Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Design of interlocking bricks for enhanced wall construction, flexibility, alignment accuracy and load bearing

By Simion Hosea Kintingu

Abstract

The worldwide housing shortage has stimulated a search for appropriate, easy, fast and cost-effective new ways of wall construction. Among many technologies found to have promise is mortarless technology using dry-stack interlocking bricks/blocks. \ud This thesis is about such mortarless walling technology and in particular: how to improve wall-construction flexibility, the effects of brick irregularities on wall alignment accuracy and wall behaviour (stiffness, strength) when subject to lateral forces. \ud The flexibility of mortarless technology (MT) has been enhanced by the development of new bricks (centre-half bat and tee brick): the introduction of closer bricks led to the formation of two new bonds (patterns) namely Shokse and Lijuja bonds. It is now possible to construct more than half-brick-thick walls, to attach more than half-brickwide piers (buttresses) onto walls, and, using special bricks, to construct polygonal and curved walls using interlocking bricks. \ud Three methods (theoretical modeling, physical experiments and computer simulation) were used to analyze the effects of brick imperfections on wall alignment accuracy. Theoretical analysis confirmed that brick moulders should concentrate on achieving parallel top and bottom faces rather than achieving true square-ness. \ud Physical column assembly compared three brick-laying strategies namely: “random”, “reversing” and “replace”. The columns assembled using the “reversing” and “replace” strategies realized alignment improvement factors of 1.6 and 2.9 respectively over “random” strategy. The research also revealed that grooving, to prevent bricks making contact near their centre lines, improved column alignment by factor 2.13 and stiffness by factor 2.0, thus allowing construction of longer and higher walls without strengthening measures. \ud In order to attain alignment accuracy in accordance with BS 5628-3:2005 in a dry-stack mortarless wall, this research recommends using full bricks with top and bottom surface irregularities not exceeding ±0.5mm for un-grooved bricks, and up-to ±0.9mm for grooved bricks. \ud Further analysis was undertaken with respect to resource-use implications (cement, water, soil) of employing MT. Using MT will save 50% of wall construction cost and 50% cement consumption, which ultimately will reduce 40% of carbon emissions

