Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Marriage, religion and human flourishing: how sustainable is the classic Durkheim thesis in contemporary Europe?

By Emyr Williams, Leslie J. Francis and Andrew Village


This paper draws on the three waves of the European Values Survey across five countries (Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Spain and Sweden) to investigate the relationship between indicators of positive psychology (conceptualised as feelings of happiness and satisfaction with life), religiosity (conceptualised as self-assigned religious affiliation and self-reported religious attendance) and marital status. The results demonstrate that religiosity is, in general, positively correlated with both indicators of positive psychology. Further, across all waves and all countries, the pattern emerges that those respondents who are married are likely to report higher levels of happiness and greater satisfaction in life. These data provide contemporary support for the classic Durkheim thesis linking the two institutions of marriage and religion with human flourishing

Topics: HQ, HN, BL
Publisher: Routledge
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). [1897]). Suicide: A study in sociology. doi
  2. (1996). Are religious people happier? A study among undergraduates.
  3. (1983). cohabitation and divorce: The social significance of religion and the changing context of family life in doi
  4. (2003). Correlation between religion and happiness: A replication. doi
  5. (1987). Dimensions of positive emotions. doi
  6. (2006). Does marriage make people happy or do happy people get married? doi
  7. (2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage, divorce and happiness in Germany. doi
  8. (1989). Happiness as a function of personality and social encounters.
  9. (2007). Income and satisfaction after marital disruption in Germany. doi
  10. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. doi
  11. (1976). Membership in different types of voluntary associations and psychological well-being. doi
  12. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. doi
  13. (1991). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views. doi
  14. (2003). Re-examining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. doi
  15. (1965). Relation of sexual behaviours, values and conflicts to avowed happiness. doi
  16. (2000). Religion and happiness: A study in empirical theology.
  17. (1997). Religion, personality and happiness. doi
  18. (2000). Religiosity and happiness: During adolescence, young adulthood and later life.
  19. (2004). Religiosity, personality, and happiness: A study among Israeli male undergraduates. doi
  20. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. doi
  21. (1957). Religious practice and personal adjustment of older people.
  22. (1980). Religiousness, conversion and subjective well-being: The healthy-minded religion of modern American women. doi
  23. (1966). Single and married undergraduates’ measured personality needs and self-rated happiness. doi
  24. (1991). Strength of religious affiliation and life satisfaction. doi
  25. (2006). Suicidal ideation among young people in the UK: churchgoing an inhibitory influence? doi
  26. (1988). The changing relationship of marital status to reported happiness. doi
  27. (1981). The contribution of marital happiness to global happiness. doi
  28. (1987). The contribution of marriage to the life satisfaction of black adults. doi
  29. (2001). The European Values Study: A third wave. WORC:
  30. (2005). The limits of social capital: Durkeim, suicide, and social cohesion. doi
  31. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. doi
  32. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. doi
  33. (1999). The Satisfaction with Life Scales (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, doi
  34. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.