Location of Repository

Subsidies and countervailing measures under the GATT and the WTO and in the US law and practice: parallel developments and interactions

By Giuseppe Marco Maria La Barca

Abstract

Although the number of subsidy and countervailing duty cases, both at national and WTO level is declining, they still hold centre stage in the trade wars that are the hallmark of modern international economy. Suffice it to mention the “Foreign Sales Corporations” case, the “softwood lumber” cases and the ongoing “US-EC large civil aircraft” dispute. There are several reasons for this. On the one hand, the multilateral regulation of subsidies can strongly impinge on governmental autonomy in the management of the national economy. On the other, the boundaries of subsidisation are often quite uncertain as subsidies can overlap with quite distinct areas in the public management of the economy, such as taxation.\ud \ud Probably as a result of the foregoing factors, the multilateral discipline on subsidies was slow to develop and it is only with the Uruguay Round that a fully fledged, wide-ranging regime took shape, while the identification of countervailable subsidies and the conditions under which they can be countered have been left for long to domestic countervailing duty proceedings. The United States, for a long time the main user of CVD proceedings, developed a much more sophisticated and detailed regime than the GATTs. The competitive margin provided by US administrative practice has enabled it to impose its perspective on the shaping of the multilateral regime, firstly as a result of the Uruguay Round negotiations, and secondly because of the creative interpretation of the WTO rules, especially by the Appellate Body. On the other hand, in implementing the WTO regime the United States has often been able to withstand attempts to change its domestic regime, although some of its aspects are not necessarily consistent with the WTO rules.\ud \ud The success of the United States, however, has been far from complete as the US has not been able to impose its viewpoint on decisive aspects of the subsidy regulation in the GATT and in the WTO system

