Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Attitude toward Muslim Proximity Index (AMPI): a measure of social distance

By Adrian Brockett, Andrew Village and Leslie J. Francis


The Attitude toward Muslim Proximity Index (AMPI) is a six-item scale that uses tolerance to different degrees of social distance to assess prejudice towards Muslims. It was tested on 1777 teenage school children from northern England who indicated their religion as either 'Christian' or 'no religion', and demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .81). The index was higher among pupils who supported the views of the British National Party and among those who believed that British Muslims should adopt Western culture; but lower among those who knew Muslims or had Muslim friends. The AMPI is a useful measure of Islamophobic attitudes that does not rely on responses to specific events or on detailed knowledge of the Muslim religion

Topics: HT, BP
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. doi
  2. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. doi
  3. (1953). A technique for the measurement of race attitudes. doi
  4. (2007). Adolescent attitudes in York toward Muslims and Islam. In Community identity: Dynamics of religion
  5. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. doi
  6. (1998). Bridging the racial divide in the United States: The effect of gender. doi
  7. (1999). Christian religion and ethnic prejudice in cross-national perspective: A comparative analysis of the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium) doi
  8. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. doi
  9. (1978). Correlates of attitudinal social distance toward the mentally ill: A review and re-survey doi
  10. (2003). Gender differences in whites' racial attitudes: Are women's attitudes really more favorable? doi
  11. (1928). Immigration and race attitudes. doi
  12. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. doi
  13. (2007). Islamophobia in contemporary Britain: The evidence of the opinion polls, doi
  14. (2003). Office for National Statistics. doi
  15. (1997). Outgroup prejudice in Western Europe. doi
  16. (2001). Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. doi
  17. (1994). Racial, ethnic and religious social distance in Surinam: An exploration of the 'Strategic Alliance Hypothesis' doi
  18. (1998). Religiosity and prejudice: An update and denominational analysis. doi
  19. (2000). Religious terms and attitudes in the classroom (part 2). doi
  20. (1997). Social distance towards the mentally ill: Results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. doi
  21. (1959). Social distance. Yellow
  22. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. doi
  23. (2003). The impact of contact on stigmatizing attitudes toward people with mental illness. doi
  24. (2007). The intellectual construction of "Social Distance": Toward a recovery of Georg Simmel’s social geometry. doi
  25. (2000). The relation between religion and racism: The role of post-critical beliefs. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.