Location of Repository

Do some schools narrow the gap? Differential school effectiveness by ethnicity, gender, poverty and prior achievement

By Steve Strand

Abstract

This study analyses the educational progress of an entire national cohort of over 530,000 pupils in England between age 7 in 2000 and age 11 in 2004. The results show that Black Caribbean boys not entitled to free school meals, and particularly the more able pupils, made significantly less progress than their White British peers. There is no evidence that the gap results from Black Caribbean pupils attending less effective schools. There is also no evidence of differential effectiveness in relation to ethnic group; schools that were strong in facilitating the progress of White British pupils were equally strong in facilitating the progress of Black Caribbean pupils. There was some evidence of differential school effectiveness by pupil prior achievement, gender and poverty, but the absolute size of the effects were small. The results suggest the poor progress of Black Caribbean pupils reflects a systemic issue rather than the influence of a small number of ‘low quality’ schools

Topics: LB1501
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2717

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2001). Age distribution by ethnic group
  2. (1996). Back to the Future: the problem of change and the possibilities of advance in the sociology of education. doi
  3. (1997). Black masculinity and schooling: How black boys survive modern schooling. Stoke on Trent: Trentham books. doi
  4. (1997). Can school improvement overcome the effects of disadvantage? London: Institute of Education.Do some schools narrow the gap? doi
  5. (1985). Committee of Inquiry into the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups.
  6. (2006). Comparing the predictive validity of reasoning tests and national end of Key Stage 2 tests: which tests are the best? doi
  7. (2004). Differential School Effectiveness in Relation to Sex and Social Class: Some Implications for Policy Evaluation. doi
  8. (1993). Differential School Effectiveness: Results from a reanalysis of the Inner London Education Authority's Junior School Project Data. doi
  9. (1989). Differential school effectiveness. doi
  10. (2008). Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: A multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis. doi
  11. (1997). Differential Secondary School Effectiveness: Comparing the Performance of Different Pupil Groups. doi
  12. (1998). Does the Black White test score gap widen after children enter school? In
  13. (1970). Education cannot compensate for society.
  14. (1989). Effects of school and classroom characteristics on pupil progress in language and arithmetic. doi
  15. (2005). English language acquisition and educational achievement at the end of primary school. doi
  16. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity: Washington: Office of Education, doi
  17. (1999). Ethnic group, sex and economic disadvantage: Associations with pupils’ educational progress from Baseline to the end of Key Stage 1. doi
  18. (2006). Ethnicity and education. London: DfES. Available of the world wide web at: http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/DFES-0208-2006.pdf [accessed 27th
  19. (2009). Evidence of ethnic disproportionality in special education in an English population study. doi
  20. (2004). Exploring the use of effect sizes to evaluate the impact of different influences on child outcomes: Possibilities and limitations.
  21. (1995). Gender, Ethnic and Socio-economic Differences in Achievement and Progress: a longitudinal analysis of student achievement over 9 years. doi
  22. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas – A review of research evidence. doi
  23. (2007). Minority ethnic pupils in the longitudinal study of young people in England (LSYPE): Nottingham: Department for Schools, Children & Families.
  24. (2008). Minority Ethnic pupils in the LSYPE: Extension report on performance in public examinations at age 16. DCSF
  25. (1996). Poverty and child health: Oxford: Medical Press.Do some schools narrow the gap?
  26. (1997). Pupil Progress during Key Stage 1: a value added analysis of school effects. doi
  27. (2000). Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity.
  28. (2007). School effectiveness and equity: Making connections. Reading: Centre for British Teachers.
  29. (1991). Slants on slopes: Using multi-level models to investigate differential school effectiveness and its impact on pupils' examination results. doi
  30. (2008). some schools narrow the gap? page 31 Gillborn,
  31. (2007). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities
  32. (2006). The barriers to achievement for White/Caribbean pupils in English schools. doi
  33. (2006). The Black-White Test Score Gap Through Third Grade. doi
  34. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. doi
  35. (2001). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. doi
  36. (2004). The Race Gap in Student Achievement Scores: Longitudinal Evidence from a Racially Diverse School District. doi
  37. (2007). Understanding low achievement in English schools (CASE 118). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusions, London School of Economics.
  38. (2004). Understanding the Black-White Test Score Gap in the First Two Years of School. doi
  39. (2005). Who teaches whom? Race and the distribution of novice teachers. doi
  40. (1993). Why ability grouping must end: achieving excellence and equity in American education.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.