Topics: HF
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2623

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1995). 0. American Trade Policy. A Tragedy in the Making. Washington D. C.: The
  2. (1984). 0., After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Econom . doi
  3. (1950). 11 BISD, 188 Italian Discrimination against Imported Agricultural Machinery, Report Adopted by the Contracting Parties on 23
  4. (1982). 11, "Government Equity Participation in State Owned Enterprises: An Analysis of the Carbon Steel Countervailing Duty Cases", Law &PoITInt'l
  5. (2004). A Cruel Trilemma: The Flawed Political Economy of Remedies to WTO Subsidies Disputes",
  6. (1974). A Morrone"The Michelin Decision: A Possible New Direction for U.
  7. (1990). A Search for Economic and Financial Principles in the Administration of United States Countervailing Duty,
  8. (1985). Agricultural Tillage Tools from Brazil; Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  9. (1995). American Trade Policy doi
  10. An Analysis of Foreign Sales Corporations and the European Four Billion-Dollars Retaliation",
  11. An Analysis of the Gatt compatibility of the New Foreign Sales Corporations"
  12. An Analysis of the Proposed Subsidies Code Procedure in the "Dunkel Text" of the Uruguay Round. The Canadian Exporter's Case".
  13. (2004). Antidumping and Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000. A Renewed Debate",
  14. (1991). Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law: The United States and the GATT"'
  15. (1988). Antidumping and Duty Law Provisions of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act
  16. (2005). Antidumping and Other Trade Protection Lmvs of the EC. The Hague:
  17. (1990). Assistance to industry and industrial adjustment: an overview of economic effects of industrial subsidies,
  18. (2002). Avoiding a Nuclear Trade War: Strategies for retaining Tax Incentives for U. S. Corporations in a post FSC World",
  19. Beating Them at Their Own Game: A Solution to the US Foreign Sales Corporation Crisis",
  20. (1986). Beyond Normalcy in the Regulation of International Trade", doi
  21. (1977). Bounty or Grant". A Call for Redefinition in Light of the Zenith Decision" Law &PoITInt'l Bus.
  22. (1985). Calculating Subsidy Values in Countervailing Duty Cases: The Use of the Present Value Methodology", in
  23. (1988). Cam bridge, % I assachumis: Fhe
  24. (1985). Canadian Meat Council v. United States, doi
  25. Carbon-Steel Structural Shapes, Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Plate and Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Bars from the United Kingdom, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, doi
  26. (2001). Ceramic Tile from Mexico, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  27. Chevron Deference and The Charming Betsy: Is There a Place for the Schooner in the Standard of Review of Commerce Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Determinations? ", Fed Cir.
  28. (1989). Chilled and Frozen Pork from Canada, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination; doi
  29. (1977). Countervailing Duties in the GATT Present Law and Future Prospects"
  30. Countervailing Duties", doi
  31. Countervailing Duty Determinations", Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus.
  32. (1985). Countervailing Duty Law and the principle of General Availability",
  33. Countervailing Duty Law: an Economic Perspective, doi
  34. (1988). Countervailing Duty Laws and Subsidies to Imperfectly Competitive Industries", in Robert E. Baldwin et All., eds,
  35. (1999). Cut to Length Carbon Steel Plate from Belgium, Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,
  36. (1983). CVD Investip-ations Carbon Black from Mexico; Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order,
  37. Delverde and the WTO's British Steel Decision Foreshadow more Conflict where the WTO Subsidies Agreement, Privatization, and United States Countervailing Duty Law Intersect",
  38. (1926). Downs v United States,
  39. (1999). EC Anti-Subsidy Law and Practice After he Uruguay Round. A woolf in Shep's Clothing",
  40. (2001). Electrical Steel from Italy, Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,
  41. (1997). Elisabeth Keeling Revenue Law.
  42. (1993). Enforcing International Trade Law. The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. Butterworth Legal Publishers, doi
  43. (1999). Essays in the Nature ofInternational Trade Policy.
  44. (1999). Essential of United States Taxation. La Hague:
  45. Export Credits. An International and Domestic Legal Analysis",
  46. (1976). Export Subsidies
  47. (1980). Export Subsidies and Developing Countries,
  48. (1977). Export Subsidies by Developing Countries: Issues of Policy. Geneva: Graduate Institute of Intemational studies,
  49. Export Subsidies under the MTN. An Analysis with particular Emphasis on developing countries",
  50. (1999). Fairness and Reciprocity" in International Trade. Section 301 and the Ru le of Law",
  51. (1990). Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, doi
