cultural Pessimism and Postmodernity. doi
  29. (2001). Culture and civil society: new relationships with the third sector. Cultural Policies Research and Development Unit,
  30. (1998). Culture and Policy - Acting on the Social. doi
  31. (1993). Culture and Regions of '
  32. (2000). Culture, Media and Sport doi
  33. Culture, Media and Sport (1999a) Guidance for Local Authorities on Local Cultural Strategies: Consultation Draft.
  34. Culture, Media and Sport (1999b) Arts and Sport: Policy Action Team 10 -A Report to the Social Exclusion Unit.
  35. (1990). Decision Taking in the Fieldwork Process: Theoretical Sampling and Collaborative Working',
  36. (1996). Democracy and Accountability in Public Bodies: New Agendas doi
  37. (2002). Development Directorate Culture and Leisure
  38. (2002). ed'n) Policy.
  39. (2001). European Governance -A White Paper. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  40. (1998). Evaluation of 'local authority arts policies. London: Arts Council of England.
  41. (1975). Foreword' to Browne, Terry W. Playwrights' Theatre: The English Stage Company at the Royal Court Theatre. doi
  42. (1989). Glory Reflected: A Progress Report on `The Glory of the Garden'.
  43. (1993). Gramsci and the Italian State. Manchester: doi
  44. (1980). Hegemony and Revolution: A Study of 'Antonio Gramsci's Political and Cultural Theory. doi
  45. (2000). Intellectuals, Culture, Policy: The Technical, the Practical and the Critical. Milton Keynes: Pavis Centre for Social and Cultural Research,
  46. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. doi
  47. (1996). Labour and Citizenship: The Development of Welfare State Regimes. doi
  48. (1993). Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Democratization', doi
  49. (1991). Local Authorities and the Arts', in Challans, Tim and Anthony Sargent Local Authorities and the Arts. National Arts and Media Strategy Discussion Document. London: Arts Council of Great Britain.
  50. (1974). New Drama and the Arts Council of 'Great
  51. (1976). On the Performing Arts: The Anatomy of their Economic Problems',
  52. (1980). Other Spaces: New Theatre and the RSC.
  53. (1978). Playwrights Front and Centre: the O Neill Conference at Work.
  54. (1987). Playwrights' Progress: Patterns of Postwar British Drama.
  55. (1975). Playwrights' Theatre: The English Stage Company at the Royal Court Theatre. doi
  56. (2003). Putting the "Art" back into Arts Policy Making: How Arts Policy has been "Captured" by the Economists and the Marketeers. doi
  57. (1993). State of play: new work in the contemporary British theatre. Lecture delivered to the Royal Society of Arts,
  58. (1977). Super Ministry - or Village Post Office? Theatre Quarterly,
  59. (1981). The Arts Council phenomenon: A conference report. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
  60. (1978). The Arts the way forward: A Conservative Discussion Paper. London: Conservative Political Centre.
  61. (1998). The Comprehensive Spending Review: A New Approach to Investment in Culture. Formatted by West Midlands Arts.
  62. (1977). The Death of the Author', in Barthes, Roland Image Music Text. London: doi
  63. (1984). The Development of Playwrights' Workshops -a Perspective.
  64. (1984). The Glory of'the Garden: Y he Development of f the Arts in England -A St. rat. egy, for a Decade.
  65. (1998). The Good Research Guide for small-scale research projects. doi
  66. (1983). The Implementing Organization: Exploring the Black Box
  67. (1998). The Move From Government to Governance: Irish development policy's paradigm shift. doi
  68. (2003). The Nordic Cultural Model. Copenhagen: Nordic Cultural Institute. doi
  69. (1996). The potential and limits of cultural policy strategies.
  70. (1991). The Privilege of the Producer', in Keat, Russell and Nicholas Abercrombie (eds) Enterprise Culture. doi
  71. (1996). The professional drama sector in England -a statistical profile. London: Arts Council of England.
  72. (1977). The Statistics of ' doi
  73. (1970). The Theatre Today in England and Wales: The Report of the Arts Council Theatre Enquiry.
  74. (2004). The Torn Halves of * Cultural Policy Research. doi
  75. (1986). Theatre Is For All: Report of "
  76. (1992). Towards a National Arts and Media Strategy.
  77. (1997). Towards Cultural Democracy: Contradiction and Crisis in British
  78. (1992). Useful Culture. doi
  79. (1996). Users, officials and citizens in Health and Social care. Local Government Policy Making,
  80. (2002). What is civil society? http: //www. Ise. ac. uk/collections/CCS/Whatis civil sociely.
  81. (1996). When Theatre was for All: the Cork Report, after Ten Years. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.