Location of Repository

A study of the relationship between the mathematical beliefs and teaching practices of home-educating parents in the context of their children’s perceptions and knowledge of mathematics

By Noraisha Farooq Yusof


Home-education, also known as home-schooling, is an educational choice made by families to facilitate learning at home rather than in school. Research by Rothermel (2002) and Rudner (1999) shows that, on average, home-educated children far outperform school-educated children on standard mathematics tests. But at present, no study has yet investigated the key reasons behind this phenomenon – indeed, no research has taken an in-depth look into the ways in which parents facilitate the learning of mathematics at home and the resultant effects on their children’s mathematical development. Therefore, in this study, we will consider the nature of mathematics education through the eyes of the home-educating parent and their children. \ud Through questionnaires, this research examines the relationship between the educational and mathematical beliefs of home-educating parents. Parental views are compared with the children’s perceptions of the home learning environment, their mathematical beliefs and their mathematical understanding. Furthermore, the children’s mathematical understanding is addressed through consideration of their responses to a series of mathematical questions set within the context of Key Stages 1-3 of the National Curriculum. To obtain the research sample, home-educating families from across the United Kingdom were contacted via the Internet, and information was collected through both email and postal response. From the parental data, three categories of home-educator were highlighted: (1) Structured, (2) Semi-Formal and (3) Informal (as described by Lowe and Thomas, 2002). The children’s questionnaire responses were then analysed, using illustrative case studies to demonstrate how different home-educating approaches of their parents could result in different perceptions of mathematics and mathematical learning in the children. For example, children learning via a ‘structured’ approach were less likely to be able to measure their own level of mathematical ability than children from the other families; they also mentioned limited resources and less independence when learning mathematics. \ud When examining the children’s assessed work, selective case studies, together with detailed analysis, revealed a strong link between the home-educating approach and the problem-solving strategies of the children. Children from structured families were often competent when solving more routine, ‘calculation-type’ problems, but less able to adapt their knowledge to problems that required a ‘deeper’ understanding of the concept. Children from families where the parent themselves had a mathematical background (e.g. mathematician or mathematics teacher) typically used formal mathematical reasoning in their work. On the other hand, children learning from ‘informal’ families (where emphasis was placed on ‘child-directed’ learning) seldom used ‘standard procedural’ type approaches to solve problems, but instead displayed a range of creative strategies. \ud The findings suggested that a home-educating parent’s conception of mathematics not only influenced the way in which they attempt to teach mathematics but also their children’s mathematical beliefs and learning style. Furthermore, there was evidence to suggest that certain home-educating approaches encouraged a ‘type’ of mathematical understanding that could be applied in a range of situations, whereas other approaches, particularly where both the learning materials and interaction with others was restricted, resulted in a more limited level of mathematical understanding