  52. (1995). Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  53. Final Countervai ling Duty Determination ýkith Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada - Recourse by Canada to Article 21.5 (DS257) - doi
  54. Foreign Sales Corporations - Subsidies, Sanctions and Trade Wars,
  55. Foreign Sales Corporations Replace Domestic International Sales Corporations"
  56. (2000). Foreign Sales Corporations under the WTO. The Panel Ruling on US Export Subsidies",
  57. Gatt-Based Protectionism and the Definition of a Subsidy",
  58. (2000). Geneva Steel v.
  59. (1992). Historical Institutionalism in Comparatiý e Politics", doi
  60. (1999). Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel Product from Brazil, Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination: 64FR8313,
  61. (2002). How a Taxing Problem Has Taken its Toll: A Common Person's Guide to an International Taxation Dispute",
  62. (1999). Ideas and Policies",
  63. (1998). Implementation of the Uruguay Round Results in the United States"
  64. (1976). Income Tax Practices Maintained by Belgium. Report of the Panel presented to the Council of Representatives on 12-
  65. (1976). Income Tax Practices Maintained by France. Report of the Panel presented to the
  66. (2003). Industrial Subsidies: Tax Treatment of Foreign Sales Corporations", doi
  67. (1992). International business taxation: a study in the internationalization of business regulation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, doi
  68. International Decisions: United States - Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act", doi
  69. (2002). International Tax Primer. The Hague:
  70. (1984). International Trade Policy for Oligopolistic Industry", doi
  71. (1995). International Trade Regulation. doi
  72. Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective", Global Governance,
  73. (1983). ITC Injury Determination in Countervailing Duty Investigations", Law &PoPY Int'l Bus.
  74. (2004). Killing the Byrd Amendment with the right stone", doi
  75. Knick-Knack Paddy Whack Leave the FSC Alone: An Analysis of the WTO Panel Ruling That the U. S. Foreign Sales Corporations Program is an Illegal Export Subsidy Under the GATT",
  76. (2002). Legal Problems of International Economic Relations. Cases,
  77. Live Swine and Fresh Chilled and Frozen Pork Products from Canada, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  78. (1992). Lumber Products from Canada, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, doi
  79. Lumber Products from Canada, Notice of Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Notice of Final Negative Critical Circumstances Determnation, doi
  80. (1995). Managing Official Export Credit. The Questfor a Global Regime. Washington D. doi
  81. (1969). Mutiny against the Bounty: An Examination of Subsidies Border Tax Adjustments",
  82. (2002). Notes & Comments: United States'Tax Treatment for Foreign Sales Corporations",
  83. (1996). Pasta from Italy, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  84. (1987). Peckron Harold S., "Uniform Rules of Engagement: The New tax Regime for Foreign Sales", Hastings Int'l
  85. (1999). Plate in Coils from Italy, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  86. (1254). plc v.
  87. (1996). Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  88. (1989). Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Countervailing Duty Administrative Review. 54Fr 1753,
  89. Products from Austria, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  90. (1986). Products from Canada, Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, doi
  91. (1982). Products from France, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  92. Products from the Federal Republic of Germany, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determiation,
  93. (1986). Protectionism and Canadian Trade Policy",
  94. (1986). Recent International Trade Commission Practice Regarding the Material Injury Standard. A Critique, Law &PoVYInt'l
  95. (1991). Redefining Actionable Subsidies under U. doi
  96. (1995). Reshaping the World Trading System. Geneva: World Trade Organization,
  97. Rethinking Tax-Based Export Incentives: Converting Repeated Defeats Before the WTO into Positive Tax Policy",
  98. (1994). Richard Lyal, EC Tax Law.
  99. Rod from Trinidad and Tobago, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  100. (1993). Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products from the United Kingdom, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 58FR6237,
  101. Ruggero Ranieri and Joost Dankers "The Emergence of New Competitors nations in the European Steel Industry: ltaly and the Netherlands, 1945-65, doi
  102. (1999). Stainless Sheet and Steel in Coil from France, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  103. (2001). Steel Bar from Italy, Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination 66 FR 30414,
  104. (1984). Steel Flat-Rolled Products from Korea; Final Affirmative Determination; Carbon Steel Structural Shapes from Korea, Final Negative Countervailing Duty Determination,
  105. (1800). Steel Products from Argentina, Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order,
