Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1) trial protocol. Computerised on-scene decision support for emergency ambulance staff to assess and plan care for older people who have fallen: evaluation of costs and benefits using a pragmatic cluster randomised trial

By Helen Snooks, Wai-Yee Cheung, Jacqueline Close, Jeremy Dale, Sarah Gaze, Ioan Humphreys, Ronan Lyons, Suzanne Mason, Yasmin Merali, Julie Peconi, Ceri Phillips, Judith Phillips, Stephen E. Roberts, Ian T. Russell, Antonio Sánchez, Mushtaq Wani, Bridget Wells and Richard Whitfield

Abstract

Background: Many emergency ambulance calls are for older people who have fallen. As half of them are left at home, a community-based response may often be more appropriate than hospital attendance. The SAFER 1 trial will assess the costs and benefits of a new healthcare technology - hand-held computers with computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) software - to help paramedics decide who needs hospital attendance, and who can be safely left at home with referral to community falls services. \ud Methods/Design: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial with a qualitative component. We shall allocate 72 paramedics ('clusters') at random between receiving the intervention and a control group delivering care as usual, of whom we expect 60 to complete the trial.\ud \ud Patients are eligible if they are aged 65 or older, live in the study area but not in residential care, and are attended by a study paramedic following an emergency call for a fall. Seven to 10 days after the index fall we shall offer patients the opportunity to opt out of further follow up. Continuing participants will receive questionnaires after one and 6 months, and we shall monitor their routine clinical data for 6 months. We shall interview 20 of these patients in depth. We shall conduct focus groups or semi-structured interviews with paramedics and other stakeholders.\ud \ud The primary outcome is the interval to the first subsequent reported fall (or death). We shall analyse this and other measures of outcome, process and cost by 'intention to treat'. We shall analyse qualitative data thematically. \ud Discussion: Since the SAFER 1 trial received funding in August 2006, implementation has come to terms with ambulance service reorganisation and a new national electronic patient record in England. In response to these hurdles the research team has adapted the research design, including aspects of the intervention, to meet the needs of the ambulance services.\ud \ud In conclusion this complex emergency care trial will provide rigorous evidence on the clinical and cost effectiveness of CCDS for paramedics in the care of older people who have fallen

Topics: RA
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:wrap.warwick.ac.uk:2999

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). A 1 Item Short-form Health Survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care doi
  2. (2008). A: Thematic Research network for emergency and UnScheduled Treatment (TRUST): scoping the potential. BMC Emerg Med doi
  3. (2003). BH: The Cochrane Library: Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people (Cochrane Review) Chichester: doi
  4. (2005). C: Development of a Common Outcome Data Set for Fall Injury Prevention Trials: The Prevention of Falls Network Europe Consensus. J Am Geriatr Soc doi
  5. (2002). CG: Falls in the older population: a pilot study to assess those attended by London ambulance service but not taken to ED. Age Ageing doi
  6. Cheung WY: Fit to be left: can ambulance staff use an assessment tool to decide if an older person who has fallen can be safely left at home? London, Ambulance Service
  7. (1998). CJ: A decision analytic approach to commissioning ambulance cardiac services. doi
  8. (2004). CJ: Prevention of Falls Network Europe: a thematic network aimed at introducing good practice in effective falls prevention across Europe. Eur J Ageing doi
  9. (2006). Clas D: A simple fall in the elderly: not so simple. doi
  10. (2008). Covering our backs: ambulance crews’ attitudes towards clinical documentation when 999 patients are not conveyed to hospital. Emerg Med J doi
  11. (1996). Detsky AS: CostEffectiveness Analysis of Potential Improvements to Emergency Medical Services for Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Ann Emerg Med doi
  12. (2008). Developing a new response to non-urgent emergency calls: evaluation of a nurse and paramedic partnership intervention. doi
  13. (2004). E: Safety of telephone consultation for ‘non-serious’ emergency ambulance service patients. Qual Saf Health Care
  14. (2003). Emergency medical services screening of elderly falls in the home. Prehospital Emergency Care
  15. (1987). Factors associated with serious injury during falls by ambulatory nursing home residents. doi
  16. (2004). for Clinical Excellence: Assessment and prevention of falls in older people National Institute for Clinical Excellence
  17. (1993). GA: Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ doi
  18. (2005). Gaps between policy, protocols and practice: a qualitative study of the views and practice of emergency ambulance staff concerning the care of patients with non-urgent needs. Qual Saf Healthcare doi
  19. (1987). Group: The prevention of falls in later life. KIWG on the Prevention of Falls by the Elderly. Dan Med Bull
  20. (2001). Health: National Service Framework for older people Department of Health doi
  21. (2001). Higginson IJ: Measuring quality of life. Are quality of life measures patient centred?. BMJ doi
  22. (1992). Home accidents in older people: role of primary health care team. BMJ doi
  23. (2003). Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom. doi
  24. (2001). Interdisciplinary practice in the prevention of falls - a review of working models of care. Age Ageing doi
  25. (2003). JP: ost effectiveness and cost utility model of public place defibrillators in improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest. BMJ doi
  26. (1974). Kahneman D: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science doi
  27. (1990). Kling M: A review of prehospital care litigation in a larger metropolitan EMS system. Ann Emerg Med doi
  28. (2008). Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ doi
  29. (2004). My home is my castle! Or is it? Hospitalizations following home injury in Israel,1997-2001. Israel Medical Association Journal
  30. (2002). Nguyen-Van-Tam JS: Emergency (999) calls to the ambulance service that do not result in the patient being transported to hospital: an epidemiological study. Emerg Med J doi
  31. (2002). NHS emergency response to 999 calls: alternatives for cases that are neither life-threatening nor serious. BMJ doi
  32. (2004). Nonconveyance of 999 patients and related clinical documentation: Policy, practice and views Report to the Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust
  33. (2002). randomised trials: Methodological and ethical considerations. Medical Research Council
  34. (2006). Roberts S: Emergency care of older people who fall: a missed opportunity. Qual Saf Health Care doi
  35. (1993). Seibert JH: A patient survey system to measure quality improvement questionnaire reliability and validity. Medical Care doi
  36. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? Deciding whether to go to hospital after a 999 call. J Health Serv Res Policy doi
  37. (1995). SJ: atient-initiated refusals of prehospital care: ambulance call report documentation, patient outcome and online medical command. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine doi
  38. (2001). Society. BGSaAAoOS: Guidelines for the prevention of falls in older persons. doi
  39. (1998). Takemoto T: Falls among community-dwelling elderly in Japan. doi
  40. (1990). The Euroqol Group: EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy doi
  41. (2006). Using simulation to estimate the cost effectiveness of improving ambulance and thrombolysis response times after myocardial infarction. Emerg Med J doi
  42. (2004). Youren A: Older Fallers Attended by the Ambulance Service and Left at Home: Risks and Opportunities Swansea: Report to the Wales Office of Research and Development

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.