Topics: LB, QA
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2804

Suggested articles



  1. (2008). [Online] Available at:
  2. (2007). [Online] Monstrous Maths:
  3. (2002). A class of their own.
  4. (2000). A comparative discussion of the notion of ‘validity’ in qualitative and quantitative research.
  5. (2003). A Critical View of Home Education. doi
  6. (1989). A perspective on thinking. doi
  7. (2000). A search for understanding. doi
  8. (1991). An analysis of diverging approaches to simple arithmetic: Preference and its consequences. doi
  9. (2004). An investigation into the teaching of mathematics by home educators.
  10. (2005). Available at: http://cougar.eb.com/dictionary/understandable [Accessed 15th of August,
  11. (2006). Available online at: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n8/
  12. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic inquiry. doi
  13. (1988). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: doi
  14. (2006). Collaborative Learning in Mathematics: A challenge to our beliefs and practices. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education/National Research and Development Centre for research into all areas of adult numeracy.
  15. (2001). Common arguments about the strengths and limitations of home schooling. doi
  16. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In
  17. Council (2001b). Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment.
  18. (2005). Curriculum Authority Website: Available at:
  19. (1998). Educating Children at Home.
  20. (2002). Educating your children at home.
  21. (2004). Education other than at School: A Way Forward for Gypsy/Travellers. Leeds University: Research funded by the CfBT Education Trust.
  22. (2006). Education Otherwise [Online] Home Education – An Ordinary Story. Available at: http://education-otherwise.org/HE/rmount.htm [Accessed 12th of
  23. (2007). Education Otherwise [Online]: Legal aspects of home education in England & Wales, Available at: http://education-otherwise.org/HE/Legal.pdf [Accessed 14th of February,
  24. (1987). Educational Research - Competencies for Analysis and Application. doi
  25. (1997). Effective Teachers of Numeracy: Final Report,
  26. (1988). Essentials of learning for instruction (2 nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs,
  27. (1988). Focus on research into practice in diagnostic and prescriptive mathematics.
  28. (1994). Home schooling parents: An analysis of choices.
  29. (1991). Home Schooling: Political, Historical, and Pedagogical Perspectives. doi
  30. (2002). Home-education: Aims, practices and rationales’. Unpublished PhD thesis,
  31. (2004). Home-Education: Comparison of Home and School Educated children on PIPS Baseline Assessments [Online] Available at: http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.rothermel/Research/ESRC/PipsBaseline.htm [Accessed 13th of
  32. (2006). Home-Education.org: Educational Philosophy - Alt1 [Online] Available at http://www.home-education.org.uk/ed-philos-alt1.htm [Accessed
  33. (2007). In Elective home education: Research and advice commissioned by the Department for Education and Skills. The situation regarding the current policy, provision and practice doi
  34. (2005). Indicators in Primary Schools) Assessments.
  35. (1998). Influence of plain vs. Fancy design in response rates for web surveys. [Online]
  36. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. doi
  37. (1987). Learning in school and out. doi
  38. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics.
  39. (2006). Likert scales: Dispelling the confusion. [Online] Available at:
  40. (1993). Mathematics in the Streets and in Schools. doi
  41. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. doi
  42. (1998). Open and closed mathematics approaches: Student experiences and understandings. doi
  43. (1981). Phenomenography. Describing conceptions of the world around us. doi
  44. (1998). Principles for constructing web surveys [Online] Available at: http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/websurveyppr.pdf [Accessed 13th of
  45. (2004). Promoting equity in mathematics classrooms - important teaching practices and their impact on student learning.
  46. (1992). Qualitative research for education (2 nd Ed.)
  47. (1976). Relational and instrumental understanding.
  48. (1992). Research on Affect in Mathematics Education: A Reconceptualization. In
  49. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject-matter knowledge part of the equation. In
  50. (1999). Scholastic achievement and demographic characteristics of homeschool students in
  51. (2003). School-aged children who are educated at home by their parents: Is there a role for educational psychologists? doi
  52. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. doi
  53. (2005). Strategy [Online] Available at: http://www.mathsyear2000.org/resources/numeracy/pdfs/y456str3.pdf (page 83) [Accessed 14th of
  54. (1997). Strengths of Their Own—Home Schoolers Across America: Academic Achievement, Family Characteristics, and Longitudinal Traits.
  55. (2001). Teaching Mathematics to Able Children. doi
  56. (1994). The Development of Gifted and Talented Mathematics and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Standards.
  57. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. In doi
  58. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively-based misconceptions. doi
  59. (2005). The Face of Home-Based Education 1: who, why and how. Part 1 of the results of research commissioned by The Centre for Personalised Education Trust. Nottingham: Educational Heretics Press in association with Personalised Education Now.
  60. (2001). The Governess in Nineteenth-Century Literature: Introduction. In
  61. (1985). The Mind’s New Science. doi
  62. (1997). The Next Learning System: and why Home-Schoolers are Trailblazers.
  63. (1987). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. doi
  64. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: doi
  65. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice, doi
  66. (1983). Theoretical and Pragmatic Issues
  67. (1985). Understanding understanding. doi
  68. (1997). Virtual subjects: using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. doi
  69. (1991). Where subject knowledge is matter. In
  70. (1995). Winning Beliefs In
  71. (2006). Yorks and Lincs: Home grown learning [Online]. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/politics_show/5335140.stm. [Accessed

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.