  106. (1977). Subsidies and Countervailing Duties - Analysis and a Proposal Lau, & PoI'v Int'l Bus.
  107. (1995). Subsidies and Countervailing Measures after the Uruguay Round: an Overview",
  108. (1986). Subsidies and Countervailing Measures",
  109. Subsidies and Natural Resources: Congress Rejects a Lateral Attack on the Specificity Test"',
  110. (1990). Subsidies in Extemal Trade Law of the EEC,
  111. (1990). Subsidies paid to Processors and Producers of Oilseeds and Related Animal Feed Proteins. Report by the Panel adopted on 25 doi
  112. (1980). Subsidies, Countervailing Duties and Antidumping" after the Tokyo Round",
  113. (1997). Subsidy Regulation and State Transformation in North America the GAITand the EU Houndmills and London:
  114. (1980). Tax Incentives for Exports, permissible and Proscraibed: An Analysis of the Corporate Income Tax Implications of the MTA Subsidies Code",
  115. (1976). Tax legislation (DISC). Report of the Panel presented to the
  116. (1980). Taxes in France (Adapted by FranVis Lefebvre's Les Imp6ts en France).
  117. (1994). The doi
  118. (2003). The Byrd Amendment Battle: American Trade Policy at the WTO",
  119. (2002). The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000: 'Relief for the U. S. Steel Industry; Trouble for the United States in the WTO", doi
  120. (1982). The Definition of "Export Subsides"
  121. (2002). The Foreign Sales Corporation Drama: Reaching the Last Act? Int'l Econ.
  122. (1986). The Foreign Sales Corporation Legislation: A$ 10 million Boondoggle "
  123. (1980). The GATT Codes and the Unconditional Most Favoured-Nation Principle",
  124. (1995). The GATT Rules for Industrial Subsidies and Countervailing Duties in the New Round. The Weather and the Seeds",
  125. (1999). The Hague: Kluwer Law Intemational,
  126. The Jurisprudence of International Trade: The DISC Case in GATT", doi
  127. The Lingering Problem with the Specificity Test in the United States Countervailing Duty Law",
  128. (2000). The Lint,
  129. (1986). The Meaning of Subsidy and Injury in Countervailing Duty Law, doi
  130. (1992). The Movement from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic policy in the 1970s", doi
  131. (1979). The Negotiations of a Code on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Bridging Fundamental Policy Differences" Law and Pol Int I Buss.
  132. (1982). The Political Economy of Administered Protection",
  133. (1985). The Political Economy of US Import Policy. doi
  134. (1989). The Specificity Test under US Countervailing Law",
  135. (2001). The Third Strike: The United States' attempts at Achieving Tax Par4 Between its Income Tax and European Value-Added Tax"
  136. (1979). The Trade Agreements Act of 1979: Executive Agreements, Subsidies, and Countervailing Duties ",
  137. The Uruguay Round Agreement on Subsidies. A Forward Looking Assessment,
  138. (1994). The Uruguay Round. An Assessment. Washington
  139. (2003). The World Trade Organisation. Law Practice and Policy.
  140. (1996). The World Trade Organization: the multilateral trade ftameworkfor the 21" century and US. implementing legislation,
  141. (1997). The World Trading System. Law and Policy of International Economic Relations doi
  142. (1996). the WTO and the Future Agenda ",
  143. (1997). The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding - Misunderstandings on the Nature of the Legal Obligation, doi
  144. (1988). The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: 1-ess, is M ore".
  145. (1988). Trade Act".
  146. (1993). Trade Policy and the GA TTRegime. Itaha:
  147. Trade Related Performance Requirements under the GATT -
  148. (1999). Trade Warriors. Cam bridge:
  149. United States - European Union Dispute on Foreign-Source Income, Export Activity, and the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act, Hofstra L.
  150. United States Tax Subsidies Under DomesticInternational Sales Corporation, Foreign Sales Corporation and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act Legislation Within The Framework of The World Trade Organization",
  151. (1987). United States, doi
  152. (1919). United States, 322 F. 3d 1369 (203) Nicholas (G.
  153. (1984). Upstream Subsidies and USCountervai ling Duty Law,: The Nlexican Ammonia Decision and the Trade Remedies Reform Act of 1984", Law &Pol'Y
  154. (1985). Upstream Subsidies: Policy and Enforcement Questions after the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984", Law &PoVYInt'l Bus.
  155. (1989). What is a Countervailable Subsidy under
  156. When a New Sheriff Comes to Town: The Impending Showdown Between the US Trade Courts and the World Trade Organization",
  157. (1998). Wolf Alan Wm, "Problems with the WTO Dispute Settlement", Chi. J Int'l L,
  158. (1969). World Trade and the Law of GA IT A Legal Analysis of the General Agreemet.
  159. (2004). World Trade Organization Subsidy Discipline: Is This the "Retrenchment Round? ",
  160. (1985). xr__ Krauss Melvin B., "Border Tax Adjustments: A Potential Trans-Atlantic Trade Dispute",
  161. XVI: 3: Export Subsidies and Equitable Shares"

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.