Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Perspective: Is It Time for Advocacy Training in Medical Education?

By Daniel Croft, Stephen J. Jay, Eric M. Meslin, Margaret M. Gaffney and Jere D. Odell

Abstract

As the modern medical system becomes increasingly complex, a debate has arisen over the place of advocacy efforts within the medical profession. The authors argue that advocacy can help physicians fulfill their social contract. For physicians to become competent in patient-centered, clinical, administrative, or legislative advocacy, they require professional training. Many professional organizations have called for curricular reform to meet society's health needs during the past 30 years, and the inclusion of advocacy training in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education is supported on both pragmatic and ethical grounds. Undergraduate medical education, especially, is an ideal time for this training because a standard competency can be instilled across all specialties. Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education includes advocacy training in curricula for residency programs, few medical schools or residency programs have advocacy electives. By understanding the challenges of the health care system and how to change it for the better, physicians can experience increased professional satisfaction and effectiveness in improving patient care, systems-based practice, and public health

Topics: Consumer Advocacy, Medical Education, Physician's Role, Medical Ethics, Patient advocacy, Medicine -- Study and teaching, Medical ethics
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:scholarworks.iupui.edu:1805/3568
Provided by: IUPUIScholarWorks

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.