Location of Repository

A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint

By Juul Achten, Nicholas R. Parsons, Richard P. Edlin, Damian R. Griffin and Matthew L. Costa

Abstract

Background: Hip replacement (arthroplasty) surgery is a highly successful treatment for patients with severe symptomatic arthritis of the hip joint. For older patients, several designs of Total Hip Arthroplasty have shown excellent results in terms of both function and value for money. However, in younger more active patients, there is approximately a 50% failure rate at 25 years for traditional implants. Hip resurfacing is a relatively new arthroplasty technique. In a recent review of the literature on resurfacing arthroplasty it was concluded that the short-term functional results appear promising but some potential early disadvantages were identified, including the risk of femoral neck fracture and collapse of the head of the femur. The aim of the current study is to assess whether there is a difference in functional hip scores at one year post-operation between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Secondary aims include assessment of complication rates for both procedures as well cost effectiveness. \ud Methods/design: All patients medically fit for surgery and deemed suitable for a resurfacing arthroplasty are eligible to take part in this study. A randomisation sequence will be produced and administered independently. After consenting, all patients will be clinically reviewed and hip function, quality of life and physical activity level will be assessed through questionnaires. The allocated surgery will then be performed with the preferred technique of the surgeon. Six weeks post-operation hip function will be assessed and complications recorded. Three, six and 12 months post-operation hip function, quality of life and physical activity level will be assessed. Additional information about patients' out-of-pocket expenses will also be collected

Topics: RD
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2914

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. doi
  2. (2006). AG: A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br doi
  3. (1995). Bulstrode CJ: Which primary total hip replacement?.
  4. (2005). Drabu KJ: Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties–a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. doi
  5. (2006). GC: Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five - to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br doi
  6. (2004). Herberts P: The Otto Aufranc Award. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res doi
  7. (2001). Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?. Clin Orthop Relat Res doi
  8. (2005). McCaskie AW: Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br doi
  9. (2006). Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res doi
  10. (2005). Pynsent PB: Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. doi
  11. (1996). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. doi
  12. (2005). Self-reports of health-care utilization: Diary or questionnaire? Self-reports of health-care utilization: Diary or questionnaire?. Int J Tech Ass Health Care doi
  13. (2003). Simple as possible? Or too simple? Possible limits to the universality of the one half standard deviation. Med Care doi
  14. (1999). Siney PD: Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip. 20-to-30 year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br doi
  15. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
  16. (2006). The optimal metal-metal arthroplasty is still a total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative. doi
  17. (2007). The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br doi
  18. (1969). Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. doi
  19. (2007). Unit Costs of Health and Social Care

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.