Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Multicenter evaluation of geometric accuracy of MRI protocols used in experimental stroke

By Xenios Milidonis, Ross J. Lennen, Maurits A. Jansen, Susanne Mueller, Philipp Boehm-Sturm, William M. Holmes, Emily S. Sena, Malcolm R. Macleod and Ian Marshall

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that multicenter preclinical stroke studies should be carried out to improve translation from bench to bedside, but the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners routinely used in experimental stroke has not yet been evaluated. We aimed to assess and compare geometric accuracy of preclinical scanners and examine the longitudinal stability of one scanner using a simple quality assurance (QA) protocol. Six 7 Tesla animal scanners across six different preclinical imaging centers throughout Europe were used to scan a small structural phantom and estimate linear scaling errors in all orthogonal directions and volumetric errors. Between-scanner imaging consisted of a standard sequence and each center’s preferred sequence for the assessment of infarct size in rat models of stroke. The standard sequence was also used to evaluate the drift in accuracy of the worst performing scanner over a period of six months following basic gradient calibration. Scaling and volumetric errors using the standard sequence were less variable than corresponding errors using different stroke sequences. The errors for one scanner, estimated using the standard sequence, were very high (above 4% scaling errors for each orthogonal direction, 18.73% volumetric error). Calibration of the gradient coils in this system reduced scaling errors to within ±1.0%; these remained stable during the subsequent 6-month assessment. In conclusion, despite decades of use in experimental studies, preclinical MRI still suffers from poor and variable geometric accuracy, influenced by the use of miscalibrated systems and various types of sequences for the same purpose. For effective pooling of data in multicenter studies, centers should adopt standardized procedures for system QA and in vivo imaging

Publisher: Public Library of Science
Year: 2016
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:124251
Provided by: Enlighten

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.