Topics: TH
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2768

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. 772-20:2000. Methods of tests for Masonry Units. Determination of flatness of faces of masonry units. doi
  2. (2003). A Review of Rammed Earth Construction for DTI Partners in Innovation Project ‘Developing Rammed Earth
  3. (2003). AB fence executive summary for structural testing.
  4. (2004). Accelerated masonry construction: Review and future prospects. doi
  5. (1993). Appropriate Building Materials: a catalogue of potential solutions. doi
  6. (2006). Article History,
  7. (1993). Benefits of dry-stack interlocking concrete masonry as a component of cost effective construction.
  8. (1987). BREPAK Operators Manual. Overseas Development Administration. Building Research Establishment Client Report. Department of the Environment.
  9. (1983). Brickwork 1, Third Edition reprinted
  10. (2007). British Cement Association, Cement Industry Sets out its Work to help Climate Change,
  11. (1990). British Standards Institution.
  12. (1971). BS 12: 1971: Specifications for Portland cement (ordinary and rapid hardening) BSI,
  13. (1990). BS 1377: Part 2: 1990: Method of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. Part 2 Classification test.
  14. (1990). BS 4729: 1990. Specification for ‘Dimensions of bricks of special shapes and sizes’ BSI. doi
  15. (2005). BS 4729: 2005: Clay and calcium silicate bricks of special shapes and sizes – recommendations. doi
  16. (1997). BS 5328-1: 1997: Concrete – Part 1: Guide to specifying concrete. doi
  17. (1990). BS 5606: 1990: Guide to Accuracy in Building.
  18. (2005). BS 5628-1: 2005: Code of practice for the use of masonry – Part 1: Structural use of unreinforced masonry. doi
  19. (2005). BS 5628-3: 2005: Code of practice for the use of masonry – Part 3: Materials and components, design and workmanship. doi
  20. (1981). BS 6073: 1981: Precast concrete masonry units – Part 1: Specification for precast concrete masonry units. doi
  21. (1990). BS 7307-1:
  22. (2001). BS 8000-3: 2001: Workmanship on building sites – Part 3: Code of practice for masonry. doi
  23. (2005). BS 8103-2: 2005: Structural design of low rise buildings – Part 2: Code of practice for masonry wall for housing. doi
  24. (2003). BS EN 771-3: 2003: Specification for masonry units- Part 3: Aggregate masonry units (dense and light-weight aggregates). doi
  25. (2000). BS EN 772-1: 2000: Methods of test for masonry units- Part 1: Determination of compressive strength. doi
  26. (1997). BS ISO 1803: 1997: Building construction. Tolerances. Expression of dimensional accuracy
  27. (1988). Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures (ACI 530-88/ASCE 5-88)”, ACI, doi
  28. (1983). Building Materials in Developing Countries.
  29. (1997). Building with Earth: A handbook. London: Intermediate Technology. doi
  30. (1995). Building with Interlocking Blocks.
  31. (1984). Canadian Standard Association, “Masonry Design for Buildings,
  32. (1984). Case Studies on Earth Construction: Synthesis.
  33. (1992). Cities, Poverty, and Development: Urbanization in the third World, doi
  34. (2001). Compressed Stabilised Earth Blocks manufactured
  35. (1977). Compressive strength of walls built up of mud-blocks and soil cement-blocks. Building Research Unit, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development, Dar Es Salaam,
  36. (1999). Concrete Home Building Systems, the Portland Cement Associations Guide.
  37. (2001). Decreasing Pollution,' cement and Building Materials Review 3,
  38. (2001). Demonstration Intelligent Building – A methodology for the Promotion of Total Sustainability in the built Environment. Building and Environment Laquian, doi
  39. (2003). Design and construction of dry-stack masonry walls”,
  40. (1997). Design of Masonry Structures. London: E & F.N. Spon Hines, T
  41. (2004). Development of an innovative interlocking load bearing hollow block system in Malaysia. doi
  42. (1995). Development of dry stacked clay masonry wall systems.
  43. (1992). Development of new interlocking and mortarless block masonry units for efficient building systems.
  44. (1997). Discavaring Late Erector 1963-1988,
  45. (1986). Dry stone walling technologymanufacturing and using building blocks without mortar”.
  46. (2001). Durability of Compressed and Cement-Stabilised Building Blocks. doi
  47. (2002). Dynamically Compacted Cement-Stabilised Soil Blocks for Low-cost Walling.
  48. (2005). Earth Building “Methods and Materials, Repair and Conservation”. Taylor and Francis, doi
  49. (2000). Earth Construction in Africa. Proceedings: Strategies for a Sustainable Built Environment,
  50. (1994). Earth Construction: A Comprehensive Guide. doi
  51. (1991). Factors affecting masonry labor productivity, doi
  52. (2003). Fracture resistant structures based on topological interlocking with non-planar contacts, doi
  53. (1975). From Shantytown to township: an economic study of African poverty and rehousing in a South African City, doi
  54. (1963). Handbook for building homes of earth” , Texas Transportation Institute, Report for the Agency for International Development, Bulletin 21, E 14-63,
  55. (1985). Hollow concrete masonry unit shape modification to improve productivity of placement: results of the preliminary research effort.
  56. (1995). Housing without Houses: Participation, Flexibility, and Enablement. Intermediate Technology Publications. doi
  57. (2004). Hydraform Training Manual. Johannesburg 220 Rondebult road, Libradene boksburt. P.O.Box 17570, Sunward park 1470. (www.hydraform.com) IGPCC
  58. (1994). Improved Processes for Production Soil-Cement Building Blocks.
  59. (2003). Interlocking Bricks Presser Machine an Appropriate Technology for Brick Production. Construction Industry Forum proceedings pgs. 51 - 67. – Dar es Salaam.
  60. (1999). Investigation on the initial settlement of dry-stacked masonry under compression.
  61. (1985). ISBN 0 580 121895 British Standards Institution.
  62. (1995). Labor and growth Crisis in Sub-Sahara Africa,
  63. (2003). Laboratory-based productivity study on alternative masonry systems. doi
  64. M.R.(2006) Behaviour of interlocking mortarless block masonry, doi
  65. (1987). Macro-policies for Appropriate Technology in Developing Countries.
  66. (1990). Management of technology transfer. International Labour Organization,
  67. (1974). Masonry Construction Operations, doi
  68. (1983). Materials with novel architectonics assemblies of interlocked elements. doi
  69. (2000). Method of test for linear shrinkage of soils (bar method). Gepartment of transportation, Engineering service centre. Transportation Laboratory, P.O.Box 19128,
  70. (1977). Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes”,
  71. (2001). Modular interlocking brick system in wide use at BHP,
  72. (1988). Mortarless masonry: the Mecano system.
  73. (1990). New Ideas for Housing: The experience of three countries.
  74. (1997). On behalf of the Brick Development Association. Creative Brick work. By Arnold,
  75. (1995). Performance of Stabilised Soil Block Masonry under Uniform and Concentrated Compressive Loading.
  76. (1993). Plea for placement armour blocks in orderly patterns,
  77. (2001). Quantitative criteria for the selection of soils for rammed earth wall construction. Thesis presented at the Faculty of built environment,
  78. (2005). Second edition, doi
  79. (1990). Small-scale Brick Making: doi
  80. (1993). Soil Testing for Soil-Cement Block Preparation.
  81. (1974). Soil-Stabilizations, building Research Unit data sheet, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development’s. Dar Es Salaam,
  82. (1983). Stabilised Soil Construction in Kenya.
  83. (1975). Standard Specification for hollow load-bearing concrete masonry. doi
  84. (1993). State of the art of mortarless concrete masonry in South Africa.
  85. (1991). Strength and deformation properties of a grouted, dry-stacked, Interlocking Concrete Block System.
  86. (2006). Strength correlation between individual block, prism and basic wall panel for load bearing interlocking mortarless hollow block masonry. doi
  87. (2000). The Brick Development Association Guide to successful brickwork, second edition. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Linacre House,
  88. (2001). The Green Guide to Housing Specification – Six Guiding Principles to Improve the Sustainability of the Housing Construction Industry. July Issue Hydraform
  89. (1985). The Meccano System and the Special Purpose Meccano sets,
  90. (2005). The principle of topological interlocking in extraterrestrial construction, doi
  91. (1998). The shear strength of dry-stacked masonry walls.
  92. (1997). The urban challenge
  93. (2000). United Republic of Tanzania, National Human Settlements Development Policy. Ministry of Lands and Human Settlements Developments (MLHSD), Dar es Salaam,
  94. (1988). Urban Housing in third World, doi
  95. (1985). Urban Land and Shelter for the Poor. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.